Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Peter Saint-Andre wrote: The XSF will hold its 6th XMPP Summit in Brussels on February 7-9. The first day (Saturday) will be held at FOSDEM 2009, featuring public talks for larger audiences and perhaps a birthday party to celebrate the 10th anniversary of Jabber technologies. The second

Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Peter Saint-Andre wrote: http://xmpp.org/summit/summit6.shtml Great. A question to day 2: I guess the priority will be on XMPP as Skype replacement, so RTP over Jingle, ICE-UDP and friends. But we should also have a discussion about the future of Jingle for TCP-like requirements like

Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Dirk Meyer wrote: Peter Saint-Andre wrote: http://xmpp.org/summit/summit6.shtml Great. A question to day 2: I guess the priority will be on XMPP as Skype replacement, so RTP over Jingle, ICE-UDP and friends. But we should also have a discussion about the future of Jingle for TCP-like

Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Dirk Meyer wrote: Peter Saint-Andre wrote: http://xmpp.org/summit/summit6.shtml Great. A question to day 2: I guess the priority will be on XMPP as Skype replacement, so RTP over Jingle, ICE-UDP and friends. But we should also have a discussion about the future of

Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Am 10.12.2008 um 20:11 schrieb Dirk Meyer: Great. A question to day 2: I guess the priority will be on XMPP as Skype replacement, so RTP over Jingle, ICE-UDP and friends. But we should also have a discussion about the future of Jingle for TCP-like requirements like file-transfer and e2e streams

[jdev] Case sensitivity in JIDs

I'm running into a problem with sending messages directly to resources which I think is related to case sensitivity, so I wanted to make sure I am understanding the spec right. Should [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Resource be the same as [EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource? (This is using ejabberd) I switched

Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 10.12.2008 um 20:11 schrieb Dirk Meyer: Great. A question to day 2: I guess the priority will be on XMPP as Skype replacement, so RTP over Jingle, ICE-UDP and friends. But we should also have a discussion about the future of Jingle for TCP-like requirements like

Re: [jdev] Case sensitivity in JIDs

Thanks for the info. Will adjust my logic accordingly. arne On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Arne Claassen wrote: I'm running into a problem with sending messages directly to resources which I think is related to case sensitivity, so I

Re: [jdev] Case sensitivity in JIDs

Thanks for the info. Will adjust my logic accordingly. Actually, if you just stringprep every Jid (which you should do to be correct anyway), then comparing Jids will be done correctly automatically for you; no need for logic. cheers, Remko ___ JDev

Re: [jdev] XMPP Summit

Remko Tronçon wrote: Great. I would like to have a small group of people not busy hacking and doing inter-op tests to discuss a future ICE-TCP-like XEP. Well, I can imagine most of the people involved in Jingle hacking are also very likely to be interested in ICE-TCP, so it would be a shame

Re: [jdev] Free jabber services

I used Psi, Spark and my own client. All of them can not connect to jabber.org. What clients can connect to server? Thanks. Best, -- javanesevn javanesevn's Profile: http://www.jabberforum.org/member.php?userid=17324

[jdev] Presence - how often?

How often should a client send xmpp presence to a server? I assume most XMPP servers usually have a timeout for client idle and the presence should be sent at a value that is less than this timeout to be optimal. But if you are talking to some third party xmpp server, you wouldnt know their

Re: [jdev] Presence - how often?

Adi wrote: How often should a client send xmpp presence to a server? I assume most XMPP servers usually have a timeout for client idle and the presence should be sent at a value that is less than this timeout to be optimal. But if you are talking to some third party xmpp server, you wouldnt