Re: [jQuery] Re: Why jQuery is not working on my page ?

li#Story would be more efficient Sent from my iPhone On 5 Nov 2009, at 22:24, vmrao wrote: I just got rid of unnecessary '(function($){ ' and it worked. On Nov 5, 5:17 pm, vmrao wrote: Here is my code. I have included jQuery library. (function($){ $(document).ready(function(){

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery is not working on my page ?

I just got rid of unnecessary '(function($){ ' and it worked. On Nov 5, 5:17 pm, vmrao wrote: > Here is my code. I have included jQuery library. > > > (function($){ >         $(document).ready(function(){ > >                 $('ul.News li[id*="Story"]').each(function() { >                      

Re: [jQuery] Re: why jquery not work together ?

to me it looks like you have both mootools framework and jquery scripts, but no jquery frameworks main script linked in your project. Jerome - Original Message - From: mmc online To: jQuery (English) Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:07 AM Subject: [jQuery] Re: why jquery not

[jQuery] Re: why jquery not work together ?

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:06 AM, yashmistrey wrote: > Hello to All > > I have used different JavaScript on my website but only one script is > working. > > This is the link > http://makemycreative.in/30oct_09 > You will see these a button Name: Services = That is working > But under “service butt

[jQuery] Re: Why JQuery Autocomplete displays only one item?

I think you need to return data with line breaks after it: one two three internally the autocomplete plugin splits on the pipe. See this: http://grover.open2space.com/node/190 and this: http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Autocomplete/autocomplete#url_or_dataoptions "The result must return with

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

You can add jQuery to your Rails project like you could to any server technology. The reason people say rails and proto/script go together is in Rails you can write 'RJS' templates which is ruby code that gets compiled into proto/script javascript code, allowing you to add javascript effects to y

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

Zok, Quite a bit of work has been done in having jQuery and Rails work together. If you search the list archives, you can find out morw. Rey... zok wrote: Hey, thanks for your answers. Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible and has the simler code. Right? Th

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

ry-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: why jQuery? jQuery should work with ANY back end language, since it is a font end language. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:52 PM, zok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, thanks for your answers. Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

jQuery should work with ANY back end language, since it is a font end language. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:52 PM, zok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, > > thanks for your answers. > Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible > and has the simler code. Right? > > Thank

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

Hey, thanks for your answers. Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible and has the simler code. Right? Thanks zok On 3 Mrz., 05:02, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I think that only YOU can make that choice for yourself. Each > developer has their own tec

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

zok wrote on 3/2/2008 2:51 PM: what is going to have the best future: jQuery or Prototype (scriptaculous)? Maybe you can tell me a few differences and/or reasons for your joice... Maybe you can read the archives of the jQuery and Prototype lists, plenty of discussion on the topic:

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

As someone who finds javascript real difficult at times I have tried both sine prototype was all the rage at one time I found it really tricky and never got to flight with it. Later I tried jQuery I made a lot of progress very quickly I have been spurred on, still at times fumbling but I am able

[jQuery] Re: why jQuery?

First, I think that only YOU can make that choice for yourself. Each developer has their own techniques/styles. We can't make judgements to match your environment or habits :) Next, I think both have a future because they serve slightly different needs and audiences. (IMO). jQuery see

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

I wanted to clarify. "Mootools is large based off or Moo.fx(and prototype/jQuery)>" This is not entirely true. While moo.fx may be prototype based (the code requires prototype to function), MooTools doesn't have any ressemblences/connections to jQuery (or at least not apparent to me). The only f

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

>On 8/13/07, Eridius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well after using jQuery and then going back to Mootools i do find i like a > few thing about jQuery better. One thing i think jQuery does better is > going through the DOM and selecting whatever i want fast and easy. I also > like the .css()

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

You know it is always the simple thing that you never think of. Klaus Hartl wrote: > > > Eridius wrote: >> >> Well after using jQuery and then going back to Mootools i do find i like >> a >> few thing about jQuery better. One thing i think jQuery does better is >> going through the DOM and

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Eridius wrote: Well after using jQuery and then going back to Mootools i do find i like a few thing about jQuery better. One thing i think jQuery does better is going through the DOM and selecting whatever i want fast and easy. I also like the .css() function because in mootools i would have

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Well after using jQuery and then going back to Mootools i do find i like a few thing about jQuery better. One thing i think jQuery does better is going through the DOM and selecting whatever i want fast and easy. I also like the .css() function because in mootools i would have to create a fx.St

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Ah...I gotcha. You're probably right, I was most likely mixing up my libraries. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eridius Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 8:42 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Why jQuery

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Well this is true and not true. Mootools is based on Moo.fx which might have been around much longer than jQuery but Mootools i believe was released a few months after jQuery. Mootools is largely based off or Moo.fx(and prototype/jQuery) Andy Matthews-4 wrote: > > > Actually, I believe that

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Actually, I believe that Moo Tools has been around for quite a bit longer than jQuery. It was one of the first effects libraries I looked at before I ever even heard of jQuery. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eridius Sent: Saturd

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

I just wanted to post my reply from your other thread, not sure if you saw it: To write a class how you like, you could do it like this: function ajax_request(options){ // initialize this.setOptions( options ); } ajax_request.prototype = { // members and properties setOptions: function(opti

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

http://www.apex-wowguild.com/dev/javascript/ajax.js This is a example. I can create a object and then modify it based on the user interaction. If i can not store this as an object i would need to write code to create each different option the user can do instead of just modifying this one obje

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Trying to reply with the code i cut out to see if it works, the code is in order 1 => $().click(function(){}); 2 => $().addEvent('click', function(){}); 3 => var ajax_request = function(options) { ajax_options = { test: 'test' }; test = function() { a

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Benjamin, Think google maps... It is a nice class, which can be instantiated and setup any number of times within the same page... So, in this case class offers a convenient blueprint for further instantiation. Hope that clarifies a bit. -GTG On 8/11/07, Benjamin Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

[jQuery] Re: Why jQuery over Mootools

Eridius, If you do a search in the group ( http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/search?group=jquery-en&q=mootools&qt_g=Search+this+group) you will see a few comparisons between both. I think ultimately it comes down to preference. As for the class thing you talk about, can you give an example