[JBoss-user] Strange problem in starting.

2003-06-23 Thread Ramrakhiani, Vikas
Hi, I am experiencing a strange problem in starting up Jboss 3.2.0. Whenever I run commend run.sh -c all Jboss hangs up, 19:23:04,811 INFO [SARDeployer] looking for nested deployments in : file:/tmp_mnt/home/hyd/fs2/u9/ramrakhv/jboss_11000/jboss-3.2.0_tomcat-4.1.24 /server/all/deploy/cluster-se

[JBoss-user] strange problem with Oracle and JBoss 2.4.9/Tomcat4.0.4

2002-11-18 Thread michael . brohl
Hi all, we are using the above JBoss/Tomcat Bundle with Oracle 8.1.7 (classes12 driver) on a Linux machine (SuSE 8.1). Data requests return the expected number of datarows but every returned data field is empty! There are no errors connecting to Oracle and the fact that there are datasets returne

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-17 Thread Peter Shillan
Hi All, Can the people who next respond to this thread *PLEASE* trim their posts? Digest format can be long enough but this is making it enormous. Many thanks, --gps E-mail is an informal method of communication and may

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-17 Thread rahul ganjoo
In our case the parallelism is a requirement. We wait for threads to return and then proceed. So ideally we would want to send messages to a q where they get consumed simultaneously. Pete Beck wrote: > I'm not entirely sure how this would be handled in JBoss, but in > principle you could send ou

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-17 Thread Pete Beck
I'm not entirely sure how this would be handled in JBoss, but in principle you could send out a bunch of JMS messages to a topic or queue. The EJB container then launches threads to process the messages through MDB instances. Therefore potentially, your code will be executed in parallel. Of cour

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-17 Thread rahul ganjoo
Hi Pete! What was being acheived using threads obviously was some parallelism...as in we wanted some actions to be executed simulataneously. Now I have not worked with MDBs,JMS etc yet. Are you suggesting using MDBs its possible to acheive the same and avoid violating the spec? Any ellaboration is

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-17 Thread Pete Beck
; > Mob: +353 86 824 9736 > > Fax: +353 1 873 3612 > > > > "rahul ganjoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 15.10.2002 13:46 > > Please respond to jboss-user > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &g

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-17 Thread Pete Beck
I think there is a very simple solution to this which is much safer. Instead of triggering threads off in your class, move the thread body into a MDB and then simply send several messages from your session bean. The MDB will enable your code to run asynchronously which is probably the effect you

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-16 Thread Michael Bartmann
>I am looking forward to some good design practices on Worker Thread >examples. > >TIA, >Saroj > > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marius >Kotsbak >Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 3:00 AM >

Re: RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-16 Thread rahul ganjoo
Thanks Dude,I appreciate the help.. funnily enough we got it to work somehow though the design needs to change... - Original Message - From: "Geer, Benjamin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:53 pm Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-16 Thread saroj kumar
Marius Kotsbak Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 3:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux saroj kumar wrote: >HI All, > >I am facing "Transaction Timeout " exception while running >the code on Redhat Linux 7.3/JDK1.4/JBOSS 3.0.3/Ora

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-16 Thread Geer, Benjamin
rahul ganjoo wrote: > Yes Ofcourse the EJB spec doesnt recommend threading > in EJBs... It specifically *prohibits* threading. Section 24.1.2 of the EJB 2.0 spec says: "The enterprise bean must not attempt to manage threads. The enterprise bean must not attempt to start, stop, suspend, or resum

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-16 Thread Geer, Benjamin
rahul ganjoo wrote: > Yes Ofcourse the EJB spec doesnt recommend threading > in EJBs... Section 24.1.2 of the EJB 2.0 spec says: An enterprise Bean must not use thread synchronization primitives to synchronize execution of multiple instances. --

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-15 Thread rahul ganjoo
gt; > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject:Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux > > Guys any help with this would be much appreciated. > I am repeating the scenario here: > Environment: Jboss 3.0.3 ,Red hat Linux 7.2 > >

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-15 Thread Jonathan . O'Connor
ECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.10.2002 13:46 Please respond to jboss-user To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux Guys any help with this would be much appreciated. I am repeating the scenario here: Environment: Jbos

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-15 Thread rahul ganjoo
ead.run > (AbstractDeploymentScanner.java:202) > > "Thread-3" daemon prio=1 tid=0x0x4d483d80 nid=0x5d9 waiting on monitor > [4e123000..4e12386c] > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x44c52c70> (a java.util.TaskQueue) >

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-14 Thread saroj kumar
at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:159) "Reference Handler" daemon prio=1 tid=0x0x80b1748 nid=0x5cf waiting on monitor [4c4c1000..4c4c186c] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x44afa740> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-12 Thread Bill Burke
tsbak > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux > > > saroj kumar wrote: > > >HI All, > > > >I am facing "Transaction Timeout " exception while running > >the code on Redhat

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-12 Thread Alex Loubyansky
Hello saroj, it can be a locking problem. Is there a chance the second call spawns a thread that calls entity bean that is currently involved in the transaction initiated by the first call? Why it doesn't happen on windows?.. Probably, on windows the transaction needs less time to complete. May i

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-11 Thread Marius Kotsbak
saroj kumar wrote: HI All, I am facing "Transaction Timeout " exception while running the code on Redhat Linux 7.3/JDK1.4/JBOSS 3.0.3/Oracle9i. Same code is working fine on Win2k/JBOSS 3.0.3/jdk1.4/Oracle9i. Scenario is: UI Layer makes a call to SLSB. This SLSB makes a call to another SLSB w

[JBoss-user] Strange Problem on Linux

2002-10-11 Thread saroj kumar
HI All, I am facing "Transaction Timeout " exception while running the code on Redhat Linux 7.3/JDK1.4/JBOSS 3.0.3/Oracle9i. Same code is working fine on Win2k/JBOSS 3.0.3/jdk1.4/Oracle9i. Scenario is: UI Layer makes a call to SLSB. This SLSB makes a call to another SLSB which uses a class. T

[JBoss-user] Strange Problem

2002-09-05 Thread Saroj Kumar
Hi All, I faced a strange problem just now. Jboss3.0 + win2k + ORACLE9i + SSB + CMP EB + classes12.zip I have got a Session Bean which makes a call to an CMP Entity Bean to Update the record. I pass some java.lang.Double Values To the Entity Bean from Session Bean. In Session Bean, We convert B

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange problem

2002-04-08 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
Hi, > Here is log for which the error is coming. [snip] > [2002-04-09 10:32:07,587; JAWSPersistenceManager] > java.sql.SQLException: Lost connection to server during query (I think, here > is the problem) > [2002-04-09 10:32:07,596; JAWSPersistenceManager] > java.sql.SQLException: Lost connecti

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange problem

2002-04-08 Thread Joost v.d. Wijgerd
6:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] Strange problem Hi Everybody I am facing a very strange problem in my application which is running in Jboss. I am creating a "Request" in my application and saving that "Request" in the database(MySql), that mean, I inse

Re: [JBoss-user] Strange problem

2002-04-07 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
If you could post a stack trace it would help. cheers dim - Original Message - From: "Mahesh Agarwal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:54 PM Subject: [JBoss-user] Strange problem > Hi Everybody > > I am faci

[JBoss-user] Strange problem

2002-04-07 Thread Mahesh Agarwal
Hi Everybody I am facing a very strange problem in my application which is running in Jboss. I am creating a "Request" in my application and saving that "Request" in the database(MySql), that mean, I inserted a new row in a table. When I come to my application again to see that "Request" , the

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange problem with BMP entity bean caching - incorrect values found by findByPrimaryKey()

2001-09-17 Thread Adam Lipscombe
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] Strange problem with BMP entity bean caching - incorrect values found by findByPrimaryKey() Yes, that's it - you have hit the nail on the head. The transaction attrib for modifyDetails was "supports".   You live and learn   Thanks very much!  

RE: [JBoss-user] Strange problem with BMP entity bean caching - incorrect values found by findByPrimaryKey()

2001-09-17 Thread Herve Tchepannou
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] Strange problem with BMP entity bean caching - incorrect values found by findByPrimaryKey() What is the transaction setting of ur bean and modifyDetails()? are u sure that they are at 'Required'? -Original Message- From: Adam Lipscombe [mai

[JBoss-user] Strange problem with BMP entity bean caching - incorrect values found by findByPrimaryKey()

2001-09-17 Thread Adam Lipscombe
Folks, JBoss 2.4.0 with Tomcat 3.2.3 - I have a strange problem that has completely foxed me: The sequence of events on a BMP entity bean is as follows. All steps are called from a client in separate transactions: 1. Bean Created 2. Bean Read State OK at this p