On 1/20/10 5:44 AM, DBJDBJ wrote:
1.
Are WebSockets officially part of HTML5 ? Mike I can see the specs,
yes. But this is definitely would be the most questionable HTML5
detail, it seems to me?
They used to be part of html5, but now are just lumped in the following
group:
"Features that a
On 1/19/10 4:52 AM, DBJDBJ wrote:
@Tato, WebSocket is specified by Google Inc, and (surpise?) it works
already in CHROME.
This isn't quite true. WebSockets are being specced both in the W3C and
WHATWG, and is not a Google product despite their early implementation.
Google has a plan to have 1
On 1/11/10 8:26 PM, DBJDBJ wrote:
Simple and effective ... Thanks.
My approach is 'slightly' different ( http://dbj.org/dbj/?p=470 ) but
perhaps sacrifices size and simplicity to be (maybe) faster.
Does anyone know why CHROME window.JSON.parse accepts non-standard
strings ? I am writing this in
Hi Clifford,
Can you be more specific about how this is broken, and in what browsers?
It would also be most helpful if you linked to your previous
message--many don't the time to go digging through the archives, even if
that just entails searching for Clifford Heath.
Cheers,
Mike
On 1/8/10
t's really
> hard to force all the leaf nodes to update in an automated fashion.
> Once we figure that out we'll be able to do nightlies in a more-timely
> fashion.
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>
As a number of people have mentioned in a previous thread (http://
groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev/browse_thread/thread/
94cd4ab2543d3b01/a62a699a01d4f425?lnk=gst&q=nightly&pli=1), and
elsewhere in #jquery on freenode-- the nightly at
http://code.jquery.com/nightlies/jquery-nightly.js isn't quit
The other day I cloned a fresh repo and, as I was in a ruby state of
mind, built jquery using `rake` rather than the usual `make`. To my
surprise, I found one jquery2.js in /dist. Before leaking jquery2.js
to the Pirate Bay, I checked it out and it's nothing more than a
vanilla jquery.js. Any spec
Yeah, weird. I get 403s in Firefox, but 200s in Chrome, Safari, and Opera. :/
-Mike
On 12/25/09, Karl Swedberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 24, 2009, at 12:39 PM, blizzard wrote:
>
>> Here are a couple more links with the same problem:
>> Both are using jquery-1.4a2.js
>>
>> http://dev.docucopies.com
>
You're probably getting the Exception 5 due to the "-" in the attribute
name, which is illegal. That said, there's no such thing as a
-moz/webkit-border-radius attribute--those are CSS properties, which when
paired with legal values can reside in the style attribute of an element,
e.g.:
$('#broken
I just wanted to point out that the problem described for text-shadow can be
a lot more complicated than animating 4 different values, e.g.:
text-shadow: 1px 1px 3px #666, -1px -1px 3px #FFF, 1px 1px #666, -1px -1px
#FFF;
So here you have 14 values.
Also, box-shadow was removed from the CSS3 spe
10 matches
Mail list logo
