Re: [Jmol-users] translation change

2010-06-03 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
I have mixed feelings about this, hesitating between two options : - As Angel said, keeping the monolithic applet big can help force people to move to the split applet. - Modifying the way the monolithic applet works by removing the translations from it, but allowing to have

[Jmol-users] translation change

2010-06-01 Thread Robert Hanson
I made a change in the most recent development version of Jmol, but before we consider it for Jmol 12.0, I'd like input: Problem: JmolApplet.jar and JmolAppletSigned.jar are getting VERY large (2 Mb) Problem: approximately 30% of the size of the applet is translations. Comment: It seems

Re: [Jmol-users] translation change

2010-06-01 Thread Angel Herráez
My opinion: 1. I agree that we must stress the recommendation to use the split applet files. I'll take a look at the Wiki page to reinforce this. 2. I don't agree about removing the translations from the monolithic applet. If someone decides to use it for some reason (e.g. for local testing