Re: [Jmol-users] R: Re: two JSmols in the page

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
local tests will only work with some versions of Firefox. On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:37 AM, pino.stricc...@libero.it pino.stricc...@libero.it wrote: Yes here too. Test3.htm works fine from fine, but locally it doesnt work. I supposed i have old files. Is it calling a php script ? Pino

Re: [Jmol-users] R: Re: two JSmols in the page

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
(and not with Chrome or MSIE) On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Robert Hanson hans...@stolaf.edu wrote: local tests will only work with some versions of Firefox. On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:37 AM, pino.stricc...@libero.it pino.stricc...@libero.it wrote: Yes here too. Test3.htm works fine

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol - three months in

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/test2.htm and http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip have been updated. Please let me know if with Firefox you are seeing the alert Firefox bug -- continuing at test2.htm Bob -- Robert M. Hanson Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry Chair,

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol - three months in

2012-11-24 Thread Sérgio Ceroni da Silva
Em 24/11/2012 16:32, Robert Hanson escreveu: Please let me know if with Firefox you are seeing the alert Firefox bug -- continuing at test2.htm Yes (FF 17.0, Win7/64) -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud

Re: [Jmol-users] R: Re: two JSmols in the page

2012-11-24 Thread Herráez Sánchez Ángel
Hello Pino I had fresh files for my testing which failed. And no, test3.htm calls no php -Mensaje original- De: pino.stricc...@libero.it [mailto:pino.stricc...@libero.it] Yes here too. Test3.htm works fine from fine, but locally it doesnt work. I supposed i have old files. Is it

[Jmol-users] mnimization

2012-11-24 Thread Dan Damelin
On Nov 22, 2012, at - November 22 - 6:34 AM, jmol-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: OK. Found one. Minimization is not feasible. Just way too slow. Do you think this would be a good candidate for paralellization? We've been doing some interesting work in using the graphics processor

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Philip Bays
Observations on a Mac using 10.8.2, Safari 6.0.2, Firefox 17.0 In both browsers, the two mo items (5th, and 6th in center column) give an unrecognized file type error. Firefox has a small popup that says there is a bug in the applet load process at the beginning, but when dismissed, goes on a

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Philip Bays
hmmm. On playing some more, the firefox load error showing up in Safari has gone away. Perhaps a cache problem of some kind? On Nov 24, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Philip Bays pb...@saintmarys.edu wrote: Observations on a Mac using 10.8.2, Safari 6.0.2, Firefox 17.0 In both browsers, the two mo

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol - three months in

2012-11-24 Thread Herráez Sánchez Ángel
Yes! Firefox 16.0.2, Windows Vista Home Premium SP2 (not my usual computer - first time loading this page) -Mensaje original- De: Robert Hanson [mailto:hans...@stolaf.edu] Please let me know if with Firefox you are seeing the alert Firefox bug -- continuing at test2.htm

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Otis Rothenberger
I also get the Firefox error in Safari 6.0.2. It occurs on the first load - not on reload. After several cache clearing tests, the message always appears on the first load after the cache clear - not on reloads. It's almost like a reverse cache problem! Otis -- Otis Rothenberger

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Philip Bays
Yes, I can confirm this now. A fresh start or clearing the cache of safari results in the firefox error on the first load but not subsequently. In addition, I have been focusing on JSmol. However, on test2 page, I find that choosing either the signed or unsigned Jmol applet appears to load

[Jmol-users] R: Re: R: Re: two JSmols in the page

2012-11-24 Thread pino.stricc...@libero.it
Yes Bob. I fixed the problem since i updated the files. ThanksPino Messaggio originale Da: hans...@stolaf.edu Data: 24/11/2012 19.28 A: pino.stricc...@libero.itpino.stricc...@libero.it, jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.netjmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Ogg: Re: [Jmol-users] R: Re: two

[Jmol-users] R: Re: JSmol - three months in

2012-11-24 Thread pino.stricc...@libero.it
I can see the message alert firefox bug --continuingPino Messaggio originale Da: hans...@stolaf.edu Data: 24/11/2012 19.32 A: jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.netjmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Ogg: Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol - three months in

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Paul Pillot
The zip file available is apparently an older version (from the 11/13). There might be some caching problem there, preventing from downloading the latest version ? I don't know if it's time to discuss this yet, but I have some comments about JSmol: - speed performance: a colleague of mine

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Oliver Stueker
First of all: JSmol is a really GREAT idea and I am still stunned how good it works. One question: do pickCallbacks work with JSmol as well? Up to now I haven't seen a demo with pickCallbacks and right now I don't have time to try myself, but next year I'm going to start a project where I'll

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Oliver, They sure do. I'm using both atom and bond pickCallBacks to produce model kit actions. Otis -- Otis Rothenberger o...@chemagic.com http://chemagic.com On Nov 24, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Oliver Stueker wrote: First of all: JSmol is a really GREAT idea and I am still stunned how good it

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Oliver Stueker
Thanks Otis, that's great news! Oliver On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Otis Rothenberger osrot...@chemagic.com wrote: Oliver, They sure do. I'm using both atom and bond pickCallBacks to produce model kit actions. Otis -- Otis Rothenberger o...@chemagic.com http://chemagic.com On

Re: [Jmol-users] mnimization

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Definitely worth a try. It's quite a bit of code. I don't have any idea how to do it in the GPU. On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Dan Damelin dan...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 22, 2012, at - November 22 - 6:34 AM, jmol-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: OK. Found one. Minimization

Re: [Jmol-users] R: Re: JSmol - three months in

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, my bad. I was not properly waiting for core.z.js to load. Makes perfect sense. You should not be seeing that message anymore, at least if you clear your cache and load http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/test2.htm again. Bob On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:55 PM, pino.stricc...@libero.it

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Herráez Sánchez Ángel angel.herr...@uah.es wrote: - color labels fails with too much recursion (I reported a few days ago) definitely fixed a few days ago. at test2.htm: labels on;color labels blue works fine. - move gives errors - I know it's

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
I changed the name from JSmol.zip to jsmol.zip -- both were there, and you were getting the wrong one. Same for Angel, I suspect. Please be sure to use http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip All this was fixed a few days ago. -- Robert M. Hanson Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Good suggestions. A few comments Performance will be the issue, for sure. No WebGL on the iPhone, iPad, or Android tablet, so that won't help there. And there will always be WebGL compromises even if we do get that working. I think you can forget translucent surfaces with WebGL. It's not that