On lør, 2002-06-08 at 01:33, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It is not about performance it's about manageability in production.
Widows is simple too much of a pain to manage on a large scale.
-dain
For example, what do you do when running jboss on win and need to fix
something somewhere only
I think that the difference is litte if you use the best jdks on both
platforms (ibm/sun 1.4 for linux), but linux is far more stable and
easier to work with than windows. We run on SuSE.de. And I think linux
has a better memory/swap/disk-handling than win. It utilizes most of the
memory for
.
The only problem is that it doesn't like the phread lib on my debian
unstable.
http://www.jrockit.com
Maris
-Original Message-
From: Marius Kotsbak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user
-user] performance on linux/windows
I think that the difference is litte if you use the best jdks on both
platforms (ibm/sun 1.4 for linux), but linux is far more stable and
easier to work with than windows. We run on SuSE.de. And I think linux
has a better memory/swap/disk-handling than win
It is not about performance it's about manageability in production.
Widows is simple too much of a pain to manage on a large scale.
-dain
Tejeshwar wrote:
Hi..
I want to know one thing.
My question,
JBoss on windows/linux, which gives better performance?
whether
