Chalk this up to old fashioned email usage, but why do people keep
forking threads? First it was the XHTML-IM thread, now it's the State
of our Code-bases -- can't we all just talk on one topic under the
same name?
D.
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:41:36 +0200, Bart van Bragt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a fair amount of functionality in the last stable release of
Twisted that should help you with the socket management, XML parsing
and xpathish sort of operations.
It's not a full server, but it may be a useful start.
D.
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:49:20 -0600, Jason Ish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very cool! I'm glad to see someone besides myself using the Jabber
support in Twisted. :)
D.
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:29:02 +1000, James Bunton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
Please check out the new MSN transport available. It has been completely
re-written using Python and Twisted.
Greetings,
I would offer one thought about this Should I implement Experimental JEPs
question that seems to be arising from the discussion about certification.
The original point of the JEP was that it was an extension PROPOSAL and as
such, it was assumed that whomever was making the proposal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 27, 2004, at 5:45 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 4.4 on a VPS account -- I couldn't get Twisted
installed (which proxy65 relies on) and working correctly, so I
started
looking for another solution.
What issues did you encounter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The component stuff should work with most Jabber servers out there. The
client stuff is also fine. Feature support is not as extensive as I'd
like it, but it'll get there.
Twisted is great if you want to build any sort of server-side component
that
On Oct 25, 2003, at 1:00 AM, Nicholas Perez wrote:
Currently, writing components against the 1.4 codebase (externally or
internally) is just a Bad Idea. Lots of not well thought out cruft has
been growing like a slime mold over the past couple of years. Things
have still not been standardized
On Thursday, Sep 4, 2003, at 14:29 America/Denver, Andrew Sayers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aside: thanks to PGP, you can be sure that, despite the hack, my
messages haven't been tampered with :)
Unfortunately, GPG reports that your key is expired, so technically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+2
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 19:45 America/Denver, Paul Curtis wrote:
I normally avoid all of the conflicts surrounding JEPs, as I am rather
content to implement than to propose. However, in my one year of
active participation in the Jabber
Has anyone thought about creating a centralized user directory? There
could be an optional s2s component for the server implementations, and
perhaps a direct c2s protocol that clients could implement, as well.
If such a project were started, it would be a good idea to fold presence
into it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 14:34 America/Denver,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with the whole Jabber philosophy, we don't need a big jabber.org
community site, we need several smaller sites with good setups - I
think
of a *good* WWW presentation
On Tuesday, Mar 11, 2003, at 16:06 America/Denver, Frank Koenen wrote:
can anyone give me insight on the following lines of code in the
function dialback_out_read() in dialback.c:
/* make sure we're not connecting to ourselves */
if( ghash_get( c-d-in_id, xmlnode_get_attrib( x ,
On Tuesday, Nov 19, 2002, at 21:12 America/Denver, McGovern, Gerard wrote:
This email is confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it.
I'm not the intended recipient..I better not tell anyone about this email I guess. Hope no
On Friday, Nov 8, 2002, at 13:05 America/Denver, Simon Guindon wrote:
Rob and myself feel this is still something that should be fixed in the
Jabber.org SCM, I'm told this is a component by Jabber Inc. I would
greatly appreciate if this could be fixed in future versions. All is
fixed
on my
For the record, I find this distasteful.
Diz
On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 01:09 , dave wrote:
International Dating Etiquette CAUCASIAN WOMAN First date You get to kiss her goodnight Second date You get to grope all over and make out Third date You get to have sex in the missionary position
In general any interoperability work with Exchange would be interesting
to the Jabber community, I would imagine. By all means let's see some
code! :)
Diz
On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 07:17 , Martin Mrvka wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to build a jabber transport for microsofts
No, just a simple thanks and job well done. :)
diz
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 02:50 , Matthias Wimmer wrote:
Hi Dave!
Dave Smith wrote:
Many of you on these lists have seen many posts by a guy named Peter
St. Andre. Over the past 2-3 years, St. Peter (as we affectionately
know him
I appreciate all the commentary and brain-power being sunk into the emoticon
issue, but at the same time, I'm a little tired of having to clean my email
box of 20+ messages several times a day. Is there any chance of moving this
discussion to it's own mailing list so that other questions don't
On 4/11/02 10:58 PM, nitin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to know if there is a patch or some kind of fix for the
current Yahoo problem of not able to log in using the yahoo transport. If
so, where can i get it If not, then I'll like to know how long will this
problem exist and
On 4/9/02 6:36 AM, Stephen Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what happened to the SCM that was on tigris.org ? I notice
the JECL was moved to jabbersturdio, but I can't find the SCM now.
I'm investigating this. :) Let you know as soon as I know.
Diz
As a member of the Council, I hereby request a meeting of said Council to
discuss our role in the Foundation and to produce a commentary of JEPs which
we have passed or not passed so that the members of this community will know
our stance on these matter.
I propose that we convene Thursday,
Jabber Servers use the SRV record (I've never heard of the SVC record) to do
just such a thing.
Diz
-Original Message-
From: Mathew Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JDEV] Use of SVC records for server
ghash
is an earlier version of xhash. Use xhash_*.
Diz
-Original Message-From: Utpal Sikdar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:05
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [JDEV] ghash
xhash
Hi all,Anyone please let me know what is the
main difference
What exactly are you trying to do? You certainly can't embed a XPath
expression into the xmlns attribute -- unless you intend for that expression
to be the identifying URL for the namespace...
Diz
-Original Message-
From: Adam Theo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29,
Again, due to the fact that _none_ of the current Jabber source handles namespaces
properly, nothing using namespaces like this will work..
This is a rather large fix to effect -- it requires a lot of code to be
examined to deal with namespaces when processing packets. At this point,
it's
Sorry, just testing a filter. :)
Diz
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
It would be most appropriate to actually write this up as a JEP, don't you
think... :)
Diz
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:53:33AM -0500, temas wrote:
I just got done updating the avatar spec on
http://core.jabber.org/avatar.txt. Please take a look at it and give us
some feedback. Notable
Off a suggestions by pgmillard..
Perhaps this would be a better approach:
presence to='...' ...
x xmlns='jabber:x:browse'
nsstorage:client:avatar/ns
/x
/presence
That's the minimal info required -- clients could simply browse to the
resource for more info.
Hrm..in all the time I've watched the mailing lists (2+ years) that's the
first time I've heard anyone ask for QNX port.. :) I'm sure it can be done..
So do you want a client or a server?
Diz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 02:26:06AM -0700, Chris Chance wrote:
I am currently a user of jabber for
Jabber.org just got a brand new CCM (client connection manager) -- it's likely temas
didn't add the hack in to make flash work properly.. :)
As for jabber.com, nothing has changed there in a long time (that i'm aware) of...
Diz
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:03:25PM +0100, Keith Salisbury wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 03:27:02PM +0200, Riviere St?phane wrote:
Hi,
I noticed the following about S2S communication :
- the jabber.xml file allows to change the LISTENING port of the server
for S2S communication (by default 5269) as for C2S communication
- when initializing the
Well, there's not really a clean way to tie directly into the presence
system at this point. However, if you're up for a bit of code..here's
how it could be done...
1.) Create a module which plugins into JSM and redelivers presence
packets to an external component.
2.) Create a component which
There are certainly _opinions_ on SIP... :)
Diz
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:08:04PM -0500, John Alex Hebert wrote:
Mike,
I'm no fan of M$, let me state for the record. But I kinda thought that M$'s use of
SIP in the XP version of MSN Messenger was a big deal and will lead to the
use of SIP
This is due to some strange race-conditions in the s2s code currently
in the servers.
Diz
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:20:24AM +0100, Al Sutton wrote:
I've had a quick look through the logs and found...
20010602T05:41:57: [notice] (jabber.com): bouncing a packet to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from
Care to post a link?
Diz
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:46:15PM +0100, Michael Hearn wrote:
(sorry for no quotes, this is off the digest)
I think this is an excellent opportunity to advertise my lovely Identity
system that I described some time ago in a paper. This I believe is a much
more
Jabber already uses SRV records for server lookups. :)
Diz
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:06:18AM -0500, Taral wrote:
Why not use DNS SRV records (see RFC 2052) to look up jabber servers.
Right now, my taral.net A record is tied up with a web site, and I can't
change it. But I could quite
Heh, never said it was documented... :)
However, if you use SRV records, the code is there to support it in
server-to-server comms.
As for the documentation, we're workin' on it. :)
Diz
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:22:48PM -0500, Taral wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:01:05PM -0500, [EMAIL
In the next iteration of server development, MIO will be modified such
that it will not will use SIGUSR2 for this. Having debugging turned on
via SIGUSR2 is intriguing and we'll look into that for the next
iteration. Probably, it would simply be used as a boolean -- if
debugging is off SIGUSR2
Huh? What are you wanting to do with such a script?
Diz
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:24:06AM -0700, Max Metral wrote:
This might make it a bit annoying to write automated scripts... Unless we
have some way of finding out what state the server is in?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
temas wrote:
This is one of the exact goals of the Foundation, to have a formalized
process for working on the protocol. Jabelin will then be the group to
work on server development. Some more info about this should be
Greetings..
Well, the silence has been long, I know. Seems like I really only use
this mailing list to apologize for not using the mailing list.. :) I
thought I would just take a few moments and catch everybody up with
where I am at, in terms of development, and where I hope to go.
To begin
Lemme just translate this marketing stuff to engineering speak:
Enables Distributed Processing across multiple server farms which in
turn may support multiple CPUs.
Jabber.com reworked the server to be pre-emptively multi-threaded
(pthreads). Additionally, some work on JSM was done to
42 matches
Mail list logo
