Do anyone know the JEP
which defines the protocol about how to filter some message (e.g. I wish to
pull some guy to the blacklist and never get his message forever)?
Do anyone know the JEP which defines the protocol about how to filter
some message (e.g. I wish to pull some guy to the blacklist and never
get his message forever)?
RFC 3921, Section 10: http://www.xmpp.org/specs/rfc3921.html#privacy
cheers,
Remko
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:47:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the protocol itself does not seem to have a defined keep-alive
element, what is the recommended way for a client to keep its connection
alive to a XMPP server ?
Since XML allows any number of whitespace
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:53:38PM +0800, Tang Yongbo wrote:
Do anyone know the JEP which defines the protocol about how to filter some
message (e.g. I wish to pull some guy to the blacklist and never get his
message forever)?
XMPP-IM, section about privacy lists.
--
There are two
Hello.
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
--
Igor Goryachev E-Mail/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/19/06, Michal vorner Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:47:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the protocol itself does not seem to have a defined keep-alive
element, what is the recommended way for a client to keep its connection
alive to a
Thanks Remko and Michal vorner Vaner。
But my question is not just blocking somebody's message. I want to make
a filter rule, and apply it to the server to block anything as I like,
including the IQ/message/presence package.
For example, If Server receives something as followed and I
On Monday 19 June 2006 17:08, Igor Goryachev wrote:
Hello.
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
It would be quite possible to implement, but I'm not familiar with a server
which offers this
On 19 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
It would be quite possible to implement, but I'm not familiar with a
server which offers this functionality out
On 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote:
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
It would be quite possible to implement, but I'm not familiar with a
server which offers this functionality out of
Well, it primarily means that the user should have several equitable
jabber-accounts on each domain with one roster, vCARD, offline storage
spool and other things. The service should be with s2s enabled.
Maybe this can help:
http://www.jabber.org/jeps/inbox/forwarding-delivery.html
On Monday 19 June 2006 21:37, Tony Finch wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote:
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
Forwarding is difficult in Jabber because it is closed-loop
On 19 Jun 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
Forwarding is difficult in Jabber because it is closed-loop whereas
email is open-loop.
Could you please explain this
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote:
On 19 Jun 2006, Tony Finch wrote:
Consider what happens if I send a presence subscription request to an
alias JID, and get a response from the real JID. Will my client behave
sensibly?
Well, I suppose you will just have a dead JID in your roster
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote:
Could you please explain this moment a bit wider? It might be important
for me.
It's from control theory. In an open loop control system I just send the
system messages to tell it how to behave, whereas in a closed loop system
I get messages back so I
Op maandag 19 juni 2006 12:23, schreef Igor Goryachev:
On 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote:
I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is it possible at
all?
It would be quite possible to implement, but I'm not
That is a good point! Then you can have multiple jabber accounts (1 for each transport) in use on 1 account!
On 6/19/06, Sander Devrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op maandag 19 juni 2006 12:23, schreef Igor Goryachev: On 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote: I have several domains and want to
but it's not pure forwarding?
On 6/19/06, Sander Devrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op maandag 19 juni 2006 12:23, schreef Igor Goryachev: On 19 Jun 2006, Igor Goryachev wrote: I have several domains and want to implement something similar to
mail-like aliases (not virtual hosts) in jabber? Is
Hey Tang,
If you are using Wildfire then you can use the
contentFilter plugin: http://www.jivesoftware.org/wildfire/plugins.jsp.
Out of the box the plugin can filter messages and presences. If you need to
filter IQ packets you can either modify the plugin or just copy the idea and
build a
On Mon Jun 19 08:15:40 2006, Sergei Golovan wrote:
On 6/19/06, Michal vorner Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:47:19PM -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the protocol itself does not seem to have a
defined keep-alive
element, what is the recommended way
On 6/19/06, Dave Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon Jun 19 08:15:40 2006, Sergei Golovan wrote:
So, some NATs and proxies still break connection if they don't see
bidirectional flow.
Could you tell me which NATs do this? I'm unaware of any that handle
timeouts differently for
Thank Gato. I got
the key that there is no such JEP.
I think contentFilter is
significant. If there is a content Filter or function filter，the users will be so
convenient that they could redefine the Jabber to their style and cut down
exchanged packets to extend the application of the
22 matches
Mail list logo
