Performance wise, there should not really be any performance issues -
if you do it right.
A good reason to use jQuery for this is to separate coding from
markup, and also your data (RN, Location A, 1 Shift, etc.) from your
coding. Also, like you said, it'll keep the page's filesize small. If
your
I am setting an onClick for many rows doing this:
copy
I could set this information as attributes in other parts of the table
structure to get what I needed to make a way to wire these up via
jQuery. I could have hundreds of these links to wire up. I know that
my current way will produce more
her --
> usually CSS conflicts or other weird quirks come up and I dont know where
> to
> start
>
> Table Sorter
> http://tablesorter.com/docs/
>
> Tabs
> http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Tabs
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/jQuery-vs.-jQuery-
confusing to me when I have to combine the two scripts together --
usually CSS conflicts or other weird quirks come up and I dont know where to
start
Table Sorter
http://tablesorter.com/docs/
Tabs
http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Tabs
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/jQuery-vs
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/02/08/vs-2008-web-development-ho
t-fix-roll-up-available.aspx
For those of you who would be interested, the javascript intellisense tool
in VS 2008 (which was previously not compatible with jQuery AT ALL) has been
hotfixed (along with some other items
Validating with XHTML 1.0 strict it works correctly, thanks for all!!!
Thank you very much, i try this tomorrow ;)
On Jan 29, 6:21 pm, "Charles K. Clarkson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ZiTAL wrote:
>
> : Hi, i have done a very simple example of jquery slide, but it doesn't
> : work correctly in internet explorer, it blinks in the beginning and at
> : the end. Thank
ZiTAL wrote:
: Hi, i have done a very simple example of jquery slide, but it doesn't
: work correctly in internet explorer, it blinks in the beginning and at
: the end. Thanks for all (sorry for my bad english).
:
: link:
: http://zital.no-ip.org/jquery/
[gets on soap box]
Always, always,
Hi, i have done a very simple example of jquery slide, but it doesn't
work correctly in internet explorer, it blinks in the beginning and at
the end. Thanks for all (sorry for my bad english).
link:
http://zital.no-ip.org/jquery/
html code:
adasd
adasd
顶一下
顶
ks like
> > > > to me one of the big differences are all of the new functions
> > > > available in prototype.
>
> > > > What I am curious about, is does jQuery have support for these things
> > > > or in jQuery are you basically expected to use the easy access to DOM
> > > > objects to create the functionality you need as you go.
>
> > > > For example, in prototype, adds these methods to the form element
> > > > (http://www.prototypejs.org/api/form
> > > > ):
>
> > > > disable enable findFirstElement focusFirstElement getElements
> > > > getInputs request reset serialize serializeElements
>
> > > > Does jQuery have anything similar? In jQuery would you just write
> > > > these yourself? I can see the benefit of this being that you only
> > > > include the methods you need and there is no bloat. But I just
> > > > recently read that you can get a compressed prototype library down to
> > > > 26k - so isn't that almost the same as jQuery?
>
> > > > I guess I am just looking for a reason to use jQuery vs. Prototype and
>
> > > > an argument about why I don't need all those (useful?) methods
> > > > available in prototype? Anyone?
>
> > --
> > Dragan Krstić krdr
> >http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
st write
> these yourself? I can see the benefit of this being that you only
> include the methods you need and there is no bloat. But I just
> recently read that you can get a compressed prototype library down to
> 26k - so isn't that almost the same as jQuery?
>
> I guess I am
djeiquéri = brazilian LOL
On 8/7/07, Mika Tuupola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
>
> > say-ferry = American
> > say-kweery = UK
>
> gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
>
> --
> Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/
- Original Message
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype
From: Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Date: 8/7/2007 1:10 PM
>
> Joel Birch wrote:
>>
>> On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
>>>
>>>> say-ferry =
Am Dienstag, 7. August 2007 schrieb Klaus Hartl:
> Joel Birch wrote:
> > On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
> >>> say-ferry = American
> >>> say-kweery = UK
> >>
> >> gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
> >
> > jah-ee-kweery = Australian
>
> jä-kwärrie = german ;-)
ha? = bavarian ;-)
C
Joel Birch wrote:
On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
jah-ee-kweery = Australian
jä-kwärrie = german ;-)
--Klaus
On 07/08/2007, at 5:35 PM, Mika Tuupola wrote:
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
jah-ee-kweery = Australian
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
gee-kooery = Finnish Rally Driver
--
Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/
say-ferry = American
say-kweery = UK
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Tobias Parent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype
I feel like such a n00b - I've always pronounced it to rhyme with
I feel like such a n00b - I've always pronounced it to rhyme with
'say-ferry' .
DOH!
- Toby
It's not just that you got to call it "j" and then "query". And
it's not just that the word query is hard to pronounce on its own:
say "kweer-ee" really fast. You sound like a Disney ch
kind of tool. I'm not suggesting a name change,
> just pointing out what I think will hold it back.
>
>
>
> *From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Ganeshji Marwaha
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2007 10:47 PM
> *To:* jquery-en@go
Brook,
>For example, in prototype, adds these methods to the form element
>(http://www.prototypejs.org/api/form
>):
>
>disable enable findFirstElement focusFirstElement getElements
>getInputs request reset serialize serializeElements
As already stated by others, a lot of the those functions can
Hi,
I'll put it this way: I've been using JavaScript for quite some time -
begining with a small game in 1997. I've looked at a lot of libraries over
the time and always thought: "take out the stuff I don't need and I get the
rest much smaller than this stuff". jQuery was the first time this w
neshji Marwaha
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 10:47 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype
brook,
I am not sure if i will add substantially to what others have said above.
Still, i wanted to post this mail anyways because you might be more
comfortable
t; > or in jQuery are you basically expected to use the easy access to DOM
> > > objects to create the functionality you need as you go.
> > >
> > > For example, in prototype, adds these methods to the form element
> > > (http://www.prototypejs.org/api/form
> > > ):
> > >
> > > disable enable findFirstElement focusFirstElement getElements
> > > getInputs request reset serialize serializeElements
> > >
> > > Does jQuery have anything similar? In jQuery would you just write
> > > these yourself? I can see the benefit of this being that you only
> > > include the methods you need and there is no bloat. But I just
> > > recently read that you can get a compressed prototype library down to
> > > 26k - so isn't that almost the same as jQuery?
> > >
> > > I guess I am just looking for a reason to use jQuery vs. Prototype and
> >
> > > an argument about why I don't need all those (useful?) methods
> > > available in prototype? Anyone?
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dragan Krstić krdr
> http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
api/form
> > ):
> >
> > disable enable findFirstElement focusFirstElement getElements
> > getInputs request reset serialize serializeElements
> >
> > Does jQuery have anything similar? In jQuery would you just write
> > these yourself? I can see the benefit of this being that you only
> > include the methods you need and there is no bloat. But I just
> > recently read that you can get a compressed prototype library down to
> > 26k - so isn't that almost the same as jQuery?
> >
> > I guess I am just looking for a reason to use jQuery vs. Prototype and
> > an argument about why I don't need all those (useful?) methods
> > available in prototype? Anyone?
> >
> >
>
--
Dragan Krstić krdr
http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
t; getInputs request reset serialize serializeElements
>
> Does jQuery have anything similar? In jQuery would you just write
> these yourself? I can see the benefit of this being that you only
> include the methods you need and there is no bloat. But I just
> recently read that you
ed prototype library down to
26k - so isn't that almost the same as jQuery?
I guess I am just looking for a reason to use jQuery vs. Prototype and
an argument about why I don't need all those (useful?) methods
available in prototype? Anyone?
. But I just
recently read that you can get a compressed prototype library down to
26k - so isn't that almost the same as jQuery?
I guess I am just looking for a reason to use jQuery vs. Prototype and
an argument about why I don't need all those (useful?) methods
available in prototype? Anyone?
This going will make me sound really dumb but what is the difference between
using single quote versus double quotes in jQuery, e.g.
$('#spincursor').click(function() {
$("#spinner").show();
});
Or
$("#spincursor").click(function()
Hey,
Can you contact me off-list. It seems like you're working on something along
the lines of something I'm also working on. Perhaps we can discuss our
common findings?
-- Yehuda
On 4/8/07, Ariel Jakobovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just want to express that tonight I gave extjs a seriou
I just want to express that tonight I gave extjs a serious attempt, struggled,
switched to jQuery plugin alternatives, and succeeded very quickly.
I am developing my own framework to manage the addition of modules into a
larger "application", with my own objects for retrieving data by AJAX, and
33 matches
Mail list logo
