get ahold of the Sun JSP source code and add this method, according to the
Sun Community Source License.
Thanks,
Brad Neuberg
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message &
I also am VERY interested in this.
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Wine Vaughn wrote:
> I want to call another JSP (b.jsp) from my original JSP (a.jsp). (I'm using
> JRun 2.3 with IIS on NT 4.0.)
>
> I can accomplish exactly what I want with the JRun's proprietary method
> CallPage, but I would rather use
What is a scriptlet?
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Kirkdorffer, Daniel wrote:
>
>
> This reminds me, I've never liked this new syntax for the DISPLAY tag
>
>
>
> What I don't like is the use of colons (:) rather than periods (.). The
> spec says it "helps distinguish this naming convention from Java syntax." I
> don't see
> (I see EJB as even more related to JSP - JSP and EJB makes a nice pair in
> designing industrial strength applications)
This is a really interesting statement; can you elaborate on it?
Also, is anyone interested in combining the EJBBoss organizations EJB
implementation with the GNU JSP librar
I have to heavily agree with this message. My company is designing an
application which __really__ needs processRequest() so that one JSP page
can use another one.
On Wed, 5 May 1999, John Langley wrote:
> and a 'use case' in the form of "guarded pages"
> a.k.a. required login.
>
> I noticed in
Should we forward all of these processReuqest() affirmative votes to the
JSP team, or are they getting these emails already?
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Beheshti, Reza wrote:
> I, too, completely agree with John and others, here; and vote for the
> reinstatement of processRequest() as it currently stand
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Mark A. Kolb wrote:
> I just wanted to second these remarks. JSP is all about separation of
> programming logic from presentation. The ability to use one syntax for
> programming (i.e., Java) and another syntax for presentation (i.e., HTML
> and HTML-like tags) makes this sepa
i would love someone to do a comparison of WebMacro Vs. JSP Vs. Enhydra's
XMLC
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Justin Wells wrote:
> In the meantime there are other tools, such as WebMacro, which you
> could use to give non-programmers access to your objects.
>
>http://webmacro.org
>
> Justin
>
> Quotin
On Mon, 10 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I think this is the final argument that wins many of the problems people
> > have posted here. There has been a thread concerning whether to provide
> > thread-safe abilities into the servlet engine for sessioning; I think we
> > should, espec
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Drew Cox wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> Your comment below is interesting.
>
> >We dont actually believe that "model 2" is the preferred model
> >for JSP usage, JSP's *do not* typically require Servlet
> "masters"
> >in order to create applications. Servle
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Tommy Berglund wrote:
> I've got a problem and it would really help if someone could answer it.
> The problem is that I want to call a method in my bean when an event is
> triggered in my .jsp document. The code looks something like this...
>
>
This isn't part of the spec,
This is a VERY good idea.,
-Original Message-
From: Lastname Firstname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 11:24 AM
Subject: Newbie questions
>Is there a possibility of making two seperate lists?
>
>1) Discussion of JSP architectur
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brad Neuberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: calling bean-methods...
>Brad Neuberg wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12
9 2:17 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: calling bean-methods...
>>
>> <>
>> Brad Neuberg wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 12 May 1999, Tommy Berglund wrote:
>> >
>> > > I've got a problem and it would really help if
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Brad Neuberg wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Brad Neuberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
Is anyone interested in putting together an ExoLab session to finish
GNUJSP and bring it up to the 1.0 spec? ExoLab is a forum for group
interaction on open-source projects. It is at www.exolab.org.
===
To unsubscribe, send
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Bill O'Keefe wrote:
> At 12:36 AM 6/17/99 -0400, Brad Neuberg wrote:
> >On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Bill O'Keefe wrote:
> >
> >> Chris,
> >>
> >> >> I have a question on using beans from JSP. According to
> >> &
18 matches
Mail list logo
