Does anybody sucessfully used HTTP proxy in Jabber client ?
I know 2 methods of using HTTP proxy for jabber client:
1) with method CONNECT - it works fine, but this method is not commonly used
on all proxies and often disabled.
2) with method PUT using jabber server 1.4.1 buildin hack for this.
> I wonder what would happen if you add Content-Length with a very
> big value. Does the proxy wait for the entire transfer before
> switching the direction or allow to download immediatly ?
>
> Have you tried ?
Yes,
It first waits for all data specified by Content-Length, so nothing happens
unt
I've testes HTTP proxy and got same results. I've been wanting to write that
to the list.
Thank you Michal
Zad
> Message: 6
> From: "Michal Leinweber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 01:28:31 +0200
>
From: "Michal Leinweber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Does anybody sucessfully used HTTP proxy in Jabber client ?
> I know 2 methods of using HTTP proxy for jabber client:
>
> 1) with method CONNECT - it works fine, but this method is not commonly
used
> on all proxies and often disabled.
> 2) with metho
Title: RE: [JDEV] HTTP proxy
I think AIM supports HTTP polling now too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ashvil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] HTTP proxy
>
>
> From: &q
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:14:29 +0530, "Ashvil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> The PUT method documented assumes a persistent connection. Most HTTP
Proxies
> does not allow a persistent connection or block any request responses
after
> the first. The method actually works if you can get a persistent
> A agree - that is a horrible way. I think there is a better one
> (not my idea): to have one connection (ex. GET method) for downstream,
> and a second one opened permanently (PUT) or reopened for every
> chunk of data (POST) for upstream. This uses twice much connections,
We thought about some
I'm working on a client, adding support for different proxy types. I
have SOCKS v4 and v5 and HTTPS CONNECT, but I still have users who talk
about HTTP proxy, making references to MSN Messenger. I haven't been
able to find anything relating to a standard way to do firewall
traversal using an H
Hi Justin.
Have you looked at a thread of messages at jdev archive site?
http://mailman.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/2002-July/012593.html
Partilularly, Mr. Matthias Wimmer's message:
http://mailman.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/2002-July/012596.html
I hope this helps.
--
)Hiroaki Nakamura) [EMAIL PRO
Thanks Hiroaki. I've seen discussions about the polling method, and want
to stay away from that due to security. The other method you mention is
to send
PUT http://jabber.org:5222/ HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: test
Host: jabber.org:5222
I'm currently sending
CONNECT servername serverport HTTP/1.0
What
Hi Justin
Justin Georgeson wrote:
> What's the real difference between the two? If the CONNECT fails should
> I assume that the PUT will fail too? It's entirely possible that I
> implemented it wrong.
I'm afraid I cannot answer to your question because I don't understand the
method yet. So, I as
Ashvil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One big request is support for HTTP proxy. Jermie replied to
> my request earlier that this functionality is in CVS.
>
> Can some of the public jabber servers (jabberview.com) support
> this ? This would enable lot of users behind firewalls to join
> the jabber
Has anyone incorporated the HTTP proxy pass through in any Jabber client?
___
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
Jarl has done so.
--temas
On 10 May 2001 14:57:42 -0400, Drash, Jim [EESUS] wrote:
> Has anyone incorporated the HTTP proxy pass through in any Jabber client?
>
>
> ___
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
14 matches
Mail list logo
