I'd say it would be. While CF8 does have built-in JS, the code they've
offered is fairly bloated and a little excessive. It's good for people who
don't know how to write their own JS, but if you want client code that's
lean and mean, then use your own stuff.
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups
om [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: October 3, 2007 5:52 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ajaxCFC and CF8
Brook,
CF8 provides quite a number of options in terms of prebuilt Ajax
controls but I tend to refer to them as "intro" widgets. They don&
I'll chime in on this topic as well. The Javascript objects that are
available in CF8 are, as Rey said, simplistic and for people who need
a neat little widget in their application. I am still heavily reliant
upon ajaxCFC because I use the Ext library with the jQuery adapter.
For advanced AJAX d
O... wrappers around the jQuery UI components sounds cool. Gotta keep us
posted about that one! :o)
Chris
On 10/3/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Brook,
>
> CF8 provides quite a number of options in terms of prebuilt Ajax
> controls but I tend to refer to them as "intro" widget
Brook,
CF8 provides quite a number of options in terms of prebuilt Ajax
controls but I tend to refer to them as "intro" widgets. They don't
provide the level of functionality available in jQuery or many other
libs and do not adhere to any form of progressive enhancement. Also, few
users want
5 matches
Mail list logo
