> On Oct 27, 2016, at 5:22 PM, Steve Drach wrote:
>
> I’ve put out another webrev,
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdrach/8156499/webrev.05/, that addresses Mandy’s
> concerns. In particular I demonstrate that the resultant image is “runnable”
> and that a Main class
Changeset: 74b4b6a2ae2b
Author:jjg
Date: 2016-10-31 16:50 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/74b4b6a2ae2b
fix test for provides table
! test/tools/javac/classfiles/attributes/Module/ModuleTest.java
!
Changeset: 08e003561fba
Author:jjg
Date: 2016-10-31 16:00 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/08e003561fba
initial support for new provides syntax and provides table in Module attribute
!
Changeset: 9fcb953ee79d
Author:jjg
Date: 2016-10-31 15:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/9fcb953ee79d
basic support for new provides table in Module attribute
! src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/module/ModuleInfo.java
!
Changeset: 2fb22956b1d1
Author:jjg
Date: 2016-10-31 15:22 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/2fb22956b1d1
update javac tests
+
test/tools/javac/diags/examples/HasBeenDeprecatedRemovalModule/HasBeenDeprecatedRemovalModule.java
+
Alan,
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2016 19:33, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
>>
>>> :
>>> Like this:
>>>
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 6:51 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> if (VM.isModuleSystemInited() && !HashedModules.contains(m)) {
> Looks okay, an alternative would be to move that that check to L439.
What do you think about this?
Changeset: 0a91e3198c97
Author:jlahoda
Date: 2016-10-18 16:00 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/0a91e3198c97
8167461: jshell tool: Scanner#next() hangs tool
Summary: PipeInputStream.read(byte[]...) should only read available bytes;
properly resending
Changeset: 0d5081c856bc
Author:sundar
Date: 2016-10-19 13:27 +0530
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/nashorn/rev/0d5081c856bc
8071588: The spec for javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory.getProgram() should
specify NPEs thrown
Reviewed-by: alanb, hannesw
!
Changeset: 1c988e708a06
Author:lana
Date: 2016-10-27 16:29 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxws/rev/1c988e708a06
Added tag jdk-9+142 for changeset 59101416d901
! .hgtags
Changeset: 6e956bc711cb
Author:mchung
Date: 2016-10-31 13:03 -0700
URL:
Changeset: bdafa0cc34a9
Author:aefimov
Date: 2016-10-21 02:53 +0300
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxp/rev/bdafa0cc34a9
8167179: Make XSL generated namespace prefixes local to transformation process
Reviewed-by: joehw
!
Changeset: 4567b6a9e7e9
Author:jiangli
Date: 2016-05-12 17:37 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/hotspot/rev/4567b6a9e7e9
8156794: Extend data sharing
Reviewed-by: iklam, hseigel, acorn, mschoene
! src/share/vm/runtime/arguments.cpp
Changeset: 601485e5640a
Author:
Changeset: fbead0d3c815
Author:mchung
Date: 2016-10-18 13:26 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/rev/fbead0d3c815
8167558: Add new JMOD section for header files and man pages
Reviewed-by: alanb
! make/CreateJmods.gmk
! make/Images.gmk
Changeset: 1c9b94ce045e
Author:
Changeset: 408c9c621938
Author:rriggs
Date: 2016-10-24 14:53 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/corba/rev/408c9c621938
8164908: ReflectionFactory support for IIOP and custom serialization
Summary: Update IIOP Streams to use ReflectionFactory and Unsafe
Reviewed-by:
On 31/10/2016 17:44, Stephen Felts wrote:
That means in the next build as of tomorrow the class format is changed and
classes need to be re-generated?
Yes, any module-info.java from previous builds will need to be
re-compiled. There is also an update to the Module attribute to rev the
On 10/26/2016 10:43 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 10/26/2016 10:39 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 26/10/2016 16:28, David M. Lloyd wrote:
:
Some background is in order I guess. I've been reworking a couple of
our projects to support both Java 9 and Java 8, using MR JARs and also
without MR JARs.
2016/10/30 10:41:36 -0700, Robert Scholte :
> The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
> Maven Compiler Plugin, version 3.6.0
>
> The Compiler Plugin is used to compile the sources of your project.
>
> This version introduces support of
On 31/10/2016 17:06, Paul Bakker wrote:
The proposal looks very good! Thanks for listening to the voiced concerns.
When can we expect a new prototype containing the proposed features?
We have an initial implementation in the jake forest and expect to have
new builds + javadoc on the java.net
On 31/10/16 17:06, Paul Bakker wrote:
> The proposal looks very good! Thanks for listening to the voiced concerns.
> When can we expect a new prototype containing the proposed features?
Alan just pushed an 'initial implementation of open modules' into the
jake forest.
Alan Bateman wrote:
On 29/10/2016 23:09, Simon Nash wrote:
My application uses sun.misc.SignalHandler which is now in the
jdk.unsupported
module. This class is available when running with the full JRE but
not when
running with the compact3 JRE.
The sun.misc.* classes are available in the
The proposal looks very good! Thanks for listening to the voiced concerns.
When can we expect a new prototype containing the proposed features?
Thanks,
Paul
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:38 PM John Rose wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 9:07 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Changeset: 5401bbd15280
Author:alanb
Date: 2016-10-31 15:59 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/nashorn/rev/5401bbd15280
Initial implementation of open modules
!
src/jdk.scripting.nashorn/share/classes/jdk/nashorn/internal/scripts/ModuleGraphManipulator.java
Changeset: e4e3f6e64a91
Author:alanb
Date: 2016-10-31 15:47 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jaxws/rev/e4e3f6e64a91
Initial implementation of open modules
! src/java.xml.bind/share/classes/module-info.java
! src/java.xml.ws/share/classes/module-info.java
!
Changeset: ce2af21982c1
Author:jlahoda
Date: 2016-10-31 15:47 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/ce2af21982c1
Initial implementation of open modules
! src/java.compiler/share/classes/javax/lang/model/element/ModuleElement.java
!
Changeset: eb57bd291112
Author:alanb
Date: 2016-10-31 15:46 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/jdk/rev/eb57bd291112
Initial implementation of open modules
! make/launcher/Launcher-jdk.jconsole.gmk
!
+1
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan
> wrote:
>
> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8160063/webrev.02/ for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160063
>
> PS. Earlier review thread on slightly different
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 2:09 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> :
>
> Given the BootClassLoader instance is not in fact the boot loader at all I
> think it would have been clearer and avoid potential confusion to call this
> something more representative of its purpose -
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8160063/webrev.02/ for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160063
PS. Earlier review thread on slightly different fix:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-September/009392.html
Thanks,
-Sundar
On 28/10/2016 04:01, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:01 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
One thing to check is getHashedModuleNames where it assumes the boot Layer
exists, I assume this has the potential to NPE if we have any cases where a
stack trace is printed
On 10/28/2016 4:44 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Oct 28, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Brent Christian
wrote:
Should something be done for STEs returned from
StackFrameInfo.toStackTraceElement() ?
Good catch - I missed it. I added package-private static methods in
30 matches
Mail list logo