hi
anyone of you is able to port/compile XMPP Client Daemon on a unix or
MacOSX platform?
Me is not an experienced linux user thus i don't know much about
these platforms...
project infos are on
http://xcd.jabberstudio.org/
cvs is on sourceforge.
regards,
Edrin
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
1. Give Money
The sooner you give, the sooner the software will exist for you and everyone
else. We are taking donations via PayPal and 100% of what you give will go
directly to the programmer. Downhill Battle has a solid track record of
getting projects out the door, and we are going
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GAIM-Integrated Filesharing
snip/
As far as I can see, this message if off-topic for the JDEV list. If
off-topic posts continue to be received from the sender, the list admin
(me) will take appropriate actions, which may include holding
Allowing self signed (or otherwise untrusted) certs with STARTTLS +
EXTERNAL is opening yourself up for a serious security breach. Using it
with stream:features over dialback would give you encryption with a self
signed cert and trust through the DNS system. STARTTLS + Dialback
offers some level
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
JD Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allowing self signed (or otherwise untrusted) certs with STARTTLS +
EXTERNAL is opening yourself up for a serious security breach.
Well, that's another story. But that claim on the URL I provided was
that it is technically
While JD's comments sum this up nicely, I just want to reiterate loudly that
self-signed certificates alone truly are worthless. I'm not even talking
about man in the middle attacks either. As a form of identity, a self-signed
cert is as effective as the From: header in good old SMTP, and
On Thursday 11 November 2004 04:53 pm, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
JD Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allowing self signed (or otherwise untrusted) certs with STARTTLS +
EXTERNAL is opening yourself up for a serious security breach.
Well, that's another story.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 11 November 2004 05:06 pm, Justin Karneges wrote:
While JD's comments sum this up nicely, I just want to reiterate loudly
that self-signed certificates alone truly are worthless. I'm not even
talking about man in the middle attacks
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:54:49 -0800, Neil Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, remember that different people have different threat models to
address. Someone in the old hypothetical revolutionary conspiracy can't
afford to depend on large institutional corporations to sign their
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
JD Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allowing self signed (or otherwise untrusted) certs with STARTTLS +
EXTERNAL is opening yourself up for a serious security breach.
Well, that's another story. But that claim on the URL I provided was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 11 November 2004 09:44 pm, David Waite wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:54:49 -0800, Neil Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, remember that different people have different threat models to
address. Someone in the old hypothetical
Justin Karneges wrote:
That said, on the subject of caching, XMPP servers should be a bit more strict
than most of us probably are with ssh, if only to curb spam. Using dialback
on the first connection might be acceptable.
And now that I think about it, the whole use dialback for the first
12 matches
Mail list logo
