Hi all
Hey i wanna know whether there is any jabber client that supports zero
authentication. Since i have tried with jabber client installed on my m/c but
thatasks always u to enter your username and password. But Zero Knowledge
authentication requires u to only send your username and
Hi all
Actually i wanna ask when we register a user then that info is stored on the
server in normal text form which can be misused soi wanted some way
of registering the user so that we can store passwords in encrypted format on
the server
thanxGirish
Is there one - what's the address?
Wouldn't the solution be that all servers and transports have to do some
Public Key based authentication on first connection?
Personally I'm fairly new to messaging and became interested more from the
live XML data communications face of Jabber, and as a
What I would recommend if you want to protect your users from messages
of this type is blocking all messages from people not on the roster,
this should be fairly watertight... Maybe things could be setup so
that all messages received from users not on the roster are forwarded
to another JID
Uhm... did I mention ..
x xmlns="jabber:x:advertisement"
image_urlhttp://www.mysoftware.com/bannerads/buy.jpg/image_url
urlhttp://www.mysoftware.com/bannerads/default.htm/url
tracking_noAE9323DEFGH123/tracking_no
/x
- Duncan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Title: RE: [JDEV] Relationship with .NET?
Can you guys please take this elsewhere unless you are going to give explicit examples of how Jabber development will relate to .NET.
Thanks
P.S. Just because a company with a lot of money backs something, doesn't mean it is great.
RE: [JDEV] Relationship with .NET?From: Colin Madere
Subject: RE: [JDEV] Relationship with .NET?
Can you guys please take this elsewhere unless you are going to give
explicit examples of how Jabber development will relate to .NET.
Thanks
Err, I believe I did earlier.
P.S. Just because a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 5:05 PM
However, even though spam isn't a problem yet on the
Jabber network, there will come a day when it is does
become a problem. Once there are enough users of
Jabber,
Agreed. Spam doesn't have to be a problem with jabber or any IM that allows one to
reject messages or even subscription requests from unknowns.
4/11/01 10:43:40 PM, "Neeme Praks" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 5:05 PM
However, even though spam isn't a problem yet on the
Jabber network, there will come a day when it is does
become a problem. Once there are enough users of
Jabber,
Actually, I like the thought of rate-limiting. If they can only send two subscription
requests per minute, they would be discouraged from trying to bulk-subscribe. Also, if
they could only resolve two search matches per minute, they would be discouraged from
walking the list and
Ok, SourceForge is way too slow. I just decided to lose my existing
history and import directly into CVS. It is now up and running. You can
download via anonymous access using:
$ cvs
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jabbertest
login
$ cvs -z3
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jabbertest
From: Jens Alfke
Subject: Re: [JDEV] voice chat ...
is it http://www.tellme.com ?
they use voiceXML
But that doesn't appear to be voice chat, rather voice recognition.
Close, but more along the lines of interactive voice response. VoiceXML
is method to provide computer telephony scripting..
Interesting, I think I'd like to implement something along these lines, but
needs pinning down...
One big vague architectural solution is to establish some kind of "web
of trust" where transitive buddyhood ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is unknown to me but
is on one of my buddy's buddy lists) is used as
Ah, but have you tried downloading and registering an new ICQ account?
Sure
when you have set it up it's OK, but as soon as you have registered a new
account within a few seconds you get spam'd!
Not wanting to turn this list into a spam discussion, but I have a very low
iCQ number, and you'd
Actually, I like the thought of rate-limiting. If they can only send two
subscription requests per minute, they would be discouraged from trying to
bulk-subscribe. Also, if they could only resolve
two search matches per minute, they would be discouraged from walking the list and
After an upgrade to 1.4.1, things were mostly quiet until today, when
jabberd took a very ungraceful dive, twice. All I found in the logs
were:
@40003ad49bfc2c7752dc aim_tx_new: ERROR: no connection specified
@40003ad49bfd0ad24d44 unknown capability!
@40003ad49bfd0adae094 unknown
Hi rjan
In case you are still struggling (I don't see any further msgs in this
thread) - I'll put in my two pence
silly things out of the way first:
are you sure the service id="jud"host. stuff isn't between
XML comments (!-- ... --) so that the jabberd isn't able to find
the instance
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:21:11AM -0700, Jens Alfke wrote:
But the client shouldn't need to send a probe at all. The server will
s/shouldn't need/ought not/
probe is for servers; clients shouldn't be doing them...
send you presence elements from your subscribed buddies right after
[Citation date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:49:35 +1000]
Oliver == Oliver George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver Sorry for the conspiricy theory: i've no doubt .NET will
Oliver be great else MS wouldn't back it so hard. but tell us
Oliver why.
I'll second the request to take the .NET discussion
Sorry, I helped rjan out with his problem.
The first problem was using the server name instead of another unique name
(like 'jud.servername')
The second problem was that there is a service block to add to the jsm
block for reported services for browse and agents requests, and a service
block
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:28:57PM -0600, David Waite wrote:
Sorry, I helped rjan out with his problem.
The first problem was using the server name instead of another unique name
(like 'jud.servername')
The second problem was that there is a service block to add to the jsm
block for
How about having a way for a client to report a message as spam, it
could send back an iq with the message content and sender, then if
one user or message is reported many times as spam it will start to be
blocked, have to be thought out well so as to not allow loop holes for
abuse.
I like
On Wednesday, April 11, 2001, at 01:17 PM, Todd Bradley wrote:
I like the idea. But what's to stop that user from just creating a new JID?
We might just see a lot of one-time JIDs pop up as happens with email spam
now.
If Jabber really takes off, someone will create a special Jabber server for
24 matches
Mail list logo
