I am trying to convert my site http://ultimate-battle-online.com into
a web App and so far I have:
$(document).ready(function(){
$('#main_content').load('cityhall.php');
$('#loading').hide();
$('a').click(function() {
> $(".faqList dt").add("dd") ...
What does the rest of the page look like? Does it matter that you
added all DDs on the page and not just the .faqList ones?
If you have a full test page somewhere it might be easy to debug with
IE8's built-in developer tools.
--~--~-~--~~
I have a definition list on my page with a few pairs of DT and DD tags
in it. I am adding a click function to the DT tag which i've verified
as working in FF3 but when I use it in IE7, the last DT element does
not receive the click function.
Is there anything wrong with this code?
$(document).r
On Apr 16, 12:47 pm, "mike.helgeson" wrote:
> Really? When given a helpful, simple, and absolutely correct response,
> that is how you act?
I'm not sure why you are referencing the version on rentalbeast. I was
referring to the version on my laptop, which does not have this
problem. As it happens
Just to point out: plugins are "third-party", which means the jQuery
team or documentation has no responsability on them. There is
obviously commitment on keeping everything as up to date as possible,
but it's unreasonable to expect that anyone will keep track of
versioning in 2348 plugins.
BTW,
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/checkboxes/jquery.checkboxes.js?rev=4734#L36
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/checkboxes/jquery.checkboxes.js?rev=4734#L73
On Apr 16, 1:48 am, Pink Pig wrote:
> On Apr 15, 7:11 pm, Ricardo wrote:
>
> > Try a search for '@' in the plugin fil
Really? When given a helpful, simple, and absolutely correct response,
that is how you act?
http://www.rentalbeast.com/ScriptLibrary/jquery.checkboxes.js
Here is a mirror to the code in case Bill gets self conscious and
fixes the "obvious".
http://codepad.org/SidAtyeO
On Apr 16, 12:04 pm, Pink
Maybe you need to use a better text editor?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_editor#Search_and_replace
--Klaus
On 16 Apr., 18:04, Pink Pig wrote:
> On Apr 16, 1:04 am, David Zhou wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Pink Pig
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 15, 7:11 pm, Ricardo
Barely anyone actually bothers to do it + You never said you did = We
assume you may not have done it and suggest it
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Pink Pig wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 1:04 am, David Zhou wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Pink Pig
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
DBJDBJ wrote:
> Maybe one can do this, as jQ author writes: "weird characters in its
> ID" . But this is a bad programming practice.
> Why would anyone do that? When was the last time (if ever) you did
> that? If Matt Brenna want to do some indexing of some elements there
> are much safer,scaleab
On Apr 16, 1:04 am, David Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Pink Pig
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 15, 7:11 pm, Ricardo wrote:
> >> Try a search for '@' in the plugin files, it shouldn't be hard.
>
> >> On Apr 15, 3:59 am, Pink Pig wrote:
>
> >> > Maybe you guys should stop patting y
Hi John,
That seems to remove many of the leaks, but still leaves a comment, a
script, a form and 3 DIVs. The script is caused by the removeChild
just after the code you posted. Not had chance to check where the
others come from, might try and dig into it more when I get home.
All of the element
Thanks Nick.
Also I have tried IE8 and concluded that what si "recommended" in
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#typenmsp
also does not work in IE8.
So "dbj|root" we can forget about. At least for now.
I am deliberately using namespaces xml element so that I can have
cross browser storage in
Maybe one can do this, as jQ author writes: "weird characters in its
ID" . But this is a bad programming practice.
Why would anyone do that? When was the last time (if ever) you did
that? If Matt Brenna want to do some indexing of some elements there
are much safer,scaleable and robust ways to do
show animates the height and width of the element and inline elements
can't have a height or width. I recommend using fadeIn instead (since
that doesn't touch height/width) or making the element display: block
with a CSS float of left.
--John
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Raxit wrote:
>
>
Hmm - I wonder if it has to do with the attachEvent that we're testing.
If you comment out these lines, does the leak still exist?
if ( div.attachEvent && div.fireEvent ) {
div.attachEvent("onclick", function(){
// Cloning a node shouldn't copy over
Hi all,
I've been using Drip to try and track down some memory leaks in my
app, but as I started stripping code out, I discovered a simple blank
page including jQuery seems to leak. The elements seem to be all those
created by the jquery.support object (script, a, divs).
Happens in IE7 and IE8.
It seems like it'd be easy to special-case POST requests to make sure
that an empty string was sent. Could you file a bug on the issue?
Thanks!
--John
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Rebecca Murphey wrote:
>
> The issue didn't occur in IE; I haven't tested in C or S.
>
> As far as POSTing wi
The issue didn't occur in IE; I haven't tested in C or S.
As far as POSTing without data, I agree that this is illogical, but it
was what the client (as in the person who pays me, not as in the
browser) required to interface with their server-side code. I have
tried repeatedly to get them to use
Take a look and see if this is a known issue:
http://dev.jquery.com/search?ticket=on&q=fadeout
If so, you could add your test case to the ticket, otherwise open a new one.
Thanks.
- Richard
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:06 AM, weepy wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've got a problem where fadeOut does not work
Hi,
I am working on validation controls. I want to put some animation
effects when the error message gets displayed. Following is the html
page along with the script. My problem is whenever the message gets
displayed it appears on the next line. I figured that "show" method of
Jquery applies "dis
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Friesen
wrote:
>
> Fact is that jQuery does support using characters like :[] by escaping
> them with a \ and that should be noted when someone does not know.
It's noted here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_select_an_element_t
On Thu, April 16, 2009 11:17 am, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
> jQuery selectors are not namespace-aware, so they only use
> getElementsByTagName (rather than getElementsByTagNameNS) to retrieve
> elements by their nodeName attribute (rather than by localName and
> namespaceURI).
Before anybody else pi
On Thu, April 16, 2009 1:20 am, DBJDBJ wrote:
>
> If I do this :
>
> $("head").prepend(" dbj:root>")
>
> how do I then select dbj:root by tag name ?
>
> A: $("dbj:root")
>
> B: $("dbj\:root")
>
> C: $("root")
>
> Any idea anyone ?
jQuery selectors are not namespace-aware, so they only use
getElem
24 matches
Mail list logo
