[jQuery] Re: Another speed test

2007-07-11 Thread Glen Lipka
oops, fixed. Also, I fixed a mistake in the template. I was including 2 heads/body tags. If anyone has a page they wanted to test, I can make it live. Send me 1. Source of the page without any JS. (Css paths should be absolute) 2. A list of selectors you want to test. Should be specific to yo

[jQuery] Re: Another speed test

2007-07-11 Thread Rey Bango
Glen, you have a typo in the test. It should be jQuery v1.1.3.1! ;) Glen Lipka wrote: Actually, I am putting my money where my mouth is: http://www.commadot.com/jquery/speedtest/ This shows library SIZE and it also uses an actual website. (My blog, which is typical of normal WordPress blogs)

[jQuery] Re: Another speed test

2007-07-11 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Glen Lipka wrote: Actually, I am putting my money where my mouth is: http://www.commadot.com/jquery/speedtest/ This shows library SIZE and it also uses an actual website. (My blog, which is typical of normal WordPress blogs). I'm still playing with the selectors. not sure why some didnt fi

[jQuery] Re: Another speed test

2007-07-11 Thread Glen Lipka
Actually, I am putting my money where my mouth is: http://www.commadot.com/jquery/speedtest/ This shows library SIZE and it also uses an actual website. (My blog, which is typical of normal WordPress blogs). I'm still playing with the selectors. not sure why some didnt find anything. Glen On

[jQuery] Re: Another speed test

2007-07-11 Thread Rey Bango
Jack actually points out the fact that "div div div" is pointless. He also gives a lot of kudos to jQuery and I'm glad for that. He even mentioned John's nth child script and how well-written it is. I like the fact that he, in a roundabout way, calls out other libs on the use of pointless sel