You are my new personal hero
On Thursday, 25 February 2016, Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Occasionally I'll change a test, and some string equality test will fail
> with a wall of text. Sometimes we shouldn't be checking the whole string,
> but sometimes it's legitimate to do so, and it can
Nice. FWIW I have a related tool that tries to help find where a regexp
mismatch has happened. It parses the output of gocheck, so it's
probably not that useful to non-acme users but you might want
to consider including the approach (http://paste.ubuntu.com/15195795/)
for fancycheck.Matches and Err
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:23 PM roger peppe wrote:
> Nice. FWIW I have a related tool that tries to help find where a regexp
> mismatch has happened. It parses the output of gocheck, so it's
> probably not that useful to non-acme users but you might want
> to consider including the approach (http
Using Juju 1.25.3 on trusty, I ran into a problem destroying an old
environment.
ERROR environment destruction failed: destroying storage: destroying
volumes: detaching volume- from machine-: Unable to detach root volume
'vol-...' from instance 'i-' (IncorrectState).
Is Juju trying to treat t
I agree with Horacio, you're my hero, Andrew.
I was actually just looking at sergi's diffmatchpatch implementation for
exactly this purpose a couple days ago. Thanks for doing that!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:09 AM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:23 PM roger peppe wrote:
>
>>
So I have a patch up http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/3973
Which with the help from Tycho does look like it allows you to "juju
bootstrap lxd lxd" again, but there are a fair number of caveats.
The big one is that it is only compatible with lxd-2.0.0~beta4 (because the
API has changed since beta3 and v
I took a quick look through it as I was OCR - comments in RB.
On 25 February 2016 at 15:00, John Meinel wrote:
> So I have a patch up http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/3973
>
> Which with the help from Tycho does look like it allows you to "juju
> bootstrap lxd lxd" again, but there are a fair number o
be aware though, iirc that ppa replaces your go version with 1.6 (or used
to) which can mess your env if you are using go from ubuntu.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Andrew McDermott <
andrew.mcderm...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I took a quick look through it as I was OCR - comments in RB.
>
> On
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Occasionally I'll change a test, and some string equality test will fail
> with a wall of text. Sometimes we shouldn't be checking the whole string,
> but sometimes it's legitimate to do so, and it can be difficult/tedious to
> s
On 26 February 2016 at 04:59, Horacio Duran
wrote:
> be aware though, iirc that ppa replaces your go version with 1.6 (or used
> to) which can mess your env if you are using go from ubuntu.
>
With a bit of apt configuration you can use the lxd stable PPA without
pulling in its Go 1.6 packages.
FWIW, go 1.6 works just fine with Juju on my system
On 26/02/16 08:34, Menno Smits wrote:
> On 26 February 2016 at 04:59, Horacio Duran
> wrote:
>
>> be aware though, iirc that ppa replaces your go version with 1.6 (or used
>> to) which can mess your env if you are using go from ubuntu.
>>
>
>
When will this PR make it into the lxd-container-type feature branch so we
can start testing this?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
> FWIW, go 1.6 works just fine with Juju on my system
>
> On 26/02/16 08:34, Menno Smits wrote:
> > On 26 February 2016 at 04:59, Horacio Duran >
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:04 AM Eric Snow wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Andrew Wilkins
> wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Occasionally I'll change a test, and some string equality test will fail
> > with a wall of text. Sometimes we shouldn't be checking the whole string,
> > but sometime
As soon as possible. The branch is under review now. The PR says there are still
some tests to fix.
On 26/02/16 09:03, Adam Stokes wrote:
> When will this PR make it into the lxd-container-type feature branch so we
> can start testing this?
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
>
I also left a review. Mostly LGTM. I just wanted a bit of feedback
before giving it a ship-it. :)
-eric
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Andrew McDermott
wrote:
> I took a quick look through it as I was OCR - comments in RB.
>
> On 25 February 2016 at 15:00, John Meinel wrote:
>>
>> So I hav
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM John Meinel wrote:
> Using Juju 1.25.3 on trusty, I ran into a problem destroying an old
> environment.
>
> ERROR environment destruction failed: destroying storage: destroying
> volumes: detaching volume- from machine-: Unable to detach root volume
> 'vol-...' fro
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:53 PM John Meinel
> wrote:
>
>> Using Juju 1.25.3 on trusty, I ran into a problem destroying an old
>> environment.
>>
>> ERROR environment destruction failed: destroying storage: destroying
>> volumes: detaching v
On 26 February 2016 at 11:41, Ian Booth wrote:
> FWIW, go 1.6 works just fine with Juju on my system
>
My reason for not using Go 1.6 on my machine is that it's not what the
official Juju releases are built with (yet) and it's not what CI uses.
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
A fair point. But I'll note that we are trying to get go >= 1.5 into trusty
back ports and use that for Juju 2.0
We need something better than 1.2 that is in Trusty to build the lxd
bindings at all, and we've wanted to move forward to not have to fight with
all the dependencies that have already mo
On 26 February 2016 at 16:35, John Meinel wrote:
> A fair point. But I'll note that we are trying to get go >= 1.5 into
> trusty back ports and use that for Juju 2.0
> We need something better than 1.2 that is in Trusty to build the lxd
> bindings at all, and we've wanted to move forward to not h
>
>> I personally encourage us to use heterogeneous versions of go as much as
>> we can. Because we should be compatible as much as possible. But it does
>> look like our dependencies are going to force our hand.
>>
>
> Agreed. I think it's healthy for Juju's devs to be using a range of Go
> vers
21 matches
Mail list logo
