On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote:
XMPP sucks because the namespaces are incredibly inconsistent, XML
stream resets suck, and Jingle breaks all of the elegant simplicity
(likely necessarily).
Man, I feel guilty for writing that.
XDA meeting really.
Hi, my name is Pedro
OK, I came up with a theme for this meeting: Why I Hate XMPP. :)
The idea of a groupchat sounds pretty neat, but I'm a bit worried
about the anarchy that the subject entails. Looking at the thread, it
feels like everybody will just be bringing up his/her personal gripes
about XMPP, all of which
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I just started looking at Sphinx, which is used to produce documentation
for Python and lots of other projects:
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
It looks intriguing to me.
We started using it for Freevo some weeks ago and we like it. It is a
very good documentation system.
On 3/10/2009 4:37 PM, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Brett Zamir bret...@yahoo.com
mailto:bret...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nice idea... I'd like to add lack of full XML and namespace
support (ok, maybe not XML with notations, external DTDs, etc.,
but processing
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Brett Zamir bret...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, yes, but there are issues such as these in the specs:
1) RFC3920bis-09: for historical reasons MAY accept only the 'stream:'
prefix
2) RFC3921bis-08: The show/ element MUST NOT possess any attributes.
(also with
On Mar 9, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/9/09 9:05 AM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 09.03.2009 um 13:28 schrieb Guillaume Desmottes:
proxy.jabber.org doesn't seem to work.
It has been removed a while ago.
I'm hoping to bring that back soon. :)
Yeah, I remember seeing
On 3/10/09 6:02 AM, Pedro Melo wrote:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/9/09 9:05 AM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 09.03.2009 um 13:28 schrieb Guillaume Desmottes:
proxy.jabber.org doesn't seem to work.
It has been removed a while ago.
I'm hoping to bring that back
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Ajay Kapur ajay.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way through jabberd or any of the other servers to have a
given client automatically subscribe to presence updates from all new
users when they register? You can assume that this client will always
be
Hi,
2009/3/9 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a venue
for community discussion. I'm calling this the Monthly XMPP Meeting or
MXM (you can pronounce it like mix 'em). I propose that we hold the
first discussion this
On 3/10/09 2:48 PM, Tuomas Koski wrote:
Hi,
2009/3/9 Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
I think it would be valuable to hold a groupchat once a month as a venue
for community discussion. I'm calling this the Monthly XMPP Meeting or
MXM (you can pronounce it like mix 'em). I propose that
I'd like to bring up a topic: Directed presences.
IMO, as they are now, they are quite useless. One might even consider
that a bug in the RFC :).
--
Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___
JDev mailing list
Forum:
As posted at my blog
***
I have this vision for jabber.org services:
1. A clean and simple website with minimal text that will help end
users get started with Jabber.
2. Web chat for a real-time window into one end-user chatroom and one
developer chatroom (and perhaps one additional
Awesomelooks like a great vision to me!
Hope it becomes a reality.
Geof Lambert | 916.225.6769
Chat: Google Talk: geof.lambert Skype: geof.lambert MSN:
geof.lamb...@gmail.com
Contact Me: [image: Linkedin] http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoflambert[image:
Twitter]
On 3/10/09 5:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
1. A clean and simple website with minimal text that will help end
users get started with Jabber.
2. Web chat for a real-time window into one end-user chatroom and one
developer chatroom (and perhaps one additional room, such as a
14 matches
Mail list logo
