I commited a simple change to revision 8585. After creating the povray file,
you should set the value:
noShadows = 'false';
in the .pov file. Run povray again on the .ini file and you will get the
same picture, but with shadows. Eventually this could/should be configurable
via jmol, either as an
Thanks, Pim, I didn't think of hermiteLevel for nucleic acid cartoon
display! Makes a huge difference.
However, the absence of shadows is still unsolved. Maybe Bob can
elaborate?
Frieda
On Nov 7, 2007, at 1:46 PM, pim schravendijk wrote:
You should set:
hermitelevel =5;
in your jmol s
You should set:
hermitelevel =5;
in your jmol script. That will make your trace look much better in jmol! And
povray just copies that. So actually it was already looking irregular in
jmol, just less clearly noticeable.
As far as shadows are concerned: The jpgs on bobs website are from a version
Sure, will email the files to you off list. Thanks.
When I compared Bob's pov-ray file to mine I saw lots of "no_shadow"
elements in both. So I did not try removing them from mine.
On Nov 7, 2007, at 1:08 PM, pim schravendijk wrote:
I have no idea about the lack of smoothness, but the fact t
I have no idea about the lack of smoothness, but the fact that no shadows
are present might be understandable. There are by default no shadows in the
povray output for jmol. They can be turned on by removing the no_shadow
elements in the povray script. I will make this more easy to do, and maybe
it
I am working on creating a pov-ray image as nice as those Bob posted at
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-11/povray.htm
When I run Bob's povray scripts in povray, I get the same beautiful
images he posted.
My tRNA povray script exported from Jmol comes out disappointingly
crude-l
6 matches
Mail list logo
