Honestly, what convinced me was someone pointing out that it is
called a "JID", short for "Jabber ID". For some reason I neglected to
remember this.
On Mar 1, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
On 3/1/06, [EMAIL P
On Thursday 02 March 2006 06:38, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
> On 3/1/06, Hal Rottenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, but even so the "from" header isn't called "SMTP-ID", it's called
> > "from".
> >
> > +1 for the more human-friendly Jabber-ID
>
> Almost forgot to note that "from" is also not in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Rottenberg wrote:
> On 3/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another +1 to XMPP-ID.
>>
>> 1. The protocol standard is XMPP (and not Jabber) - all our efforts should
>> be behind the "XMPP" bandwagon.
>
> Yes, but even so the "fro
> +1 for the more human-friendly Jabber-ID
count me +1 for Jabber-ID too.
--
- Norman Rasmussen
- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/
On 3/1/06, Hal Rottenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but even so the "from" header isn't called "SMTP-ID", it's called "from".
>
> +1 for the more human-friendly Jabber-ID
Almost forgot to note that "from" is also not in URI format.
--
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 3/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another +1 to XMPP-ID.
>
> 1. The protocol standard is XMPP (and not Jabber) - all our efforts should
> be behind the "XMPP" bandwagon.
Yes, but even so the "from" header isn't called "SMTP-ID", it's called "from".
+1 for the more human-fr
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 1. The protocol standard is XMPP (and not Jabber)
However the term that RFC 3920 uses for an XMPP address is "Jabber
Identifier or JID".
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/
FISHER: CYCLONIC 5 TO 7. SNOW SHOWERS. GOOD OCCASI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another +1 to XMPP-ID.
> 2. There is atleast one commercial vendor with Jabber in their name.
> There are also popular opensource servers with jabber in their name. In
> that sense, jabber-id creates more confusion about pro
Another +1 to XMPP-ID. 1. The protocol standard is XMPP (and not Jabber) - all our efforts should be behind the "XMPP" bandwagon.2. There is atleast one commercial vendor with Jabber in their name. There are also popular opensource servers with jabber in their name. In that sense, jabber-id creates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesus Cea wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Are you saying +1 to his question or +1 to XMPP-ID? :-)
>
> To "XMPP-ID".
>
>>> I see several reasons for Jabber-ID:
>
> Good enough. Point taken.
>
> May I suggest to document these reasons in the pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Are you saying +1 to his question or +1 to XMPP-ID? :-)
To "XMPP-ID".
> I see several reasons for Jabber-ID:
Good enough. Point taken.
May I suggest to document these reasons in the page?. I suppose it could
be a FAQ, som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesus Cea wrote:
> Robert B Quattlebaum, Jr. wrote:
>>> Any particular reason why we are using "Jabber-ID" instead of "XMPP-ID"?
>
> +1
Are you saying +1 to his question or +1 to XMPP-ID? :-)
I see several reasons for Jabber-ID:
1. Jabber-ID is his
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert B Quattlebaum, Jr. wrote:
> Any particular reason why we are using "Jabber-ID" instead of "XMPP-ID"?
+1
- --
Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert B Quattlebaum, Jr. wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> FYI, I've started to define a "Jabber-ID" email header so that people
>> can automatically detect JIDs associated with senders (could be cool for
>> presence i
On Feb 16, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
FYI, I've started to define a "Jabber-ID" email header so that people
can automatically detect JIDs associated with senders (could be
cool for
presence icons in email clients, message verification a la JEP-0070,
etc.).
Any particular rea
On 2/21/06, Norman Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might have a problem getting Outlook to to add that header. MS
> want you to use MSN, not Jabber. You _might_ be able to do it with an
> outlook plugin, but don't count on it.
I looked into this and pretty much decided its too much tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Daniel Schumacher wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2006 19:57 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>
>> How about Eudora, KMail, Notes, Outlook, etc.? (I don't use those, but it
>> would be cool to document Jabber-ID support for those.)
>
Hi Peter,
Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2006 19:57 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
> How about Eudora, KMail, Notes, Outlook, etc.? (I don't use those, but it
> would be cool to document Jabber-ID support for those.)
This[1] is a description how to add custom headers to KMail. I have tested it
and as yo
On 2/21/06, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That wiki page currently describes how to add "Jabber-ID" header support
> to Emacs, Mail.app, Mutt, and Thunderbird. How about Eudora, KMail,
> Notes, Outlook, etc.? (I don't use those, but it would be cool to
> document Jabber-ID support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> That wiki page currently describes how to add "Jabber-ID" header support
> to Emacs, Mail.app, Mutt, and Thunderbird. How about Eudora, KMail,
> Notes, Outlook, etc.?
I think you can add headers in Outlook Express using OE-P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trejkaz wrote:
> On Friday 17 February 2006 07:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> FYI, I've started to define a "Jabber-ID" email header so that people
>> can automatically detect JIDs associated with senders (could be cool for
>> presence icons in email
On Friday 17 February 2006 07:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> FYI, I've started to define a "Jabber-ID" email header so that people
> can automatically detect JIDs associated with senders (could be cool for
> presence icons in email clients, message verification a la JEP-0070,
> etc.). More here:
>
On 2/16/06, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> FYI, I've started to define a "Jabber-ID" email header so that people
> can automatically detect JIDs associated with senders (could be cool for
> presence icons in email clients, message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FYI, I've started to define a "Jabber-ID" email header so that people
can automatically detect JIDs associated with senders (could be cool for
presence icons in email clients, message verification a la JEP-0070,
etc.). More here:
http://www.saint-andr
24 matches
Mail list logo
