Hi Roger,
Thanks a lot, I'll look at rewriting my code based on your Perl bridge.
Regards,
Serge Huber.
Roger Ruttimann wrote:
I realized that the changes were not in CVS.
I just submitted them for the Perl portals-bridges.
PHP still uses ScriptPostProcess while Perl uses the rewriter component.
R
David Sean Taylor wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I want to propose the following:
- I like to call a vote on merging the J2 deployment_refactoring
branch with
CVS HEAD before the end of *this week*
I don't see the need to impose a deadline on yourself.
Personally I have enough deadlines as is.
Why d
Ate Douma wrote:
I want to propose the following:
- I like to call a vote on merging the J2 deployment_refactoring branch
with
CVS HEAD before the end of *this week*
No objection here as long as everybody is aware that this will break
Fusion for a few days.
>
- Hopefully, beginning next week
Raphaël Luta wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I want to propose the following:
- I like to call a vote on merging the J2 deployment_refactoring
branch with
CVS HEAD before the end of *this week*
No objection here as long as everybody is aware that this will break
Fusion for a few days.
I guess that'l
Yes...
WE are using Torque.properties file, even because we decided to put
Jetspeed database in a MS SQL Server environment.. See the parameters we
set up for that ...
### Microsoft SQL
torque.database.default.adapter=mssql
torque.dsfactory.default.connection.driver=com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserv
> -Original Message-
> From: Ate Douma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 4:31 PM
> To: Jetspeed Users List; Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: J2/Fusion synchronisation and release plan (Was: Re: Struts-
> Bridge & Fusion - David/Ate/others- Pls comment)
...
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:55 PM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: Re: J2/Fusion synchronisation and release plan (Was: Re: Struts-
> Bridge & Fusion - David/Ate/others- Pls comment)
>
> Ate Douma wro
Scott T Weaver wrote:
I think we should look at consolidating as much info as possible in spot.
Right now people have to search all over the place (wiki, website, READMEs,
etc) to piece together any useful info. Even worse some of our docs are
severely outdated and cause more harm than good :(
I l
Great! Would it be possible for me to get copy of the Jetspeed 2 Forrest
source to "play" with ;)
-scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Raphaël Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 9:57 AM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: Re: J2/Fusion synchronisation and
Of course, give me a few days to put everything in shape though.
Scott T Weaver wrote:
Great! Would it be possible for me to get copy of the Jetspeed 2 Forrest
source to "play" with ;)
-scott
-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 9:5
Thanks!
-scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Raphaël Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:16 AM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: Re: J2/Fusion synchronisation and release plan (Was: Re: Struts-
> Bridge & Fusion - David/Ate/others- Pls comment)
>
> Of
Scott T Weaver wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:55 PM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: Re: J2/Fusion synchronisation and release plan (Was: Re: Struts-
Bridge & Fusion - David/Ate/others- Pls comment)
Ate Doum
Scott T Weaver wrote:
- I like to call a vote on merging the J2 deployment_refactoring branch
+1 on getting it into HEAD ASAP. I'm very excited to see the new code!
Its been waiting in the deployment_refactoring branch for you all along to
look at it ;-)
I am going to take another shot at the bin
Ate Douma wrote:
- Furthermore, I'd like to propose to do releases more often (say
once every
month, maybe two) at least until we reach J2-final.
The next release (M3) could contain the portlet selector (customizer)
from David if he won't be able to commit it in time for M2.
Furthermore,
I was speaking more to the actual installer program I put together. I don't
think we need to cover all the versions of Tomcat when it comes to the
installer program. However, I do agree that we should have binary releases,
i.e. zip/tar files, which contain the versions of J2+Tomcat you mention
be
Ate Douma wrote:
I want to propose the following:
- I like to call a vote on merging the J2 deployment_refactoring branch
with
CVS HEAD before the end of *this week*
As I have positive responses (and non negative) from at least 3 team members
and several from the community too, I'll try to do t
Hi,
I'm trying to set the content of a portlet by writing to the portlet's
outputstream.
I get an error about the outputstream already being committed, which to me
means the outputsteam content was already set further up in the chain. At what
point do I have access to the portlet's outputstre
Irineu Avanço Jr. wrote:
Yes...
WE are using Torque.properties file, even because we decided to put
Jetspeed database in a MS SQL Server environment.. See the parameters we
set up for that ...
Sounds like a problem with Torque and SQL Server
Try asking on the Torque list, as Jetspeed doesnt hand
Hello for all.
Anybody knows if jetspeed support certification as x509 ? Anybody already made
it ?
Any help is very welcome.
Thanks.
Carlos Torres
taylor 2005/03/22 16:04:39
Modified:applications/gems/src/java/org/apache/portals/gems/browser
BrowserPortlet.java DatabaseBrowserPortlet.java
Log:
don't require Jetspeed to run Database browser portlets
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -1
Roger,
I'm -1 with bringing in Jetspeed dependencies (jetspeed-rewriter) in bridges.
That's against the policy we agreed upon.
But, as the rewriter itself isn't dependent on Jetspeed, I guess you could move
it into the bridges (bridges-rewriter?).
The perl bridge currently doesn't build anymore b
ate 2005/03/22 16:58:45
Modified:portals-bridges/perl project.xml
Log:
Added *temporary* dependency on jetspeed-rewriter until its moved into
bridges itself
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +7 -1 jakarta-jetspeed-2/portals-bridges/perl/project.xml
Index: proj
The rewriter is a component that gets build with Jetspeed but it doesn't
have any dependencies on the Jetspeed framework (API).
When I proposed the change a while ago everybody agreed. In strict terms
a lot of components in jetspeed (persistence-plugin,..) are not bound to
jetspeed but they are
rogerrut2005/03/22 17:08:30
Modified:portals-bridges/perl project.xml
Log:
The updated project file didn't make it into CVS. Here it is
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +10 -1 jakarta-jetspeed-2/portals-bridges/perl/project.xml
Index: project.xml
ate 2005/03/22 17:19:59
Modified:portals-bridges/perl project.xml
Log:
Removed my addition of the jetspeed-rewriter dependency again. Only one
should be enough :-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -7 jakarta-jetspeed-2/portals-bridges/perl/project.xml
Inde
Just a short status update:
I've merged the branch locally and all seems to work as expected on Tomcat
5.0.28
I'll continue testing tomorrow morning for Tomcat 5.5.8 and JBoss 3.2.7.
If that goes well too, I'll commit the changes.
Now heading for bed :-)
Regards, Ate
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
