Hi Scott,
Possibly would be very good to have a build command that does that plus
precompiles the JSPs.
Thanks!
Simone
- Original Message -
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: Re
Yes that is currently required, and no such a configuration does not
exist. This could be handled in the netboot server via filter that
compressed any unpackaged deployments automatically.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
f Of Scott
Rehorn
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] netboot in 3.2
Thanks for the reply Jeremy. I think I resolved my problem-- I made a
goofy mistake setting library locations in the environment on my remote
system which had me chasing
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] netboot in 3.2
I am trying to set up netboot in 3.2.0 RC4 on win2k, and it isn't working for me. Hopefully someone can set me straight.
- I built a netboot.war file based on the skeleton in the example with a directory tree in it like this: nbconfig/server/de
f Of
> Lennart Petersson
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] netboot in 3.2
>
>
> Hi Jeremy!
>
> Not looked at this to much but since your on... does this handle some
> kind of local caching, meaning t
Hi Jeremy!
Not looked at this to much but since your on... does this handle some
kind of local caching, meaning that if the next time I start JBoss and
there is for some reason no contact with the WebDAV server - will JBoss
boot from the local cache instead? If not, is it planned to do? We have
Netboot in 3.2 changed significantly as documented in change note 660839
The listContent JSP is no longer needed - instead you just need to make
your config available on a WebDAV enabled server and provide the
location to the client.
For example, if your installation is located at
http://boothost
> Are you saying netboot is going away, or are you talking about the
> configuration? If it's the configuration, that seems to change
> dramatically
> with every major release, so I just assume that will be a problem.
> Unfortunately, I can't wait... :)
No, hopefully it will now be easier to set
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Thanks for your help on this.
> You know this will all change in 3.2, right?
Are you saying netboot is going away, or are you talking about the
configuration? If it's the configuration, that seems to change dramatically
with every major release, so I just assume that will b
You know this will all change in 3.2, right?
For 3.0.4, gnu-regexp.jar should be on the boot classpath as it's added
with the jmxLibs. Can you check the access log for the boot host and
verify a) that that jar is actually being requested, and b) that the
host server has the file in that location.
:80/netboot/lib";, and I am off to
the races! I also load any deployable apps as well like this.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sonnek, Ryan
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
/lib/*.jar
files or are they required to be in the jboss/server//lib?
sorry for the questions, but i can't seem to find docs about this.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Jason Westra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBos
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Jencks
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Netboot issues
Probably the file lists are out of date... we should look for a way to make
the lists generated dynamically fro
Probably the file lists are out of date... we should look for a way to make
the lists generated dynamically from the build. I don't think crimson.jar
is used in any 3.0++ version any more.
I haven't tried this stuff, where are the files one needs?
thanks
david jencks
On 2002.10.10 16:16:08 -04
rius
> Kotsbak
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Netboot
>
>
> On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 00:44, Bill Burke wrote:
> > Don't understand why you need the JBoss server A. Why not just
> communicate
> > directl
> If they lie on a central server, then he only sees the interfaces, but
> has no access to class files of the EJB implementations (please
> correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> He has the swing-app, but he has not the required EJBs.
You could always place a delegate layer on the client and have
it swi
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:50:16 -0700, you wrote:
>You might think about configuring the demo to use JBoss internal Hypersonic database,
>which would negate the requirement that the demo communicate with your machine. Then
>it
>becomes a problem of populating the database with data. If its a lot
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:44:57 -0400, you wrote:
>Don't understand why you need the JBoss server A. Why not just communicate
>directly to B?
You're right, actually the server A is not really necessary.
>
>Anyways. You could write a JRMPInvoker that simply forwards requests to
>Server B. You ma
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 00:44, Bill Burke wrote:
> Don't understand why you need the JBoss server A. Why not just communicate
> directly to B?
>
> Anyways. You could write a JRMPInvoker that simply forwards requests to
> Server B. You may have to worry about firewalls and such too.
>
> Let us k
You might think about configuring the demo to use JBoss internal Hypersonic database,
which would negate the requirement that the demo communicate with your machine. Then
it
becomes a problem of populating the database with data. If its a lot of data, then
perhaps your original idea is better.
Don't understand why you need the JBoss server A. Why not just communicate
directly to B?
Anyways. You could write a JRMPInvoker that simply forwards requests to
Server B. You may have to worry about firewalls and such too.
Let us know if you ever implement this.
Bill
> -Original Messag
I would investigate whether you can make a partially functional demo
version of your app using the all-java hsqldb that comes with jboss: then
the entire app + jboss can be downloaded via netboot. I would expect the
trip between jboss instances in your proposal would give users an
unrealistically
22 matches
Mail list logo
