is in play. I will post my findings to the bug report.
On 9/11/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a true bug. Could you submit a bug report?
http://dev.jquery.com/
--John
On 9/11/07, Benjamin Sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Url in question
Christof -
You should bring those points up for discussion again on the
jquery-dev list (they're more relevant now, now that 1.2 is out). The
dev list is the best way to talk with the core developer :-)
--John
On 9/12/07, Christof Donat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The end result is
is in play. I will post my findings to the bug report.
On 9/11/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a true bug. Could you submit a bug report?
http://dev.jquery.com/
--John
On 9/11/07, Benjamin Sterling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Url in question:
http
John...ust to clarify. When you say absolute and relative this is what I
think those mean...?
Absolute = move to X.
Relative = move X to new position.
Is this correct?
Yep!
--John
You're in luck! jQuery already pre-empties an element inside .html().
Calling .html() actually does:
.empty().append(html string);
Although, there's a lot of other issues at play inside .append() in
order to make it work cross browser, so those innerHTML benefits have
probably be nullified in
.html() only gets the innerHTML for the first matched element. What
are you trying to do with the children?
--John
On 9/12/07, Brook Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to simply grab the children of a div. The markup is:
div id=content
div
You'll have to ask Brandon, as .offset() is his baby. The core offset
doesn't take any options (unlike the old one in Dimensions). However,
this new offset is now the default way to check for offset - Brandon
has removed it from Dimensions in favor of just maintaining the one in
core.
--John
On
the grandparents. Is children different?
Glen
On 9/12/07, Richard D. Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:20 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.html() only gets the innerHTML for the first matched element.
i think that's what
If a show animation is stopped part way it's width will be at a
specific pixel amount (like, 75px, for example). Thus, you'll need to
move the width (and height and opacity) to it's final state before be.
Possibly something like this might work:
$('.join_reasons').css({height: 'auto', width:
Yep: We actually do it right. Getting it to work correctly, cross
browser, is phenomenally hard problem. We have to serialize the HTML
string to DOM Nodes and then inject those directly.
In your case, you'd be much better off building a single long HTML
string then injecting that directly (using
Did you remember to include the color animation plugin?
--John
On 9/12/07, Equand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i also had a no conflict upgrade and a little speed enhancement...
thought there's a problem with animate bg new feature...
On Sep 12, 11:37 pm, polyrhythmic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing in that area was changed in 1.2. Do you have some more
information - possibly a demo?
--John
On 9/12/07, Bob Buffone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the $(selector) in 1.1.4 and it always returned an array
that you could change to and append.
$(#myDiv).append(Some HTML);
This
You should post this to the jQuery UI group, where this is discussed:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-ui/
Or, reply to the thread that you linked to.
--John
On 9/11/07, PragueExpat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've posted a problem that I'm having with droppables and jQuery here:
thought I
would try here. The problem is a show-stopper for a large application.
- Original Message -
From: John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:43 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: too much recursion in newest droppable - jQueryUI
Could you try again? I'm not sure why you would get that.
--John
On 9/11/07, George Blouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting a 404 when I try to go to the Blog entry.
On Sep 10, 10:06 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.2 has been released!
More
Nope, it's not - we decided to leave it out, give it time to grow and adapt.
--John
On 9/11/07, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have to call the live method, but I believe that it's built
into the core now.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Calling -1760px will animate the property relatively another -1760
pixels to the left.
If you want to animate it to the absolute position: -1760, do:
.animate({ left: -1760 })
jQuery 1.1.2 only supported passing in numbers for animations, so
seeing it work for you is quite surprising.
--John
Stop animations were added in 1.2:
http://docs.jquery.com/Effects/stop
Full release notes:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.2
--John
On 9/11/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard from someone that the jQuery team or someone was working on being
able to stop an animation and
it is
stopped. If i become deperate i can always try to create a plugin that does
it.
John Resig wrote:
Stop animations were added in 1.2:
http://docs.jquery.com/Effects/stop
Full release notes:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.2
--John
On 9/11/07, Eridius [EMAIL
.val() will return it's value - regardless of its checked state.
However, the serialize methods take into account the checked state and
won't return teh value if it isn't checked.
--John
On 9/11/07, Pyrolupus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One questions about new functionality, specifically
We load the demos in an iframe, that must push it into the history.
Anyone have any thoughts?
--John
On 9/11/07, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed something odd on the documentation pages. The back button
is acting as though I've made multiple visits to the same page. For
fixed
On 9/11/07, Enrique Meléndez Estrada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is removeAttr() in the documentation API? is it gone?
--
Enrique Meléndez Estrada (2367)
Servicios Informáticos
Organización y Servicios Internos
Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón
, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We load the demos in an iframe, that must push it into the history.
Anyone have any thoughts?
--John
On 9/11/07, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed something odd on the documentation pages. The back button
is acting
.slice() is in 1.1.4 - we added it in that release, intentionally, so
that users of the 1.1.x branch would have something to upgrade to, to
get that functionality, before transitioning to 1.2.
--jOHn
On 9/11/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all!
i'm going through my plugins and
1) i've got a philosophical beef with the change in clone()'s
behaviour. Calling clone(false) is not functionally the same as
calling clone().empty(), as clone().empty() can require an arbitrarily
large amount of extra work which will then be discarded by the empty()
call. i rather liked the
What version of jQuery - and if you're using jQuery 1.2, do you have
the XPath plugin included?
--John
On 9/11/07, Giant Jam Sandwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(//hooks/errors/error,data);
If my XML contains an error node, everything is okay. If it does not
contain an error node, I get the
just wanted to report that i had absolutely not a single issue switching
from 1.1.4 to 1.2 and i use tons of plugins.
The speed gain for me is more obvious with this release than with the move
from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4. Also, animations and effects are smoother.
Interesting - I've now heard this
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.2 has been released!
More information (and a jQuery UI sneak peek!):
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/09/10/jquery-12-jqueryextendawesome/
Full release notes and download information:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.2
Enjoy!
--John
Posted to Digg, as well:
http://digg.com/programming/jQuery_1_2_jQuery_extend_Awesome
--John
On 9/11/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.2 has been released!
More information (and a jQuery UI sneak peek!):
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/09/10/jquery-12
Third paragraph under Removed Functionality says:
Fixed. Btw, it is a wiki ;-)
: John Resig
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.2 has been released!
More information (and a jQuery UI sneak peek!):
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/09/10/jquery-12-jqueryextendawesome/
Full release notes and download information:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.2
Enjoy!
--John
That's great to hear! Thanks for letting us know :-)
--John
On 9/9/07, mawebgeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was reading the thread about justfutoncovers.com and the sub-thread
about getting a list of sites using jQuery, then I checked the listing
page and saw MiamiHerald.com, well, as a
You need to define your variables, you must put a 'var' in front of
them, otherwise IE could throw an error.
Thus, lines like this (where you're defining a variable for the first time):
username = $(#txtUserName).val();
Should become this:
var username = $(#txtUserName).val();
A more complete
Hard to say - unless we get some video equipment, it's rather unclear.
--John
On 9/7/07, YoctoGram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will you broadcast video of those conferences for us that live far far away?
:)
---
Yocto
- Original Message -
From: John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Everyone -
We're going to be having the first all-day jQuery mini-conference
October 27th, here in Boston, MA. Already, a large portion of the
jQuery team will be attending and giving talks - so if you're
interested in meeting some of the people who've helped to make jQuery
possible and
I forgot to mention but if you, or your company, is interested in
sponsoring this event, please contact me. We're generally looking for
a couple hundred dollars to help defray the cost of food - and if we
get enough, t-shirts for those who attend.
--John
On 9/6/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED
] On
Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 9:02 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] jQueryCamp '07 (Boston)
Hi Everyone -
We're going to be having the first all-day jQuery mini-conference October
27th, here in Boston, MA. Already, a large portion of the jQuery
Yikes...you weren't kidding about it not being free. That's quite a steep
price for only 3 days.
Actually, they just added a fourth day. Tuesday will be tutorials, Wed
- Fri will be talks. I'm going to be giving one tutorial (on
JavaScript Libraries), three talks (The Future of JavaScript,
Fixed!
On 9/6/07, Geoff Buesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link to dev mailing list here: http://dev.jquery.com/wiki
...goes to here: http://jquery.com/mailman/listinfo/dev_jquery.com
...which gives a Not Found error.
Should this link instead be pointed here:
That's correct - this has been fixed in jQuery SVN. I just pushed a
new nightly out containing this revised code:
http://code.jquery.com/nightlies/jquery-nightly.js
--John
On 9/6/07, traunic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just want to confirm that others are having this problem.
$(body).append(
line - 903
old: var ele =
jQuery(this.col.root.headerRows[0]).children().eq(this.col.index);
new: var ele =
jQuery(this.col.root.headerRows[0]).children().slice(this.col.index,
1);
This would actually be:
var ele = jQuery(this.col.root.headerRows[0]).children().slice(this.col.index,
Not unless you're able to scoop out my brain and moosh it into code form :-)
The only animation bit that's landed is the scrollLeft/scrollTop
animations. All of the rest is still in the works.
Here's a nightly that you can use, if that interests you:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.js
Bind-early-and-execute-later is nightmare of these $s.
jQuery completely works around this. Just put your function definition
inside of a closure. So you should put it inside:
jQuery(document).ready(function($){
function myfunc(){
$(div).bind(...);
}
});
or like so:
(function($){
It's back up, sorry about that.
--John
On 9/4/07, traunic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
planet.jquery.com does not appear to be working.
On Jul 12, 2:41 pm, Richard D. Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am pleased to announce the latest jquery.com service:
http://planet.jquery.com/
What
We've discussed this on the dev list:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev/browse_thread/thread/045ea5af409adb86
For now, just be sure to use the full HTML syntax, we'll try to get a
fix in place here real quick.
--John
On 9/3/07, devsteff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I figured
jQuery already has a .noConflict() method that completely removes any
conflict with $.
You can find out more information here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Libraries
and here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery.noConflict
--John
On 9/3/07, jack.tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The home of yShout is at http://yurivish.com/yshout/ Yuri only requires a
small donation and he will send you the link to a zip file.
Um, that's not really a donation then, is it?
--John
My opinion is that the word payment is more than adequate for this
situation. I really do wonder how low he will go, considering jQuery and its
countless plugins are offered for free? ;)
That's what confuses me - it use to be open source/free software, back
when he first released it. But now
Can you post this to the jquery-dev list as opposed to the general
discussion list? Thanks.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On 9/2/07, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A number of folks have independently come across this issue. What I
would like to hear from John Resig
$(.next.open)
The same works in normal CSS.
--John
On 9/2/07, xni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to select elements with two class (eg: h5 class=next
open. I tried $(.next open) but it failed. Does anyone know how to
do it?
Thanks in advance. Xavier
http://docs.jquery.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_I_disable.2Fenable_an_element.3F
--John
On 8/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need the check of a checkbox disable other inputs and change value
to others.
Here the code:
//click on keep prop cancel unnecesary
Try this:
$('#content').load('home.html', function(){
$(.seperator).height( $(this).height() );
});
--John
On 8/30/07, b0bd0gz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get the height value of a div that's contents are retrieved
from a separate html file using .load, but it only ever
Yes! With jQuery 1.1.4 you can do:
YAHOO.util.jQuery = jQuery.noConflict(true);
--John
On 8/30/07, howa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible?
e.g.
YAHOO.util.jQuery(#test).each(...);
What version of jQuery are you using?
--John
On 8/30/07, Dustin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone! My name is Dustin and was hoping I could get a little
help with a JQuery problem I've run into. I just started using JQuery
and have been trying out a little AJAX when I ran into
When does return false not work?
--John
On 8/30/07, Rafael Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there anyone who have a snippet to really prevent the something is
fired.
Sometimes my return false doesn't work on FF, IE6 and IE7. hehe =(
And i see mootools can do something like this:
Here's a one-liner:
$('table tr').slice(1,-3);
--John
On 8/29/07, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Felix,
As of jQuery 1.1.4 there is a new slice() method which works similar to the
JavaScript native Array.slice() method, except on jQuery objects. Therefore,
I guess you could do
In what browser are you seeing this?
--John
On 8/28/07, CM-Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello! I use utility Drip (http://www.outofhanwell.com/ieleak/
index.php?title=Main_Page) for the control of memory-leak.
The Drip shows memory-leak even in such simple case:
html
head
(*)
into
context.getElementsByTagName(*)
On 8/28/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, unfortunately there's really no way around that. We had to make
that change so that there wasn't massive leaks and slowdowns on adding
events. IMO, having fast event adding and no leaks
/27/07, Olmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
I've been doing some digging to find that leak and I believe it had
been resolved since the 5th ticket in our Trac.
http://dev.mootools.net/ticket/5
I also don't encounter any leaks in my own tests.
-Olmo M.
On Aug 25, 8:30 pm, John Resig [EMAIL
Slow server?
There's on reason for a 7 second delay of any sort in jQuery.
Do you have a demo of this online?
--John
On 8/27/07, oscar esp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am doing some test in order to migrate from 1.1.2 to 1.1.4... and I
got some strange result.
I have two combo, when you
Actually, from the looks of it, he's trying to include a plugin that
requires $ to be coming from jQuery - which is not the case once you
call noConflict().
@oscar: If you want to keep using that plugin with noConflict(),
you'll have to go in and rename all instances of $ to jQuery.
--John
On
Where? I see 1.1.4 on my end.
--John
On 8/27/07, Shelane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The front page of the jquery site still shows 1.1.3.1. When might
this be fixed to reflect the new version and new links?
On Aug 24, 1:46 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
jQuery
in client)
-1.1.2 1.1.3: less thant 1 second (from select an item in client
after the second combo is load in client)
Seems that 1.1.2 1.1.3 is faster than 1.1.4
On 27 ago, 18:09, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Slow server?
There's on reason for a 7 second delay of any sort
Yeah, that's pretty much exactly it. Not entirely sure how we're going
to get around this - this issue has cropped up twice now, with Ajax.
--John
On 8/27/07, Theodore Ni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not looked at the code in depth, but I know that 1.1.4 supports
recursive $.extend(),
Umm, just FYI - those images are expressly copyrighted and are not
allowed to be distributed. Sounds like they need to be re-made from
scratch in order for them to stay in jQuery SVN.
--John
On 8/27/07, Sean Catchpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An interesting post, thank you.
I have created a
! Nice work. You can check it
out, it was originally build on version 1.1.3:
YAML (Yet Another Multicolumn Layout) Builder: http://builder.yaml.de/
-Tom
On Aug 24, 10:46 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.1.4 has just been released! The full details
Unfortunately, no. This is a limitation in all browsers in order to
limit security concerns. In jQuery 1.2 you'll be able to do
cross-domain Ajax, but only if you're working with Scripts or JSON
data.
--John
On 8/26/07, hogsmill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Has anybody used jquery for
I know $('head').append('script type=text/javascript src=.../'
+ 'script') has not worked in IE in previous versions of jQuery, but
I haven't tried it lately.
That works in 1.1.4.
--John
I just took a look at prototype.js and mootools.js, neither are
depended on a Lets hope if this best guess 13ms always works timer
concept.
Right, so they leak every single time you use them, both libraries are
quite naive about the issue of memory leaks.
If you're looking for some form of
When worse comes to worse, apply a fixed width to the element that
you're sliding down - sometimes that can fix sticky issues like this.
--John
On 8/25/07, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just added comments to my blog:
http://www.andyandjaime.com/
When the user submits, it posts
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.1.4 has just been released! The full details of this release
can be found on the jQuery blog:
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/08/24/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/
Suffice it to say that some significant speed increases, test coverage
increases, and API reductions
is 22kB and works perfectly I suggest update to the new
packer code.
I continue testing with my current projects (in this moment works well
with my old code for 1.1.2 version
of jQuery, without retouching the code) :-P
John Resig escribió:
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.1.4 has just been released
On 8/24/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
jQuery 1.1.4 has just been released! The full details of this release
can be found on the jQuery blog:
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/08/24/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready-for-12/
Suffice it to say that some significant speed
Fixed!
On 8/24/07, Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, August 24, 2007 1:47 AM John Resig said:
jQuery 1.1.4 has just been released! The full details of this release
can be found on the jQuery blog:
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/08/24/jquery-114-faster-more-tests-ready
() method
is the bulk of that logic and it doesn't seem feasible to replace that
function for one small 1-2 line change. The other suggestions are
small enough to be plugins but it requires the change to the .ajax()
method.
Thanks!
--
HLS
On Aug 24, 4:46 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED
The one issue I've heard seems related to if the script is in an
external domain - an error is thrown since jQuery is unable to
request and load that document. However, this is better than before,
where it simply wouldn't work cross browser.
However, in jQuery 1.2 a scheme will be in place to
Mike -
Actually, last night I realized that more plugins end up using it then
I previously realized, so I added it back in, but it's just an empty
function (does nothing).
--John
On 8/24/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon is correct. There was a recent change to the form plugin
An error like that makes me think that tje jquery-1.1.4.js file
doesn't exist - you should verify that it is there - and if not, is
there a page that we can see of it in action? (All the code that you
show should work just fine.
--John
On 8/24/07, atomicnuke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been
The .eq() method wasn't removed in 1.1.4, it was deprecated. All that
means is that you should begin to transition away from it to thew new
.slice() method (since .eq() will be removed in jQuery 1.2). Yeah, we
definitely wouldn't want to break plugins on a minor release, like
that.
--John
On
JavaScript can't find variables inside of a ..., you can change your code to:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('a.pack').click(function(){
var $href = $(this).attr('href');
)
.hide()
.filter(:first)
.show()
.end()
.end();
--John
On 8/23/07, SeViR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
recently I have read the slides published by John Resig about his
first Google Tech Talk:
http://ejohn.org/blog/building-a-javascript-library/
In the slide
is also valid...
$(div.section)
.find(dt)
.addClass(section)
.click(function(){
$(this).next().toggle();
})
.end()
.find(dd)
.hide()
.filter(:first)
.show();
John Resig wrote:
;-) No problem. I love .end().
Although
http://docs.jquery.com/JQuery_1.2_Roadmap#Animating_scrollLeft.2FscrollTop
On 8/23/07, James Dempster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if the changes that allow animate scrollTop would be
making it to the next release?
e.g. http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/step/test2.html
I am writing some code using end() method and really, I don't see the
time where
.onclick() might return a statement that /requires/ a .end() to exist
Some example??
Right, that's because it doesn't exist :-) Only the following code is
guaranteed to work:
$(div.section)
.find(dt)
doesn't really occur until the outer
one has? I just can't seem to get dynamic values into each handlers
like that. I know that with Prototype, there is a function(){}.bind
feature, is that used on each also?
Thanks,
Matt
On Aug 23, 12:16 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like so
You can always grab a nightly of jQuery:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.js
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.pack.js
--John
On 8/23/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to download the lastest build(not meaning 1.1.3.1 but the very
lastest build that has not been
You could just pass it in to a jQuery object:
$(table).append(tr.../tr) // or whatever you need to do
You can pass in a reference to the jQuery object.
--John
On 8/23/07, ralphz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I discovered jQuery few weeks ago and start playing with it few days
ago. It's
I don't know what you're doing, but it works great for me:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/test/each.html
I'm using value so that it's easy to see the results.
--John
On 8/23/07, goodieboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well the syntax in both examples are wrong! :) thanks to my original
example.
.. and i already try include mootools before
jQuery
and then .noConflict()
And this problem with mootools is not recognized as a bug by mootools
developer :(
All the best
Carlos
On Aug 22, 5:59 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try includingMootools
, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, just include Mootools /then/ jQuery.
--John
On 8/23/07, kj187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thx for answer.. is there no quick solution ? i need both librarys
greetz julian
On 23 Aug., 14:36, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Try including Mootools, then jQuery, then doing the .noConflict()
stuff and see if that works.
--John
On 8/22/07, kj187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i use jquery and mootools.
But i have a problem, after loading the site, i became an js error
this.$events[type].keys has no properties
Like so:
$('input').each(function(i){
$(this).attr('name', i);
});
Nice and simple!
--John
On 8/23/07, goodieboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I thought I knew jQuery pretty well. But this is completely
stumping me. What I want to do is iterate through a newly attached set
of input
the CSS one (FF
2.0.0.6 Mac OS 10.4.10 Intel)? I would think that they'd both be the same
speed. Having said that, seeing the DOM move all the blocks in unison like
that is f'ing awesome!
--Aaron
On 8/20/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've re-done the original demo using jQuery's step
On Aug 7, 8:53 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug was found just after the 1.1.3.1 release - a ticket was
opened on it and a new version was provided to those that were
effected. The fix will be included in the upcoming 1.1.4 release
(which should be coming out today
Oops, haha, that's what I get for leaving in my debugging code. Try again.
--John
On 8/20/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 20, 7:18 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've re-done the original demo using jQuery's step function (dunno why
I didn't think of this before
It's because you're trying to load a file from your local hard drive -
you need to have it hosted on the same domain as your page. (This is a
restriction in place in all browsers.)
--John
On 8/19/07, G[N]Urpreet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Was trying to make a horizontal accordion with
This is absolutely clutch. I've been watching this plugin progress
nicely and I'm very pleased with how it's turned out. I highly
recommend that everyone give it a try.
--John
On 8/20/07, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you may be familiar with Behavior. It was a first attempt
I dunno, but using no jQuery at all, your alpha filter doesn't appear
to be set up properly:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/fadeTo/
--John
On 8/17/07, Aaron Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an element with this style associated with it:
filter:alpha(opacity=0);
Yes, a POST will be performed instead. I updated the docs to represent this:
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax#load.28_url.2C_params.2C_callback_.29
--John
On 8/18/07, angelogladding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I attempt to load into a ul (#tags) jQuery seems to be sending a `POST`
request.
Right, that's because you're not supposed to pass in a string, you
pass in an options block. If you pass in a string it splits the string
up by character, which is not what you want.
--John
On 8/18/07, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:01 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
201 - 300 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
