Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

On Thu 22 Jun 2017 at 04:29, Michael Neale wrote: > I saw all jobs disappear in a github org folder that blue ocean created > previously, when I triggered a scan. > > (it also doesn't seem to trigger scans if I add change the pattern, or run > the wizard again). > I need

Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

I saw all jobs disappear in a github org folder that blue ocean created previously, when I triggered a scan. (it also doesn't seem to trigger scans if I add change the pattern, or run the wizard again). On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 4:39:30 AM UTC+10, Mark Waite wrote: > > I haven't tried it

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

I think it is fine to expect some infrequent scanning - it probably needs to be the default though as otherwise people wire up a webhook - and end up never deleting branches. On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 6:49:02 PM UTC+10, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > On 21 June 2017 at 01:16, Michael Neale

Jenkis CLI client connection problem over CLI-Port

Is there a way to pinpoint the thread which holds CLOSE_WAIT connection? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

If you cannot get an ideal "before" that's ok... I'm just trying to make it easier to know if you have and problematic rebuilds... if you can't get it clean, best is better than none at all On Wed 21 Jun 2017 at 20:34, Michael Kobit wrote: > Will be able to run this through

Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

Will be able to run this through tomorrow or Friday. The before state is harder to get because of how we manage onboarding consumers. On Wed, Jun 21, 2017, 13:39 Mark Waite wrote: > I haven't tried it yet. I'm configuring the "before" state today and will > capture

Re: Publish over FTP on Jenkins Pipeline?

I know for sure that the Publish Over family of plugins don't support pipeline, they need to have some work done to support it. On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:26 AM Thiago Carvalho Davila < thiago.dav...@serpro.gov.br> wrote: > Hello, > > I've been using this Publish Over FTP plugin for some time (

Re: Workspace cleanup failing after updating Jenkins 2.65

I have another job that uses the same option and is working just fine. The one that is failing is a Java application using Maven to build. On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 1:57:36 PM UTC-4, t3knoid wrote: > > I recently updated to Jenkins 2.65 and some of my plugins. Now every time > I try to

How to make sure that any PMD or Findbug warning fails the CI build?

The expectation is that whenever PMD or FindBug analysis report any warning, the CI build should fail. How can I enable that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

multibranch project: repository scan and pipeline libraries

I have a github based multibranch project that uses pipeline libraries. Triggering the scan of a repository (either manually or through a schedule) rebuilds all open branches and pull requests if there has been a change made to the pipeline code even if no change has happened on the main

Re: Workspace cleanup failing after updating Jenkins 2.65

It's definitely java.exe. I see a hold on that folder using a utility called handle.exe from Sysinternals. I am troubleshooting now. I am getting around the problem by not using "Delete workspace before build starts" option and setting

Re: Workspace cleanup failing after updating Jenkins 2.65

Interesting that it only happens every other job. You might consider https://superuser.com/questions/117902/find-out-which-process-is-locking-a-file-or-folder-in-windows as a starting point to confirm that the process locking the file (or directory) is java.exe that is running Jenkins. If it is

Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

I haven't tried it yet. I'm configuring the "before" state today and will capture its state, then will deploy the new code tomorrow morning and capture the after state. I won't do anything to compare those until tomorrow evening or this weekend. Mark Waite On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:30 PM

Re: GitHub and Bitbucket branch source UI refactoring

How many people have been able to try this so far? On Tue 20 Jun 2017 at 14:52, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are chomping at the bit, here are all the binaries: > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/47weboatdzus22w/AADNF_aBniOyEeQi9MvM82sMa?dl=0 > > SHA1

Publish over FTP on Jenkins Pipeline?

Hello, I've been using this Publish Over FTP plugin for some time (https://github.com/jenkinsci/publish-over-ftp-plugin​). And I want to know if there is compatibility to doing that using jenkins pipeline for a declarative pipeline or does it has some other plugin with that feature. Thanks in

Workspace cleanup failing after updating Jenkins 2.65

I recently updated to Jenkins 2.65 and some of my plugins. Now every time I try to build a job that has been working all along, the job fails when trying to clean the workspace. It only happens after every other job. I can get around the issue by restarting the slave service (Windows). This is

Re: Runing Groovy scripts on Jenkins on Master

if you are into a pipeline, you can swap node by using node("master") { ... } -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: REST API to create Credentials in jenkins

Hello Venkata, Could you please help me for create job create user create group etc.. all the above stuff by using java code. Thanks, Dayanand On Saturday, 1 August 2015 03:13:50 UTC+5:30, Venkata Naga Rakesh wrote: > > Hello, > > I have created jenkins job through API and now trying to figure

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Runing Groovy scripts on Jenkins on Master

Am 21.06.2017 um 13:59 schrieb Oparlescu Vlad: > It seems that due to the fact that I use system groovy script build > option, the build still runs on a slave ? > Is there a mistake or a setting that must be made on the master ? The *job* may run on a slave, but the *script* (since it's a system

Runing Groovy scripts on Jenkins on Master

Hello Jenkins users, I created a groovy script where I generate some values that I'm reading from the builds. It seems that due to the fact that I use system groovy script build option, the build still runs on a slave ? Is there a mistake or a setting that must be made on the master ?

Re: Configure Compiler Warining Priority

This is not possible yet. You can create a PR that changes the parser if your mapping makes sense for every one. > Am 20.06.2017 um 10:13 schrieb Angel Yanev : > > Hello everybody, > > I am wondering what is the way to configure which warning are with priority >

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

On 21 June 2017 at 01:16, Michael Neale wrote: > Mark do you have a scan interval set? > > Should the github events include removing of branch projects? as that > doesn't seem to be happening lately (since a few months). > So the multibranch API does not allow us to know

Jenkis CLI client connection problem over CLI-Port

Hello, I'm using Jenkins 1.642.1 and since 2 weeks I'm seeing recurring problems with Jenkins CLI client. Precisely the problem is with CLI client not able to correctly establish connection with Jenkins master and get an response. It looks like the connection hangs. Checking connections with

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

Mark do you have a scan interval set? Should the github events include removing of branch projects? as that doesn't seem to be happening lately (since a few months). On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 6:13:32 PM UTC+10, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > > > On 21 June 2017 at 00:19, Michael Neale

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

On 21 June 2017 at 01:04, Michael Neale wrote: > reading the docs for folders, perhaps there is a bug from a bad > assumption. a github event will not trigger a scan like the author of the > folders plugin implies so it still needs to have this set even for > github >

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

On 21 June 2017 at 00:19, Michael Neale wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 4:19:58 PM UTC+10, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> Periodic triggers >>> >>> you want "periodically unless otherwise run" to be something like once a >>> day/week depending on how

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

reading the docs for folders, perhaps there is a bug from a bad assumption. a github event will not trigger a scan like the author of the folders plugin implies so it still needs to have this set even for github On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 6:03:03 PM UTC+10, Michael Neale wrote: > > OK

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

OK on looking further - MBPs created by classic don't have this set - which seems wrong - worthy of a ticket? Ones created by blue ocean do have it set (1 day, as it turns out) via the github org folder. So this explains it, but leaves the issue of the default for creation being wrong. to

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 4:19:58 PM UTC+10, Stephen Connolly wrote: > > > >> >> Periodic triggers >> >> you want "periodically unless otherwise run" to be something like once a >> day/week depending on how long you can handle a missed event (which should >> be unlikely) >> >> I recommend

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

On Wed 21 Jun 2017 at 06:54, Michael Neale wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 3:50:06 PM UTC+10, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> >> >> How often is a full scan? >> > > Is that is from the scan log link - then not for 2 months or so. What > triggers that? All the

Re: 4 month old deleted branches still not removed

On Wed 21 Jun 2017 at 07:18, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed 21 Jun 2017 at 06:54, Michael Neale wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 3:50:06 PM UTC+10, Stephen Connolly wrote: >>> >>> >>> How often is a full scan? >>> >> >>