I don't mind at all :)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:00:00 -0800, David Sean Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Youssef Mohammed wrote:
I think it has nothing to do with the portlets since the only changes
he (Dan) made was the number of users.
I suggest to do some profiling (both IBM and Oracle
Well folks, we found the issue with the 100,000 users problem.
I used p6spy to grab all the SQL statements going to the database, and
we saw this:
1099788107943|13|1|statement||SELECT TURBINE_USER.USER_ID,
TURBINE_USER.LOGIN_NA
ME, TURBINE_USER.PASSWORD_VALUE, TURBINE_USER.FIRST_NAME,
Glad that u solved your problem. I also wonder if anyone has
explanation of what happened to Dan and other solution without turning
the SecuirtyAccessControl off.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:58:46 -0800 (PST), Dan Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well folks, we found the issue with the 100,000 users
I can verify that I saw this behavior on PostgreSQL back on 1.4, so I
suspect it's not DB dependant. I use a custom authentication class and do
my own caching, so never really pursued it. (And, in fact, forgot about it
until this message jogged my memory.)
-- Michael
On 11/17/04 8:58 AM, Dan
Youssef Mohammed wrote:
I think it has nothing to do with the portlets since the only changes
he (Dan) made was the number of users.
I suggest to do some profiling (both IBM and Oracle stuff can help )
to the jetspped instance to see what is going on.
I used to work on J1 last year and I did found
David Sean Taylor wrote:
Youssef Mohammed wrote:
I think it has nothing to do with the portlets since the only changes
he (Dan) made was the number of users.
I suggest to do some profiling (both IBM and Oracle stuff can help )
to the jetspped instance to see what is going on.
I used to work on J1
it.
http://hsqldb.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/ch04.html
-Original Message-
From: Dan Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: performance slowdown for 100,000 users, all with same PSML
Hi folks,
I have an application I'm
Hi folks,
I have an application I'm building on top of Jetspeed 1.5--I just
grabbed the WAR from portals.apache.org. The back end is an Oracle
database.
I end up having around 100,000 users in the turbine_user table. All of
these users have the same PSML and they all have the same role; we're
Hi Dan,
Try having zero portlets on the default page, and see if it makes a
difference...
Then start adding your portlets in and see where the bottleneck starts.
Dan Moore wrote:
Hi folks,
I have an application I'm building on top of Jetspeed 1.5--I just
grabbed the WAR from
I think it has nothing to do with the portlets since the only changes
he (Dan) made was the number of users.
I suggest to do some profiling (both IBM and Oracle stuff can help )
to the jetspped instance to see what is going on.
I used to work on J1 last year and I did found some scalability issues
10 matches
Mail list logo