On almost every list that I'm subscribed to this guy posted the same
message. Unless you have a use case, and are comparing the two with
regards to the use case (why one would be a better choice than the
other), a comparison such as yours only illustrates how much you have
to learn about CouchDB.
CouchDB is different then MySQL, you can't compare !
"Apache CouchDB is a distributed, fault-tolerant and schema-free
document-oriented database"
Mysql is a relationnal database management system
So i think there's no reason why one could be better than another.
But, i got some 10 really g
Also worth a read:
CouchDB Expectations
http://www.davispj.com/posts/10
"
The most important part of this entire post is the following statement: The
only time when CouchDB should be considered as a replacement for an RDBMS is
when an RDBMS was the wrong choice in the first place.
Just as CouchD
See also http://couchdb.apache.org/docs/intro.html
"
What CouchDB is
* A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API.
* Ad-hoc and schema-free with a flat address space.
* Distributed, featuring robust, incremental replication with
bi-directional conflict detection and manage
I think it's rather bold to say 'better' rather than just
'different.' It's unclear how a couchDB database would fare with
perhaps 50 million items stored in it, or if couchDB would be at all
suitable for answering queries such as 'how many salespeople reached
their quotas during the last quarter
5 matches
Mail list logo
