There are some interesting numbers
at https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/graphs/traffic
Elliot Saba also did some scraping of the AWS download logs for binaries
and shared the aggregate numbers (broken down by platform) privately with a
few people, it may be worth sharing those publicly.
On W
I don't think the /graphs folder is part of the julia repo any-more :(
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Tony Kelman wrote:
> There are some interesting numbers at
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/graphs/traffic
>
> Elliot Saba also did some scraping of the AWS download logs for binaries
> and
It's not in the repo, it's a GitHub feature. But it may only be visible if
you have Collaborator or Owner status on the repository.
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 10:51:34 AM UTC-6, Ben Ward wrote:
>
> I don't think the /graphs folder is part of the julia repo any-more :(
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 20
These graphs are not available for people who are not (Github)
collaborator for the julia repository.
Tony Kelman a écrit :
There are some interesting numbers
at https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/graphs/traffic
Elliot Saba also did some scraping of the AWS download logs for
binaries and sha
Could anyone who can see it tell me the current figures? Or see to making
this data public? It seems an odd thing to keep private - I would presume
growth figures were something to show off.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Luthaf wrote:
> These graphs are not available for people who are not (Gi
Le mercredi 04 novembre 2015 à 20:49 +, Ben Ward a écrit :
> Could anyone who can see it tell me the current figures? Or see to
> making this data public? It seems an odd thing to keep private - I
> would presume growth figures were something to show off.
Unfortunately, the graphs only cover ab
Some more data, from pkg.julialang.org web analytics:
In January there were 3.5k "users", which ramped up to 5k by March, and
then held there roughly before spiking up to nearly 6k in October - maybe
the 0.4 release?
Theres also the number of packages themselves:
300 packages ~ April 2014
400 p
Here's a nice comparison of languages used in github repo's and Julia is
#43 out of 50:
http://githut.info/
On Thursday, 5 November 2015 02:50:43 UTC+1, Iain Dunning wrote:
>
> Some more data, from pkg.julialang.org web analytics:
> In January there were 3.5k "users", which ramped up to 5k by Ma
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!aboutgroup/julia-users has one year of
data.
On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 6:10:41 PM UTC-5, Ken B wrote:
>
> Here's a nice comparison of languages used in github repo's and Julia is
> #43 out of 50:
> http://githut.info/
>
> On Thursday, 5 November 2015 02:50:
If I'm reading the graphs correctly, the underlying data is a year old.
On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 3:10:41 PM UTC-8, Ken B wrote:
>
> Here's a nice comparison of languages used in github repo's and Julia is
> #43 out of 50:
> http://githut.info/
>
> On Thursday, 5 November 2015 02:50:43 UTC+1
Attching the github traffic data. Doesn't have history though, but the
numbers were bigger than what I expected when I first saw this.
Some other interesting numbers:
1. ~10,000 pageviews on the website daily
2. 1.7M "users" and 8.6M pageviews over the lifetime of julialang.org - as
per goo
Thanks, for the responses everyone, it was incredibly helpful! :)
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 9:21:33 AM UTC, Viral Shah wrote:
>
> Attching the github traffic data. Doesn't have history though, but the
> numbers were bigger than what I expected when I first saw this.
>
>
> Some other inter
12 matches
Mail list logo
