Hey Oliur,
You could just do that after the document ready:
$(document).ready(function(){
$(".divname").animate({
opacity: 0.5,
}, 300 );
});
That should do the trick, I think.
Greetz,
Rick
On Jan 9, 2:53 pm, Oliur wrote:
> when the DOM is ready you can write
>
> $(document).re
xplained $(this).attr should
> do the trick with grabbing what type the input element is. I
> appreciate your help. I had to change .input to :input since I'm
> filtering out by the element not by a class named input.
>
> -Thanks,
> Rich
>
> On Jan 8, 7:11
Hey,
I would add another class to the div you want to show. That way you
can keep it selected until you go over another div. Like this:
$("a.mSelect").hover(
function () {
$('.selected').each(function(){
$(this).removeClass('selected');
$(this).hide();
});
Hey,
I would add another class to the div you want to show. That way you
can keep it selected until you go over another div. Like this:
$("a.mSelect").hover(
function () {
$('.selected').each(function(){
$(this).removeClass('selected');
$(this).hide();
});
Hey,
I would add another class to the div you want to show. That way you
can keep it selected until you go over another div. Like this:
$("a.mSelect").hover(
function () {
$('.selected').each(function(){
$(this).hide();
});
var month = $(this).attr("rel");
$(
Hey,
Maby this will help:
$('.input').each(function(){
alert('Value: ' + $(this).val() + ' - Type: ' + $(this).attr
('type'));
});
That should do the trick. Just let me know.
Greetz,
Rick
On Jan 7, 11:33 pm, rich wrote:
> Hello all, I'm relatively new to JavaScript. I would like to loop
I would use:
$('a').click(function(){
var car_id = parseFloat($(this).attr('class'));
$('#' + car_id).show();
});
Haven't tested this, but should work if I read your description right.
Greetz,
Rick
On Dec 18, 1:57 pm, imot3k wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm making a website for a garage. In the car
I usually use this code:
$('#textbox_id').val()
But I don't know id it is different in .net
Hope this helps. Greetz,
Rick
On Dec 19, 11:48 am, suresh kumar wrote:
> I am using jquery block to show the popup window. In which the popup
> has two textboxes with two buttons. When user clicking th
because of the async of javascript I normally use callback functions
to do the value passing. So instead of return true or return false in
a ajax function, it's better to call a function with the true or false
as a parameter.
Just my two cents ;)
On 12 dec, 20:24, Jojje wrote:
> How deep in the
k for an error.
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.get#urldatacallbacktypehas some
> more information on that.
>
> -T.J.
>
> On Dec 9, 6:30 am, Cameron van den Bergh
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > Good day,
>
> > When executing an ajax request, i've noticed t
Hi,
To improve efficiency, try using contexts in order to restrict the
parsed DOM elements.
For example, if you know that all targeted elements are in . stuff .. target text... . then you should guide the selector engine towards the
target : $('#main .myclass '). Another synataxe
Good day,
When executing an ajax request, i've noticed the following problems :
- the textStatus callback parameter is always set to success ;
- the callback isn't triggered if a download error occurs (404 for
example).
I understand that the second problem might be unsolvable but is there
any way
Hey,
Best way to make sure that the form has been loaded is to use the load
callback function:
$('#formGen1').load('formGen1.jsp', function(){
//Callback function: Form has been loaded
//Code implementation
});
I usualy hide the form that I'm editing until it is ready to be shown.
Simple h
Hey,
Don't know if you mean when you hover over a div? Cause then you
should just use the hover event:
$('#divid').hover(function(){}
//Implement code while hovering
,function(){
// Implement code when you exit the div
});
Hope this helps.
Greetz,
Rick
Hey,
If you are referring to hovering your mouse over a div there is the
hover event:
$('#divid').hover(function(){
// Implement code while mouse is hovering div
},function(){
// Implement code while mouse leaves div
});
There are different mouse events too. Check them out at:
http://docs.
Hi Richard,
I also live in the Netherlands and ran into the same problem. I couldn't
find an answer online so i decided to write some addon methods myself.
I added the following two methods to the validator and that did the trick.
$.validator.addMethod("maxNL", function(value, element, param) {
I can't figure out how to check with jquery how deep a user has
scrolled into a page. Suppose you got a webpage with 3000px in height
but the actual viewport is just 768px high. So the user has to scroll
down to see the rest of the page. How do i get the current vertical
scroll value of the page.
Thank you, that is what i wanted.
Hello,
I'm trying to merge Carousel and Drag functions, but I'm facing
problem.
Here is the jCarousel lite page : http://www.gmarwaha.com/jquery/jcarousellite/
And here is my project : http://www.wir3d.net/tests/carousel_drag_02.html
Carousel pager works great, when you click a page, carousel
lugins/Validation/Methods/digits
>
> Jörn
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:03 PM, VaN wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm trying to make my password field regex-valid, but don't know what
> > to add.
>
> > Here is my code :
>
> > $.validator.add
Hi,
I'm trying to make my password field regex-valid, but don't know what
to add.
Here is my code :
$.validator.addMethod("integer", function(value, element) {
return !jQuery.validator.methods.required(value, element) ||
/^\d+$/
i.test(value);
}
, "Numbers only
Hi all,I couldn't find a good answer to this, although it has probably been
answered before, apologies!
I have a link
do it
And some jQuery code
$("#doit").click(function(){ // upon click
$.get(this.href); // call the URL
$('#doit').replaceWith("I've been there (undo)");
return false;
});
My p
is for free, in my spare time, to learn
> more about database calls, php, and js) and paints the data set that
> was queried down the page in sticky notes. It randomizes the color of
> the notes, and onload fades them in. There may be 50 stickies, or as
> few as one or two. Its pretty neat
The simple solution would be to use $.getScript(url, callback).
However, know that if you insert HTML anywhere in the page using
jQuery, it will search for and execute any script tags in that HTML
automatically. For example:
$.get('/my/url/with/html_and_jscript.html', function(data) {
$("#e
It's almost certainly giving you an error about cross-domain XHR
requests. Simply, you can't call URL's that start with "http://"; or
else it will throw an error.
Someone else may know how to get around that, but if you're referring
to your own host, just use a relative path.
To debug the issue
!
>
> On Jan 14, 11:28 pm, James Van Dyke wrote:
>
> > $(function() {
> > var i, numStickies = 9;
> > for (i = 1; i <= numStickies; i += 1) {
> > setTimeout( function() {
> > $(".sticky" + i + ":hidden").fadeI
I've always used transitional and had no problems, even with 1.3.
Transitional is still a standard, but let's some things slide.
However, if you're so concerned with bugs, you may want to wait until
1.3.1 or later. 1.3 is bound to have some lurking issues.
On Jan 15, 12:15 am, Karl Rudd wrot
The initial (function($) { was never closed.
Here's how I formatted it so everything lines up:
(function($){
var EYE = window.EYE = (function() {
var _registered = {
init: []
};
return {
init:
Ok... that's a hard page to get away from with all those alert boxes.
I know... no Firebug in IE. Poo.
I believe that "class" is not what IE calls that attribute. For
instance, element.class will return nothing. element.className is the
correct property. Try that.
Plus, you could shorten you
Try
$("#emilyLogin:not(.loggedIn), #joeLogin:not(.loggedIn)").click(
function(){}
);
I'm thinking that the nested IDs are causing issues that the new
selector engine can't handle. Since IDs are supposed to be unique per
page, listing a hierarchy is unnecessary. Multiple IDs on a page
woul
$(function() {
var i, numStickies = 9;
for (i = 1; i <= numStickies; i += 1) {
setTimeout( function() {
$(".sticky" + i + ":hidden").fadeIn(500);
}, 100 * i);
}
});
Not sure if that's faster, but it's shorter and easier to change.
On Jan 14, 11:19 pm, DJ
Does anyone else find the new API browser to be a bit cumbersome?
My gripes:
1) No "back" link at top of vertical navigation list. You must click
the category to cancel your choice and essentially go back. However,
this isn't very intuitive and there aren't any affordances to this
behavior sa
is a tag which doesn't require an ending tag. is
another as is . The W3C validator will actually warn you if you
end tags like that, though it's not a big deal.
When jQuery creates the HTML, I believe the code is injected into an
empty element and jQuery sees what the browser made of the stri
rk in jQuery. Does
anyone have any advice on how to do this?
--
Luke Van In
Alio Technologies
www.aliotech.com
Thanks, LiveQuery did it. (I'm a beginner :))
Peter
On Jul 14, 8:27 pm, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm having a little problem, perhaps someone can help me figure this
> > out because I'm a bit baffled.
>
> > In short: a link is clicked, I call a page with jquery ajax (the
Hi,
I'm having a little problem, perhaps someone can help me figure this
out because I'm a bit baffled.
In short: a link is clicked, I call a page with jquery ajax (the href
of the link is not followed). The page returns taconite xml, so far so
good. But then if I click the link that was changed
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> it does the job but I still find the behavior unexpected :P
>
> How could the documentation be changed to clarify the function so that
> you would expect its behavior?
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors/contains#text
a screen shot to illustrate my point ...
if I can venture an non-expert diagnostic, it seems that in the second
case jQuery considers that the html in the contains() statement is the
"context" of the statement and not the html document ...
EuGeNe -- http://www.3kwa.com
<>
thing like this might work...not tested.
> $(this).is(":contains(matchingText)")
>
> Glen
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 4:55 PM, Van <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The contains selector works fine with tags (a:contains()) etc. but
> > doesn't se
) on the resulting
> element, or modify the query slightly.
>
> As I said at the start, which method (or variation thereof) you choose
> to use is down to what else you want to do with the result (or lack
> of). None of the above are either 'right' or 'wrong', they
The contains selector works fine with tags (a:contains()) etc. but
doesn't seem to work with $(this). What is the best way to use
contains with "this"??
here is my scenario:
var matchingText = "Text2";
Text1
Text2
I want to see if the text in matchingText matches text in any of the
anchor ta
Hello,
I have a question about using the :contains filter to match the text
of an anchor tag...
Text 1
Text 2
...
I'm trying to use the ul.list selector to run through all anchor tag
descendants and check their .text() to see if it matches a query.
$(this:contains()) does not work, and I tri
I've found a few places in the interface plugin libs where the old
version of dequeue is used; they need to be replaced with the new
calls to work. The old version took two arguments, the new version
uses jQuery chainability. For example:
On line 473 of ifx.js change :
jQu
FYI, this version of Treeview raises warnings when validating against
JSLint in a few critical areas, and causes the JS compressor that I
use by LCASoft ( http://www.lcasoft.com/compress-js.html ) to break
the plugin. In SVN revision 3522, they are:
* On line 67, asignment not terminated with ;
*
44 matches
Mail list logo
