What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
Neal Sanche wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Oh, I am definitely using the servlet container in the same VM, and
although it's probably a really bad idea, I've been using Local
objects in my web view layer instead of constantly making value
objects all
yes it works well.
What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
Neal Sanche wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Oh, I am definitely using the servlet container in the same VM, and
although it's probably a really bad idea, I've been using Local
objects in my web view layer instead of
I know ;)
julien viet wrote:
yes it works well.
What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache,
On November 11, 2003 08:17 am, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
I know ;)
julien viet wrote:
yes it works well.
What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
Brilliant idea. I keep forgetting about filters. That'll really
simplify things, won't it? I'll give it a shot right away.
-Neal
Hi All,
I've found recently that it's becoming increasingly painful to avoid
the 'CMR Collection cannot be modified outside of a transaction' when
navigating down CMR many relations. Navigating down a 1 to 1 relation
works fine. The thing is, all I'm trying to do is easily display
information
First, it is the spec requirement.
Second, do you run Servlet container in the same VM as JBoss? If so, you
could begin/commit transaction in the web layer and no need for value
objects.
Neal Sanche wrote:
Hi All,
I've found recently that it's becoming increasingly painful to avoid
the 'CMR
Hi Alexey,
Oh, I am definitely using the servlet container in the same VM, and
although it's probably a really bad idea, I've been using Local
objects in my web view layer instead of constantly making value
objects all the time. This works fine until CMR collections are
involved. Beginning a