n using find(), just select by ID as a subset of the
DOM node..
alert($(html).find("#test") becomes
alert($("#test", html));
Hope some of this helps... cheers!
Nic Luciano
Senior Web Developer @ AdaptiveBlue
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
http://www.linkedin.com/in/niclucian
Oh wow, I didn't realize JSON would act like an associative array in that
way...
Thanks guys!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
>
> foo[fooProp] // returns "barVal"
>
> Is that what you mean?
>
> -- Josh
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [
I considered it, but because of the ambiguity I run into I just need
to specify every single Css property... Thought there might be
something clever I could do with jquery but pobably not... Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Ricardo Tomasi
wrote:
You could a u
Close but You should be using .get() for this, with an onsuccess
callback (also see datatype). .getscript is solely for loading
javascript files to execute.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:13 PM, "brian.overl...@gmail.com" > wrote:
I'm using $.getScript to get XML from a rem
everything went OK).
Data type is the format of the data you are expecting to return (html for
plain html to insert into your document, json for js objects, etc)...
Nic Luciano
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicluciano
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Tim Johnson wro
You should think about using jQuery's ajax (
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.ajax#options) while you're at it... if
you did, you could attach your .corners() function to ajaxComplete (
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/ajaxComplete#callback) so you wouldn't have to
include it in every call. Glad to he
Hey Jack-
I think this is the right group for these issues:... :)
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
Nic Luciano
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicluciano
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:53 PM, jack wrote:
>
> The following works on before Version:
&g
PS - Again, I don't even know for sure if this is the issue. :)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Nic Luciano wrote:
> Hey Davis...
>
> So, the issue is that your calling corners once, it executes on all the
> elements currently IN the document. When you load new elements via
Hey Davis...
So, the issue is that your calling corners once, it executes on all the
elements currently IN the document. When you load new elements via AJAX,
they are appended AFTER corners has already done it's magic.
So where it says...
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4){
var res = xmlHttp.respo
You need to be executing the Javascript in the callback of your AJAX
function, NOT in the head of the document you are loading.
Aside, if you are using jQuery anyway you should consider using it's own
AJAX functions...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Davis wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> first, i just
$("div :last-child");
(or this wacky way I tried before I learned CSS selectors
$("div").children()[$("div").children().size() - 1])...)
Nic Luciano
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicluciano
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ri
ta
in your success callback, just re-execute your .corners() function.
If that's not right it should point you in the right direction... cheers!
Nic Luciano
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicluciano
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Davis wrote:
>
>
Try starting a timer on mouse down, and only register the click event
if the timer is less than x milliseconds. The fringe case for this
would be users who click for seconds, or who drag in milliseconds.
I'm .positive. this is not the best possible way to handle this, but
it could be a la
What exactly are you trying to do, what is the issue? Maybe just preference
here (and I'm also just guessing what you're asking) but I don't see a
reason not to put the events on the elements themselves
$("ul li a").click(function() {
$(this).parent().parent().find(".active").removeClass("
Hey Bartee,
I think your problem is that .length() returns the number of elements in the
object you're acting on. In you're case, there's only one object (a text
node). So, it should return one. What you're actually looking for is
$("div#div2").text().length;
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:25 PM, bar
It's unlikely there's a plugin to do what you want to do since javascript is
client side, and saving to any sort of database would require at least some
web service.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Pragan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to implement a rating system using thumbs up thumbs down.
Anyone? I was looking forward to using jQuery in the extension but I might
have to do without... :[
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Nic Luciano wrote:
> Hm, that makes sense. So, I suppose I could do something like
>
> jQuery.noConflict();
> var doc = window.content.document;
&
> >
> > --Karl
> >
> > ____
> > Karl Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Nic Luciano wrote:
> >
> > > That's true, but that's exactly ho
That's true, but that's exactly how it's supposed to function.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, jQuery Lover wrote:
>
> No he is not!
>
> Suppose you have this scenario:
>
>
>
>Home
>Rules
> Pilots
> Briefing
> IGC
Simple correction, I meant the first child of it's parent*. Just in case it
wasn't clear.
Cheers-
Nic
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Nic Luciano wrote:
> The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
>
The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
whic
This might work for Superfish but isn't it also a possibility by doing this
you could do the exact opposite of what you're trying to accomplish, as this
could also override any other third party CSS you're trying to use? While I
guess it's not technically incorrect, there's no reason to include
!im
Hm, that makes sense. So, I suppose I could do something like
jQuery.noConflict();
var doc = window.content.document;
jQuery("#id", doc);
Which would solve the issue that jQuery doesn't live in the HTML anymore
(and lives in the browser). But how would this work on .ajax functions? Do I
have
23 matches
Mail list logo
