In firefox, to see the changed html markup click on the page and do
ctrl-A to select all and then right click and View Selection
Source. This also work if you just highlight the element you want to
see the source of.
On Feb 7, 10:05 pm, brian bally.z...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at
That should work fine. Example: http://jsbin.com/odada
Something else must be going wrong.
Karl Rudd
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM, gberz3 gbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Will someone please explain to me why the following code fails to
execute? I have a simple test page set up and jquery doesn't
There is nothing wrong with your jQuery code.
Double check the link to jQuery library and the HTML markup.
Try this example tested here:
style type=text/css media=all
.midget {background:red}
/style
script
src=http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.1/jquery.min.js;/script
script
Ok, this is odd. I can perform a .fadeOut() on the acquired divs, but
the .addClass() method specifically isn't working. Is there anything
in particular that I can check? Specific syntax? Anything?
Also, thanks for the quick support.
On Feb 7, 10:33 pm, Mauricio \(Maujor\) Samy Silva
Do you see the class added in firebug's HTML view?
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:49 PM, gberz3 gbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, this is odd. I can perform a .fadeOut() on the acquired divs, but
the .addClass() method specifically isn't working. Is there anything
in particular that I can check?
Alrighty. First and foremost color me embarrassed, but I wasn't aware
that the actual source wasn't manipulated. For instance, if I click
on the browsers' VIEW SOURCE, it maintains the original. However, if
I view the OBJECT via the CONSOLE of either Firebug, or view the HTML
via the CONSOLE
I believe that all browsers maintain the *original* source that they
receive. This used to bug the heck out of me until a) the FF
WebDeveloper extension came along with view rendered source and, b)
I realised that it's in everyone's best interest that the browser
inform you of the exact nature of
I'm just glad it only took 2 hours, and not 2 weeks. I always tend to
think outside the box. Unfortunately, I often find myself inside
another box just beside the original box. Are there any sorts of
explicit documentation that warns against gotchas of this nature?
Thanks for the hand-holding
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:37 AM, gberz3 gbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just glad it only took 2 hours, and not 2 weeks. I always tend to
think outside the box. Unfortunately, I often find myself inside
another box just beside the original box. Are there any sorts of
explicit documentation
9 matches
Mail list logo
