questions, questions, questions...
patrik+javascript=false(yet);
how to make my popup windows blur()?
html
head
title
jQuery clickCount
/title
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css media=screen
href=style.css
script type=text/javascript
I'm trying to use your beta 0.2.0 with jcarousel inside a table. Doing
this corrupts the table layout in IE 7. I have not tried it in other
versions of jcarousel. Below is a minimized example:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
The example shows jquery version 1.1.1, this is a copy/paste problem,
I am using jquery 1.1.2
sorry...
On 27 Maj, 11:12, Jens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use your beta 0.2.0 with jcarousel inside a table. Doing
this corrupts the table layout in IE 7. I have not tried it in other
Hi
On 27 Mai, 11:12, Jens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use your beta 0.2.0 with jcarousel inside a table. Doing
this corrupts the table layout in IE 7. I have not tried it in other
versions of jcarousel.
it seems that the width of the table cells are calculated before
jcarousel has
Hi i have to build a custom tooltip
how can i get the current x and y mouseposition?
OOP's
many of my popup-in-background works perfect, not in FireFox though.
It pops to a new tab, which is not blurred. If I use other settings,
than just 'window.open', like scrollbars=.. width=.. etc, it pops my
new win in a new window blurred.
So to redefine my question, is there any way to
Answer to myself,
after searching for the answer if one can blur() tabs in FireFox, the
answer seems to be: NO!
i am not sure whether jquery has this or not
you can check out these articles that explains how to check the mouse
position with just javascript (without jquery)
http://www.quirksmode.org/js/events_properties.html#position
http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_events.html#mousepos
hope this helps
did u try cluetip?
HYPERLINK
http://examples.learningjquery.com/62/http://examples.learningjquery.com/6
2/
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alexander Petri
Sent: dimanche 27 mai 2007 12:08
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] get the current
Hi Jan,
That did the trick. Now it works in FireFox, IE7 and Opera.
But why does it work better when ul/li is encapsulated into divs?
In FF there was no need for the div encapsulation.
/Jens
On 27 Maj, 12:29, Jan Sorgalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 27 Mai, 11:12, Jens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an issue with your CSS. IE6 doesn't seem to like the .class#id
selector. You might need to rethink your approach. Perhaps keep the
unordered list and add the class to the li. That way you can reference
each part like this: .class #id
Hope that helps.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/26/07,
Hi,
Is there any plugin or solution to make image preview like at
TemplateMonsters.com
I've been working on improving Sam Collet's original timePicker.
Here is the result: http://labs.perifer.se/timedatepicker/
The demo is a Google Calendar-like time/datePicker. It's far from
perfect, most of the issues are with the datePicker though, which for
example not yet have support for
When the function 'globalEval' is evaluating script source that
contains html comments (i.e. !--), it will get 'syntax error'. html
comments should be stripped before execution.
Example:
-script source
script language=javascript
!--
//alert(typeof WebControls.registerListControl);
why do you have !-- comments -- instead of /* comments */ in a script?
On 5/27/07, Network Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the function 'globalEval' is evaluating script source that
contains html comments (i.e. !--), it will get 'syntax error'. html
comments should be stripped before
The HTML comments are to hide the script from older browsers that dont
understand javascript.
On 5/27/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why do you have !-- comments -- instead of /* comments */ in a script?
On 5/27/07, Network Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the function 'globalEval'
Thanks Brandon, that cleared it up.
On May 27, 12:46 pm, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an issue with your CSS. IE6 doesn't seem to like the .class#id
selector. You might need to rethink your approach. Perhaps keep the
unordered list and add the class to the li. That way you
I think the problem is not the javascript, but instead the browser.
Trying to change the display of a thousand items can cause it to be a
little slow. I present to you a small example, that shows javascript
can handle many items at once, and since the browser only has to
display a few items at
Thanks for the tips.
Always using element.class in selectors makes sense, I should make it
a habbit rather than being lazy. I understand about the idea of ID for
a unique instance and classes for repeated types, but this was thrown
together rather quickly as a demo, so the semantics aren't
The older browsers that jQuery doesn't support?
On 5/27/07, Matt Stith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML comments are to hide the script from older browsers that dont
understand javascript.
On 5/27/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why do you have !-- comments -- instead of /* comments */
On May 28, 5:10 am, Matt Stith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML comments are to hide the script from older browsers that dont
understand javascript.
The use of HTML comments inside script elements hasn't been needed
since Navigator 2 or IE 3. I doubt that anyone is still using those
No, in HTML, to comment something out and have it not evaluated by the
browser, you do !-- COMMENT --.
So, a little thing that alot of javascript developers do to hide the
javascript from older browers (ones that dont support javascript at all,
like cell phone browsers), and make it so that the
well, I've developed an admin system which rely heavely on jQuery.
But, safari can't seem to append html to empty div's (or perhaps any
div) - is there a fix to this?
im doing something like this:
var str = 'lorem ipsum';
$(#emptyDiv).append(str);
But nothing happens, works in firefox
that's much better... it will solve everything, except those old
browserwill see // // instead of nothingness.
RobG, didn't Nav 2 and IE 3 handle script tags? I thought we were talking
about the original couple of browsers that followed 'WorldWideWeb'
On 5/27/07, Matt Stith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Safari makes lots of false steps in its efforts at optimization. I always
try the webkit version at http://nightly.webkit.org/
If it still croaks, put a nbsp; in the div.
On 5/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I've developed an admin system which rely heavely on jQuery.
If you know the div is empty, and you just want to put a string in
it, you could do this instead:
$('#emptyDiv').text(str);
If you're not sure it's going to be empty, you could try this:
var $maybe = $('#emptyDiv');
if $maybe.is(':empty') {
$maybe.text(str);
} else {
$maybe.append(str);
}
True, but alot of cell phone browsers will show the scripts if its not
commented out.
On 5/27/07, RobG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 28, 5:10 am, Matt Stith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML comments are to hide the script from older browsers that dont
understand javascript.
The use of
Hmmm I'm curious ... which cell phone browsers will show the script?
Do you have or know of any articles on the topic?
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/27/07, Matt Stith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, but alot of cell phone browsers will show the scripts if its not
commented out.
On 5/27/07, RobG
I tried a simple program to do that in Safari,Webkit, Opera Firefox, it
works as advertised. Did I miss something?
http://cigar.dynalias.org/plugins/debug/safari.html
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd;
Well i dont know specifically, but im sure at least the older ones do. Any
newer phones should hide it, but i dont know any specifics.
On 5/27/07, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm I'm curious ... which cell phone browsers will show the script?
Do you have or know of any articles on
Hello everyone,
In a project, a few weeks ago, I needed support for something like
@attr!=val, that is selecting all attributes which don't have a
certain value (for example selecting all divs which don't have a
certain class). I was wondering if support for something like this is
planned, if
Glen's suggestions should work.
For classes, the best way is probably to use the class selector,
along with not (either as a method or a pseudo-class). So in
addition to Glen's examples, you could do this:
$('p:not(.myclass)')
For other attributes, you can do something like this, too:
Haved tested tiling yet, but give this a try
http://khurshid.com/jquery/iepnghack/
A minor upgrade. a neat feature to help debugging bound events, like click
and keyup...
plus clicklogger to report back where your users clicked and when!
http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/plugins/debug/
--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
Didn't seem to work.
I changed my strategy though. I put a regular IMG png on the page with a
width of 100%.
Check it out: http://www.sparkt.com/index.htm
This is a crazy strategy I am using the achieve the results. Rather than
tiling, I just give them 100% width or height.
The fade on the top
Hi rob,
Thanks a lot. Your answers are very helpful.
cheers,
james
On May 23, 4:25 pm, Rob Desbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl,
Any particular reason why you would use a link to click the button to
perform the button's task, rather than just disposing of the button and
assigning its task
36 matches
Mail list logo
