SJSP 1.1 anybody using it?

1999-09-22 Thread Mike Roark
Hi all, Is anybody actively using the SJSP 1.1 implementation? I'm getting ready to prototype a design of a new architecture for my company's web site. I'd like to use the custom tag feature of JSP 1.1, and this seems to be the only currently available implementation of the JSP 1.1 spec. I

Re: SJSP 1.1 anybody using it?

1999-09-23 Thread Karl Avedal
Hey Mike, > Hi all, > Is anybody actively using the SJSP 1.1 implementation? I'm getting > ready to prototype a design of a new architecture for my company's web > site. I'd like to use the custom tag feature of JSP 1.1, and this seems > to be the only currently available implementation o

Re: SJSP 1.1 anybody using it?

1999-09-23 Thread Stepan Schejbal
> Hey Mike, > > > Hi all, > > Is anybody actively using the SJSP 1.1 implementation? I'm getting > > ready to prototype a design of a new architecture for my company's web > > site. I'd like to use the custom tag feature of JSP 1.1, and this seems > > to be the only currently available imp

Re: SJSP 1.1 anybody using it?

1999-09-23 Thread Karl Avedal
Hey Stepan, > > I have yet to actually try SJSP 1.1 but note that it doesn't provide a servlet > > engine, but works together with other. The problem is that since JSP 1.1 is using > > the Servlet 2.2 API as the foundation for its semantics you would want to use a > > Servlet 2.2 compliant engine

Re: SJSP 1.1 anybody using it?

1999-09-25 Thread Stepan Schejbal
> If you have implemented all JSP 1.1 features to work with 2.0 Servlet engines, how >are > you handling concepts that are introduced in JSP 1.1/Servlet 2.2, like >web-applications > (with web-application archives) and response buffers? Web application are web server (servlet engine) related. I