Re: [Jmol-users] Will unsigned applet be blocked soon?

2013-12-29 Thread Rzepa, Henry S
On 29 Dec 2013, at 20:00, Robert Hanson wrote: > I'm guessing it will be January 14: > > https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/entry/new_security_requirements_for_rias > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html > > As I understand it, all applets must be upd

[Jmol-users] Jmol 14.0.3 released

2013-12-29 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, this is it for 2013. Not a whole lot here ___JmolVersion="14.0.3" (synced with 14.1.3 2013.12.29) bug fix: getProperty atomInfo broken for modulated atoms bug fix: if load "" fails, last file name is lost bug fix: print a (operator) b not processing string parameter B consistently acros

Re: [Jmol-users] Will unsigned applet be blocked soon?

2013-12-29 Thread Robert Hanson
I'm guessing it will be January 14: https://blogs.oracle.com/java-platform-group/entry/new_security_requirements_for_rias http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html As I understand it, all applets must be updated. "signed" or not -- all must be signed, and local file re

Re: [Jmol-users] isosurfaceData as JVXL string

2013-12-29 Thread Robert Hanson
Have a desired isosurface as the current isosurface -- if necessary, use isosurface ID "" by itself to select. Then issue: show isosurface >From JavaScript, you could use: var xmlData = Jmol.evaluate(jmolApplet0, "script('show isosurface')") On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Jaime P

Re: [Jmol-users] Will unsigned applet be blocked soon?

2013-12-29 Thread Simone Sturniolo
Dear Eric, I did exactly that with my MagresView. I think it's going to be required starting January 2014, so in a few days, but I think Robert will know better on the topic of course. Simone 2013/12/28 Eric Martz > When running the unsigned Jmol applet under Java 1.7.0_45, I have > seen a re