If anyone knows how to fix ConjugatePriors, I'm all ears. I have a PR to
update the dependencies but I quickly realized that getting it to work
requires more than bumping versions, and I haven't been able to pinpoint
exactly what needs to change.
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:44:51 PM UTC
That worked!
I now have Distributions 0.10.2
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:40:22 PM UTC-7, Fengyang Wang wrote:
>
> I think the problem is that ConjugatePriors is holding PDMats back, while
> Distributions wants to move it forward. Try removing it and see if
> Distributions will update.
>
I noticed that in Distributions from 0.9 onward the Normal and MvNormal
distributions were parameterised on Real (similar to what I did for
PDMats). That work should have made my test fix in that pull request
obsolote. In other words, if ConjugatePriors was/is updated to work with
Distributions
FengYang is right. Remove ConjugatePriors. That package needs a new tag
that's compatible with the latest versions of its dependencies, otherwise
having it installed is going to cause issues like this.
I'm not sure what's needed beyond
https://github.com/JuliaStats/ConjugatePriors.jl/pull/10
Did you post your full Pkg.status() yet? Is something keeping you stuck on
StatsFuns 0.2.x? The only new upper bound I see in the METADATA versions is
from https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl/pull/5613
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:09:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>
> Okay, here is
I think the problem is that ConjugatePriors is holding PDMats back, while
Distributions wants to move it forward. Try removing it and see if
Distributions will update.
Okay, here is the same thing but from my METADATA.
Code:
metadata_dir = "/home/tim/.julia/v0.4/METADATA"
for (pkg, version) in Pkg.installed()
reqfile = joinpath(metadata_dir, pkg, "versions", string(version),
"requires")
if isfile(reqfile)
lines = open(readlines, reqfile)
0.5.0-pre is actually strictly greater than 0.5.0-dev. Packages currently can't
have extra build information like that unless you tag non-semver releases in
metadata. They're either at a tag, between tags, or at more recent point than
the latest tag. I think a format that has more annotations in
Thank you. I should have RTFM.
The file is not from METADATA. I can check that.
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:17:28 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> I hate to have to say "RTFM" about this so often, but see
> http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/strings/#version-number-literals.
El martes, 6 de septiembre de 2016, 14:17:28 (UTC-4), Tony Kelman escribió:
>
> I hate to have to say "RTFM" about this so often, but see
> http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/strings/#version-number-literals.
>
> The trailing dash means including prereleases of the given version.
I hate to have to say "RTFM" about this so often, but see
http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/strings/#version-number-literals.
The trailing dash means including prereleases of the given version.
(Considering how unintuitive this is we should probably transition to
something cleare
-users
Subject: [julia-users] Re: Pkg.update() does not pull latest version?
Ok, will do!
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:31:25 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
There's a bug somewhere with that error message, I've seen it points at the
wrong package. If we can come up with a re
I wrote the script and put the output in the attached file.
I assume that the '-' at the end of a dep is an upperbound?
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:35:46 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>
> Ok, will do!
>
> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:31:25 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> There's a
Ok, will do!
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:31:25 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote:
>
> There's a bug somewhere with that error message, I've seen it points at
> the wrong package. If we can come up with a reproducible test case here
> it'll help for fixing the bug and making that message more us
There's a bug somewhere with that error message, I've seen it points at the
wrong package. If we can come up with a reproducible test case here it'll
help for fixing the bug and making that message more useful.
It's almost certainly not Compat (I don't think anyone has ever added an
upper bound
The upper bound was done in METADATA do avoid Distributions 0.10 breaking
GaussianMixtures, see
https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl/pull/5634#issuecomment-233810018.
However GaussianMixtures 0.1.0 was released
https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl/pull/5790 which should support
Distrib
Okay - I removed GaussianMixtures and now it is complaining about Compat.
ERROR: unsatisfiable package requirements detected: no feasible version
could be found for package: Compat
I wrote a script to run through all package REQUIRE files and print out the
Compat line, if any. None of these fo
Maybe one of its dependencies has a maximum version requirement?
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:38:01 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote:
>
> Okay, this is a little weird.
>
> If I run the following it looks like the culprit is a dirty package:
>
> julia> Pkg.checkout("Distributions")
> INFO: Checkin
Okay, this is a little weird.
If I run the following it looks like the culprit is a dirty package:
julia> Pkg.checkout("Distributions")
INFO: Checking out Distributions master...
INFO: Pulling Distributions latest master...
WARNING: Distributions is fixed at 0.10.1+ conflicting with requirement f
19 matches
Mail list logo
