On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:15 AM Curtis Hovey-Canonical
wrote:
> A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc3, is here!
>
>
> ## What's new?
>
> * For an AWS VPC account juju will create a t2.medium for controller
> instances by default now. Non-controller instances are
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:15 AM Curtis Hovey-Canonical
wrote:
> A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc3, is here!
>
>
> ## What's new?
>
> * For an AWS VPC account juju will create a t2.medium for controller
> instances by default now. Non-controller instances are
Nice! One question though maybe I'm missing something but I didn't see
where the conjure-up instructions were shown on the jujucharms.com page?
https://jujucharms.com/canonical-kubernetes/ It is in the README though
@mbruzek and I worked on the Canonical Distribution of Kubernetes this
week. There are still quite a few work items in flight, but let’s focus on
what made the early release today:
Kubernetes Master
-
Normalized the end user messaging displayed during cluster operations
(full stops,
On 06/10/16 16:14, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM Rick Harding
> > wrote:
>
> Thanks Andrew, this is great to hear. Can I bug you about details
> as to how it works? Does this introduce their pricing API
A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc3, is here!
## What's new?
* For an AWS VPC account juju will create a t2.medium for controller
instances by default now. Non-controller instances are unchanged for
now, and remain m3.medium by default. Controller instance root disk
now defaults to
Hi Daniel, if the HP servers have iLO, they are often able to use the IPMI
power setting with IPMI_2_0.
I've seen some older versions of iLO seem to require using the "HP Moonshot
iLO4 (IPMI)" power setting. But after updating those same servers to the
latest version of iLO, the normal IPMI power
Patrik Karisch wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> one thing which mocks my head, when evaluating Juju is, the state is only
> in the controller which gets deployed with commands. Which means I have
> IMHO no docs/history of how my current state of machines and charms was
> constructed?
>
> As a side note:
I forgot the cross-post to maas-devel until after I sent this one and
sent it there also.
I have some older servers in my test cluster that will only do
wakeonlan and not ipmi. I was told that wakeonlan was no longer
available in maas 2.0 and was trying to keep my test cluster on the
same
'scuse the cross-post but I think you'll get a faster answer from
maas-devel. I'll start by asking if you've tried MAAS 2.0?
Mark
On 06/10/16 08:18, Daniel Bidwell wrote:
> I have a maas-1.9.4 with servers with 4 2T disks for data storage and a
> 120GB disk on an onboard controller for the
I have a maas-1.9.4 with servers with 4 2T disks for data storage and a
120GB disk on an onboard controller for the system disk. Maas is
deploying ubuntu 16.04 on the servers. Ubuntu 16.04 labels the 120GB
system disk as /dev/sde, not /dev/sda. In maas I can define the
/sdev/sde disk as the
Thanks Andrew, this is great to hear. Can I bug you about details as to how
it works? Does this introduce their pricing API as a blocker to deploying
with Juju? If they introduce a change to the API we miss or their API goes
down is there any sort of cache of the info that users can continue with
Hi Patrik
Welcome to the Juju community, and thanks for the great question!
I see the bundle as a way to "save" the state of a model you constructed. A
bundle specifies a bunch of charms, their versions, their relations, and
their config values. You can find more info on bundles here:
Hi folks,
Just a heads up to let you know about some changes made to the ec2
provider, which will show up in Juju 2.0.
We are now pulling down the Price List API (
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/awsaccountbilling/latest/aboutv2/price-changes.html)
and using that to determine which instance types to
Hi there,
one thing which mocks my head, when evaluating Juju is, the state is only
in the controller which gets deployed with commands. Which means I have
IMHO no docs/history of how my current state of machines and charms was
constructed?
As a side note: I'm used to Ansible and Puppet, which
15 matches
Mail list logo