[jQuery] Re: what is wrong with this simple load data codes

2009-06-23 Thread Steven Yang
i am not sure whether getir.asp?Process=UPSWEIGHT=1PostalCode=90012Country=us equals to getir.asp?Process=UPSWEIGHT=1POSTALCODE=90012COUNTRY=us maybe check that

[jQuery] Re: what is wrong with this simple load data codes

2009-06-23 Thread efet
It does, but I tried it with uppercase, lowercase none worked. Page is giving me this error when first opened though Error: [Exception... Component is not available nsresult: 0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE) location: JS frame ::

[jQuery] Re: what is wrong with this simple load data codes

2009-06-23 Thread efet
Ok that fixed! They index.asp and getir.asp were in a folder so I had to add the folder name in the url section. Something like this: $.post(newfolder/getir.asp?Process=UPS On Jun 23, 2:55 pm, efet efetun...@gmail.com wrote: It does, but I tried it with uppercase, lowercase none worked. Page

[jQuery] Re: what is wrong with firefox :(

2009-06-16 Thread MadeOfRose
i am giving my answer to my question. The fireworks does not support focus event on table or div elements. ie7 does. That is way i get problem. Here is text code below. You can test it by clicking div and table elements. If it works you will get an alert (ie7 only) Fireworks and opera shows

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong ?

2009-01-16 Thread Giuliani Sanches
Fixed. :) The problem was with the way on how i build the unordered list (i'm using jinja2 templates) and some issues with css. Ty. On 15 jan, 20:09, Giuliani Sanches giulianisanc...@gmail.com wrote: I have the jquery working fine ( $(a).click to show an alert messages do the job) but i

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-15 Thread Tane Piper
Yes, it's current planned in 1.2 which should be out in less than a month. Ganesh has also working on his LavaLamp plugin that provides an animation stop to the menu. To be honest it's one of these things that probably should have been in before now, but people are only starting to see that's

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-14 Thread Ganeshji Marwaha
No problem karl I like being quoted ;-) But, the jkwick doesn't actually use the technique he needs. Instead it uses a boolean called running to determine if an animation is running or not and if it is running, then it doesn't trigger another animation until that has finished. Actually it is

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-13 Thread Joel Birch
On 8/14/07, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there anything wring with that code(i don't care about use mouseover() instead of bind() because i did to test things)? It seems to work fine for me, although I would use hover() in

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-13 Thread Eridius
That help quite a bit but still not the effect i am looking for. I know this is ironic but i am looking for the effect on this home page on the right hand side: http://mootools.net/ The thing that that effect has and this one does not is the is stops the effect once the mouse leaves if i move

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-13 Thread Joel Birch
On 8/14/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That help quite a bit but still not the effect i am looking for. I know this is ironic but i am looking for the effect on this home page on the right hand side: http://mootools.net/ The thing that that effect has and this one does not is the

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-13 Thread Joel Birch
On 8/14/07, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That help quite a bit but still not the effect i am looking for. I know this is ironic but i am looking for the effect on this home page on the right hand side: http://mootools.net/

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-13 Thread Karl Swedberg
On Aug 13, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Joel Birch wrote: On 8/14/07, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That help quite a bit but still not the effect i am looking for. I know this is ironic but i am looking for the effect on this home page on the

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code?

2007-08-13 Thread Eridius
That is pretty disappointing, that is a lot of code to stop an animation. i guess i need to rethink on mootools. Karl Swedberg-2 wrote: On Aug 13, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Joel Birch wrote: On 8/14/07, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/14/07, Eridius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code

2007-04-20 Thread joomlafreak
Thanks for the reply Brian, I tried your way but didn work. I looked at the docs again and it says it should be like this jQuery(item_content).filter(#contentpane .contentpane p, :first); But unfortunately this also did not work. As for th cloning of node, Well I am novice to javascript and

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code

2007-04-20 Thread Sean Catchpole
jQuery(item_content).filter(#contentpane .contentpane p, :first); Filter removes those items from your search. Perhaps you want to use find instead. Try the following code: jQuery.get(item_link,function(item_content){ var new_content =jQuery(#contentpane .contentpane

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code

2007-04-20 Thread joomlafreak
Thats what I am trying to do, filter our everything other then the first paragraph from the results I get through jQuery.get... I tried your code Sean but it too did not help. I am just wondering now what is the code if I want to select/extract first paragraph from the ajax get function and

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code

2007-04-20 Thread Sean Catchpole
Can you post some sample html that you're working with? It's a little hard to work blind. Filter would remove your search from the results, find would leave on your search in the results. apples oranges bananas filter oranges would leave: apples and bananas find oranges would leave: oranges

[jQuery] Re: What is wrong with this code

2007-04-20 Thread Sean Catchpole
You're absolutely right. I think at some point in jQuery's past this was flipped, but I'm glad to know that the filter functions works as intended now. Sorry for the confusion. =( ~Sean