Hello,
Which steps should I follow to correctly configure the ISAPI redirector
(from jakarta project) to bind with the embedded Tomcat on JBOSS?
Or is there a better way to set IIS to deliver the static content and
redirect to JBOSS for serverlets and JSPs?
Should I use the JBOSS/Jetty
Does anyone know if there is a way to make php work
with JBoss 3.2.3
Thank you,
Mello
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
---
SF.Net is
).
He said they were working on it, so go ask them :)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joao Mello
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 and PHP
Does anyone know
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 13:50, Joao Mello wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to make php work
with JBoss 3.2.3
Thank you,
Mello
Why would you want to do that? (just kidding)
It depends on what you mean by making it work with jboss. If you just
want php and java to exist on the same
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 20:02, Barlow, Dustin wrote:
Adrian Brock wrote:
The key contraint is the MaximumSize in the proxy config. This
configures a pool of jms sessions that deliver messages to the mdb
container. Once these are all used, no messages will be delivered
until an mdb finishes
08:48:56,097 INFO [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package:
file:/Volumes/local/jboss-3.2.3/server/default/deploy/mycity.war
08:48:59,156 INFO [EmbeddedTomcatService] deploy, ctxPath=/mycity,
warUrl=file:/Volumes/local/jboss-3.2.3/server/default/tmp/deploy/
tmp33352mycity.war/
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 Unable to invoke setDelegate
08:48:56,097 INFO [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package:
file:/Volumes/local/jboss-3.2.3/server/default/deploy/mycity.war
08:48:59,156 INFO [EmbeddedTomcatService] deploy, ctxPath=/mycity,
warUrl=file
I can't find any reference to exhausted or exhaust in either
the session pool, the jms connection, the mdb pool or
anywhere else in the mdb container.
Care to provide a stacktrace?
Unfortunately, I lost the log that had the stack trace in it. I didn't mean
to suggest that the exact word was
Adrian Brock wrote:
The key contraint is the MaximumSize in the proxy config. This
configures a pool of jms sessions that deliver messages to the mdb
container. Once these are all used, no messages will be delivered
until an mdb finishes its invocation/transaction.
One other thing I forgot to
All,
we are trying to setup a JBoss 3.2.3 (Tomcat) cluster with Apache and
mod_jk.
We discovered that the sticky sessions with mod_jk only work if you give
the jvmRoute parameter in the tomcat configuration file. If we do not
use sticky sessions we receive an error from Tomcat if during form
If we didn't check any dirty flag you would not be able to
update the data.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boulatian,
MisakSent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 2:38 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss
3.2.3 commit option B
Hi,
It seems like JBoss
3.2.3 commit option B or C a lot slower than JBoss 3.2.1 with same commit
options. The only difference is that with JBoss 3.2.1 we were running CMP 1.1
with 'modified' flag optimization to minimize the number of synchronizations
with Database (it served as some kind
Mridul Jain wrote:
hi Ban,
I added bind_addr attribute in both the servers with
their respective ips and both the servers seem to
identify each other. But I am getting this line:
--
18:10:52,399 INFO
Mridul Jain wrote:
hi Ban,
I have infact used the IP address of the servers and
*NOT* 127.0.0.1. That is why I am suprised why I am
getting the following behaviour.
I don't believe you :-)
Show me your cluster-service.xml and your /etc/hosts dump
--
Bela Ban
http://www.jgroups.org
Cell: (408)
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3
commit option B or C a lot slower than JBoss 3.2.1
Hi,
It seems like
JBoss 3.2.3 commit option B or C a lot slower than JBoss 3.2.1 with same
commit options. The only difference is that with JBoss 3.2.1 we were running
CMP
level locking in DB, give us normal speed to go
to production.
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 commit option B or C a lot slower than
JBoss 3.2.1
Why
-
From: Alexey Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 commit option B or C a
lot slower than JBoss 3.2.1
Why don't you try
Hi Dustin,
BD I am using McKoi as an embedded database in JBoss-3.2.3.
BD The mckoidb.jar is bundled in the application's ear file and uses the
BD following in application.xml to deploy it.
I think it is not a good idea to package jdbc driver with the
application. Normally jdbc
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-3.2.3: Classloader problem?
Yes. Some of the time the error did occur after redeploying.
On occasions
though, after restarting JBoss, the error would also occur on
the first
process that accessed the datasource from a cmt ssb. I
again Adrian for the all the excellent support.
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Barlow, Dustin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:32 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss-3.2.3: Classloader problem?
Yes. Some of the time
Troy,
After upgrading to JBoss 3.2.2 in our RH Linux 7.3 IBM JDK 1.4.1 environment,
JBoss kept running out of memory every couple hours. I don't know if this
will help, since the hardware is different, but I created some monitoring
plugins based on information in the very handy IBM JDK Diagnosis
set bind_addr in UDP to the IP address ot the server (*not* 127.0.0.1), e.g.
UDP mcast_addr=228.1.2.3 mcast_port=45566 ip_ttl=64
*bind_addr=192.168.0.2 *... /
Mridul Jain wrote:
hi Ben,
Here is my cluster-service.xml
Please tell me what to do?
Thanks,
MJ
--- Bela Ban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Ban,
I have infact used the IP address of the servers and
*NOT* 127.0.0.1. That is why I am suprised why I am
getting the following behaviour.
MJ
--- Mridul Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Ban,
I added bind_addr attribute in both the servers with
their respective ips and both the servers
hi Ban,
I added bind_addr attribute in both the servers with
their respective ips and both the servers seem to
identify each other. But I am getting this line:
--
18:10:52,399 INFO [DefaultPartition] New cluster view
First have you tried kill -3 886 to get a threaddump?
886 is the pid of one the java threads.
This will show you stacktraces of the current active threads
on the console.
You said it crashed, did the output from the crash
include a threaddump?
Second, it is generally a bad idea to run a java
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 20:56, Poppe, Troy wrote:
Adrian,
4. Is there any way that you know of to get JBoss to convince the JVM that it
needs to do a system-wide gc? Is it as simple as calling System.gc()?
Nearly that simple. System.gc() is just a hint, the VM can ignore it.
If the VM takes
I am using McKoi as an embedded database in JBoss-3.2.3.
The mckoidb.jar is bundled in the application's ear file and uses the
following in application.xml to deploy it.
application
module
javamckoidb.jar/java
/module
/application
McKoi is registered via -ds.xml file and all
, January 14, 2004 12:56 PM
To: Jboss User (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 problems running in Linux for
z/Seri es
Adrian,
Thanks for the reply. Couple of comments to your response.
1. Unfortunately, when the instance of Linux crashes, it crashes hard. No
response to any terminal
The exception means the classloader has been undeployed.
It no longer holds a reference to the repository
Did you redeploy something?
But something is holding a reference to the classloader.
It looks like you've hit the caching done by Class.forName()
in java 1.4 that breaks hot deployment?
This
into a
running state).
T
-
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 problems running in Linux for z/Series
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization:
Date: 14 Jan 2004 21:05:57 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 20:56, Poppe, Troy wrote:
Adrian,
4
something funky going on with the java processes
(since they were in a sleep state for a long time, and transitioned into a
running state).
T
-
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 problems running in Linux for z/Series
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Again, Adrian, thanks for your continued help. Do you know of any one who is
running JBoss on Linux for z/Series that might be able to shed some light on
this?
Thanks.
Troy Poppe
--
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 problems running in Linux for z/Seri
es
From: Adrian Brock
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/14/2004 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss-3.2.3: Classloader problem?
The exception means the classloader has been undeployed.
It no longer holds a reference to the repository
Did you redeploy something?
But something is holding a reference to the classloader
hi Ben,
Here is my cluster-service.xml
Please tell me what to do?
Thanks,
MJ
--- Bela Ban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mridul Jain wrote:
hi,
I am running jboss-3.2.3 on GNU/Linux box and
trying
to get jboss clustering up and running.
First I check if multicasting works fine, by
Mridul Jain wrote:
hi,
I am running jboss-3.2.3 on GNU/Linux box and trying
to get jboss clustering up and running.
First I check if multicasting works fine, by running
the following from jgroup:
On host1:
--
java
Hi,
I just downloaded JBoss 3.2.3 Jetty 4.2.14 and ran the all config,
straight out of the box. It seems that it doesn't like the web-console.
However, I think the problem is really the jboss.net sar. My reaoning is
as follows:
1. I copy the default configuration and make changes to it for our
hi,
I am running jboss-3.2.3 on GNU/Linux box and trying
to get jboss clustering up and running.
First I check if multicasting works fine, by running
the following from jgroup:
On host1:
--
java org.javagroups.tests.McastReceiverTest
-mcast_addr
Hi Midrul,
I had a simular problem where the hosts couldn't see each other. I fixed
that setting the ip address on each host.
Felipe
First I check if multicasting works fine, by running
the following from jgroup:
On host1:
--
java
Thanks for clearing that up, there had been a number of emails and posts
in the Web forums about this and us Jetty users were getting a little
anxious.
We do appreciate the high level of traffic on this list and the forums,
coupled with the silly season of Xmas/ New Year (hence my late reply).
, the Tomcat 5
integration is now available as well.
Cheers,
Sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Lassau
Sent: lundi, 22. décembre 2003 02:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3
There has not been an annoucement that we will not provide a jetty bundle. There has
not been a seperate bundle due to the fact that the initial testing indicated new
unit test failures that I did not have time to look into. We are simply taking the
latest stable sar release from the jetty
: 12/30/2003 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy
web-console.war
error
My guess is that the -p option on cygwin preserves the
file system permissions, but the other methods do not.
Regards,
Adrian
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 16:49, Barlow, Dustin wrote
-
From: Adrian Brock
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/30/2003 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy web-console.war e
rror
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:45, Adrian Brock wrote:
The problem is with the jboss.net deployer.
It opens the archive using a classloader.getResource
My guess is that the -p option on cygwin preserves the
file system permissions, but the other methods do not.
Regards,
Adrian
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 16:49, Barlow, Dustin wrote:
JBoss Version: 3.2.3
JVM: Sun 1.4.2-b28
OS: Windows 2000
Using windows explorer, I copied an unmodified all
PROTECTED] '
Subject: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy web-console.war error
JBoss Version: 3.2.3
JVM: Sun 1.4.2-b28
OS: Windows 2000
Using windows explorer, I copied an unmodified all server target directory
to foo. I then ran run.bat -c foo from the command line and I get
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy web-console.war
error
My guess is that the -p option on cygwin preserves the
file system permissions, but the other methods do not.
Regards,
Adrian
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 16:49, Barlow, Dustin wrote:
JBoss Version: 3.2.3
JVM: Sun 1.4.2-b28
with Administrator priviledges on the Windows 2000 box
and I have complete control over the directory tree that JBoss lives and
runs in.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Brock
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/30/2003 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy web
.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/30/2003 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy web-console.war
error
I tried the same proceedure on WinXP prosp1 using jboss-3.2.3 and sun
jdk-1.4.2_03
and I don't see this error.
09:08
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/30/2003 12:29 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] [jboss-3.2.3] Unable to deploy web-console.war e
rror
Please keep it on the list.
Try enabling TRACE logging in conf/log4j.xml
to see whether it provides any more information in log/server.log:
!-- TRACE
no further issues to speak of.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Moulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X
I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact
: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X
I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact that
it is no longer the container of choice. However I am not holding my
breath, as previous post seem to indicate that politics come before
innovation.
..
Mike
not familiar with sf.net
but if it is not too complicated I offer my help producing latest
JBoss+Jetty if there are not enough resources.
Original Message Follows
From: Rupp, Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X
: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:22:48 +0100
I would expect, that you can just take a jetty sar from
a previous release, remove the tomcat sar from deploy/
and put the jetty one in.
Heiko
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
, December 18, 2003 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X
I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact that
it is no longer the container of choice. However I am not holding my
breath, as previous post seem to indicate that politics come
Your question has been asked here (on 4/12/2003) and on JBoss Forums:
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=43294
But has not been answered.
I know JBoss have decided to move the default bundle back to including
Tomcat, but do they intend to also release a Jetty bundle with each
hi,
I downloaded the new JBoss 3.2.3 version. We are waiting for the Jetty
archive, but I tested our application with Tomcat, which should work. We
have an startup servlet, which should initialize some data. But we get
exception:
2003-12-01 11:27:02,265
INFO
Could you please increase the log level to trace for this same case?
category name=org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp
priority value=TRACE class=org.jboss.logging.XLevel/
/category
Thank you.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
I downloaded the new JBoss 3.2.3 version. We are waiting for the Jetty
At 12:28 01.12.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Could you please increase the log level to trace for this same case?
category name=org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp
priority value=TRACE class=org.jboss.logging.XLevel/
/category
Thank you.
no problem.
and this is the result:
2003-12-01
Unfortunately, I still can't reproduce it. Could you please provide me
with the DDs and instructions to reproduce this? Thank you.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 12:28 01.12.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Could you please increase the log level to trace for this same case?
category
At 17:31 01.12.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Unfortunately, I still can't reproduce it. Could you please provide me
with the DDs and instructions to reproduce this? Thank you.
We have problems with Tables, where one column names is name. Than I call
findAll() and call the getName() method. I
This is fixed in Branch_3_2 and HEAD.
The bug was that, the fields with read-time-out=-1 would never be loaded.
Thanks for the details.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 17:31 01.12.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Unfortunately, I still can't reproduce it. Could you please provide me
with the DDs and
Hallo,
I founfd JBoss 3.2.3 at SF.net.
Is it the production release or only release candidate? At jboss.org I se 3.2.2
only.
Thanks,
Jiri
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Its named 3.2.3RC1 for release candidate 1 status. Its not
the final 3.2.3 release.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I founfd JBoss 3.2.3 at SF.net.
Is it the production release or only
Title: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.3 and Oracle 9iR2
I am very sure, that there was a bug report concerning this, but I can't
find it at the moment.
Could you open a bug report or feature report describing what you did -
possibly including
a patch against 3.2.2 or Branch_3_2?
Heiko
64 matches
Mail list logo
