RE: AW: OJB

2002-11-26 Thread David Sean Taylor
> turbine will have support for torque AND ojb in future versions. > i'm planning to seperate the generation part from torque and extend it > to support both systems. > i'll also try to generate torque-style om/peer classes using ojb to make > it easy to switch from torque to ojb .. but torque will

Re: AW: OJB

2002-11-26 Thread Martin Poeschl
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote: Hi David, Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed? I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't finish though, ran out of time. How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist d

AW: OJB

2002-11-26 Thread Jürgen Hoffmann
Hi David, >> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed? > I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't finish though, ran out of time. How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist development or start over? >> Does any