e good. I would name it either "service" or "provide".
--
Best regards, Alex Orlov
Вторник, 24 ноября 2020, 10:26 +03:00 от David Holmes
:
On 24/11/2020 4:46 pm, Alex Orlov wrote:
> Could you then explain the difference between service and service
> prov
serviceProvider() or
serviceImplementor() - but providor() suffices.
Cheers,
David
-
--
Best regards, Alex Orlov
Вторник, 24 ноября 2020, 7:47 +03:00 от David Holmes
:
On 23/11/2020 6:28 pm, Alex Orlov wrote:
> > The method does return a "provider". It r
service.
And that object is the service provider.
David
-
--
Best regards, Alex Orlov
Понедельник, 23 ноября 2020, 1:30 +03:00 от David Holmes
:
On 20/11/2020 9:48 pm, Alex Orlov wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> According to this tutorial
https://
On 20/11/2020 9:48 pm, Alex Orlov wrote:
Hello all,
According to this tutorial https://www.logicbig.com/tutorials/core-java-tutorial/modules/service-provider-method.html
we can declare in module-info provider class with "provider" method. For
example,
..
public class TheServicePr
On 13/04/2018 5:12 PM, Doug Simon wrote:
On 13 Apr 2018, at 07:15, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Doug,
Not a review. :) Just wondering what HotSpotRuntimeMBean has to do with this ???
These are the non-Graal code base changes needed to move the bean out of the
jdk.internal.vm.compiler module
Hi Doug,
Not a review. :) Just wondering what HotSpotRuntimeMBean has to do with
this ???
Thanks,
David
On 13/04/2018 4:24 AM, Doug Simon wrote:
Please review this change that removes the existing Graal service provider for
hooking into the Platform MBean Server and makes
jdk.internal.vm.c
ource? If so, why not
expose it making it easier for others so those interested don't have to
reinvent the wheel every time.
Is there official documentation explaining the method resolution process
somewhere?
On Monday, January 15, 2018, 4:02:44 PM CST, David Holmes
wrote:
On 16
On 16/01/2018 4:27 AM, jeffrey kutcher wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts Jochen. I have a section of code that does just that; function search and casting return values. Not easy ... nor as easy as it should be.
You would think however, that if a function call would cause no issues, say
vbox.ge
Hi Nicolai,
On 9/01/2018 6:30 AM, Nicolai Parlog wrote:
Hi,
every source I found indicates that jlink makes it possible to create a
runtime image with a client, server, or minimal VM. However I can't make
it work for client and minimal:
Error: Selected VM client doesn't exist.
I tri
On 27/12/2017 5:43 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 26.12.2017 19:30, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
hi all,
Do all files in META-INF/services now have to be well formed according
to the SPI strucutres in Java, or is it still valid to have other
files in there as well? Before the module system it was
Hi Peter,
Moving this over to jigsaw-dev.
David
On 29/08/2017 3:45 PM, Peter Major wrote:
Hi,
I'm not quite sure if this is the right mailing list to ask, but I'm
wondering whether there is a bug in wscompile in the build 9+181 version.
In a project of mine, I have a java ant task calling
c
Correction ...
On 25/05/2017 5:00 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Mandy
On 25/05/2017 8:10 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8181033/webrev.00/
This fixes the launcher to print the exception being thrown rather than
the confusing message "Error: A JNI
Hi Mandy
On 25/05/2017 8:10 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8181033/webrev.00/
This fixes the launcher to print the exception being thrown rather than
the confusing message "Error: A JNI error has occurred, please check
your installation and try again”. A
On 23/05/2017 10:45 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:51 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 23/05/2017 6:20 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Volker - one suggestion for your experiments is to change your JDK 8
security properties file (java.security) to add "com.sun.crypto.provider
On 23/05/2017 6:20 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Volker - one suggestion for your experiments is to change your JDK 8
security properties file (java.security) to add
"com.sun.crypto.provider." to the value of the "package.access"
property. That should mean you will get the same AccessControlException
On 22/03/2017 8:09 AM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Alan,
The hotspot part looks good.
I second that - but a few copyright years need updating.
It was unfortunate that yet another version of
vm_exit_during_initialization had to be added.
Thanks,
David
Thanks,
Serguei
On 3/21/17 14
Hi Claes,
On 15/02/2017 11:22 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
a few intermittent but rare test failures[1] that has appeared
since the latest jake integration, and since one of the changes
in there was to make initialization of the system ImageReader
lazy there appears to be cases where ImageRead
On 15/02/2017 8:03 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Chris, Max,
thanks for your quick answers. So the service approach seems to fit quite well.
But can I assume that my service implementation will be available already at
"bootstrap time" of the JDK? E.g. if I need to register/reach my service
On 2/02/2017 8:59 PM, Nicolai Parlog wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Alan.
The trace messages emitted by -Xdiag:resolver are printed as the
resolver runs.
I'm sorry for being such a noob but my Google Foo failed at telling me
how to turn trace on for -Xdiag. :( Can
On 2/02/2017 7:49 AM, Nicolai Parlog wrote:
Hi Alan,
`-Xdiag:resolver` is awesome! :) I think these messages are great
candidates for info-level messages with the "modules" tag via unified
logging.
You are dealing with two completely separate pieces of the platform.
-Xdiag is a launcher opti
Typo: ResourceAllocationProblem.class -> ResourceLocationProblem.class
David
On 17/01/2017 11:15 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Rick,
On 17/01/2017 10:55 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Resending since the moderator rejected my initial post for want of a
subscription to jigsaw-dev.
Origi
Hi Rick,
On 17/01/2017 10:55 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Resending since the moderator rejected my initial post for want of a
subscription to jigsaw-dev.
Original Message
Subject: resource location problem in JDK 9 from build 148 onward
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:45:23 -
Hi Mandy,
On 17/01/2017 7:51 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
java.compact$N modules were removed in jdk-9+150 [1][2].
We revisited the need for java.compact$N aggregator. Compact Profiles
were useful in SE 8 but are legacy in 9, as intended from the outset.
Highlighting them in the standard SE 9 modul
Hi Mandy,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8168836/webrev.00/
This patch improves the warning/error message to include the option name, emit
a warning if unknown module is specified with —-patch-module be consistent with
the options.
Mandy
As a result of this change we now
Hi Andrew,
I'm redirecting this to jigsaw-dev as it seems to be a modularity
related problem.
Additional comment below ...
David
On 16/12/2016 7:48 AM, Andrew Guibert wrote:
Hello all,
I've been doing some experimentation with WebSphere Liberty on Java 9 and
ran into a problem that I bel
On 14/12/2016 8:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/12/2016 09:56, David Holmes wrote:
Sorry I don't follow. Calling setAccessible(true), logically does
nothing except set a flag that controls whether reflective use of the
member will need to pass an access check -it doesn't (or
Hi Peter,
On 14/12/2016 5:30 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi David,
On 12/14/2016 07:17 AM, David Holmes wrote:
But let me explain why .setAccessible(true) can't be allowed for
protected members in general.
I'm confused as to what is being argued for/against here.
Rony asked why .set
On 14/12/2016 8:17 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Jochen,
On 12/13/2016 06:32 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 12.12.2016 20:56, Alex Buckley wrote:
[...]
The ability of protected members to be accessed from outside their
package means they are essentially public members for the purposes of
inher
Does addExports only affect reflective access to the module, or does it
change all access? I'm trying to determine what the set of actions X
will be such that:
try {
;
}
catch () {
execute( () -> mod.addExports(...)); // address the problem
; // now it succeeds
}
Thanks,
David
On 29/10/2016 3:32 AM, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote:
I used jlink to create minimal custom JRE image on OSX and Linux and I noticed
there is a significant difference in size. The Mac version takes 21M where the
Linux one takes 30M which means Linux version is 50% bigger than Mac.
Is it as you would
Hi Mandy,
I know it's rather late in the game to notice this but I only just
noticed this due to Serguei's comment ...
On 28/10/2016 5:06 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I have a few comments.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/6479237/webrev.00/jdk/src/java.ba
On 21/10/2016 12:41 PM, Diaz Soho wrote:
hi,
I have finish build jdk8u for mips embedded platform with zero VM. But
the size of rt.jar is very big, it can not put into my embedded
platform rootfs. I would like to find small set for embedded platform.
I am not sure :
is jigsaw suitable for mips e
On 2/08/2016 1:58 AM, Stephane Epardaud wrote:
I don't think public ever meant "public to the world". In Java 1->8 it
means "visible to those who can see the containing scope". If you
declare a public inner class in a private (or package-private) class,
then those who cannot access the outer type
esired, and that the set of packages a module exports is still known
and limited (just automated by the compiler). Option (4) also
mitigates the issue that David Holmes has repeatedly indicated, where
jigsaw is currently planning on changing the meaning of "public".
I think you meant Da
On 3/07/2016 8:09 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jul 2, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
What about extending the behavior of -version option so that when it is
specified together with other startup options like -mp, -m, -cp, MainClass, ...
it would behave just like --dry-run has been desig
On 2/07/2016 1:17 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jul 1, 2016, at 12:48 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Okay so back to my original statement - if all this does is ensure the main
class is found does it really carry its weight as a new argument?
Are you suggesting for java —-dry-run to run or not to
On 1/07/2016 4:11 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 30, 2016, at 10:15 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 1/07/2016 3:00 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 30, 2016, at 9:44 PM, David Holmes wrote:
I had assumed that initialization was desirable as part of checking that
everything was specified
On 1/07/2016 3:00 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 30, 2016, at 9:44 PM, David Holmes wrote:
I had assumed that initialization was desirable as part of checking that
everything was specified correctly. If not then --dry-run would seem to do very
little compared to just running -version, and
On 30/06/2016 5:37 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Mandy,
The following patch:
--- old/src/java.base/share/native/libjli/java.c2016-06-30
09:32:59.519839770 +0200
+++ new/src/java.base/share/native/libjli/java.c2016-06-30
09:32:59.458839421 +0200
@@ -476,15 +476,6 @@
*/
PostJVMI
Hi Mandy,
On 9/06/2016 10:45 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Adding jigsaw-dev where the code review is posted. See [1] for Coleen’s review
comment.
On Jun 8, 2016, at 4:53 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 9/06/2016 8:37 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
I have to ask why Hotspot convention was violated
Hi Mandy,
On 4/06/2016 4:47 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8136930/webrev.00/
-modulepath, -addmods, -limitmods, -XaddExports, -XaddReads, -Xpatch are java
launcher options in the current implementation. Custom launchers will have to
use -D t
, at 11:16, David Holmes wrote:
On 13/07/2015 6:06 PM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thank you,
I am removing the null check and throw.
Why are you removing them ??
David
JF
On 13 Jul 2015, at 08:06, David Holmes wrote:
On 11/07/2015 2:45 AM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thanks Alan,
I had
On 13/07/2015 6:06 PM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thank you,
I am removing the null check and throw.
Why are you removing them ??
David
JF
On 13 Jul 2015, at 08:06, David Holmes wrote:
On 11/07/2015 2:45 AM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thanks Alan,
I had read the spec from
https
On 11/07/2015 2:45 AM, Jean-Francois Denise wrote:
Thanks Alan,
I had read the spec from
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/functions.html#array_operations
And it was not clear.
FYI the spec has just been updated to clarify that the
NewArray functions can throw OO
Never mind. I thought this was something jigsaw specific but it isn't.
Sorry for the noise.
David
On 7/10/2014 7:56 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Can someone tell me what the jdk-server-image is please?
Thanks,
David
Can someone tell me what the jdk-server-image is please?
Thanks,
David
Hi John,
On 5/09/2014 7:13 AM, John Rose wrote:
We have standard OpenJDK source locations for platform-specific code, as
described in http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/201 .
For example:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/tip/src/java.base/linux/classes/sun/nio/ch/LinuxAsynchronousChanne
On 16/08/2014 1:58 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Omair,
No, as I tried to explain in my initial mail on this thread, since the
modules are all compiled in parallel, and not sequentially like the
current build does with the repositories, it doesn't make much sense
timing each module. The numbers
48 matches
Mail list logo
