[JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread Ugo Taddei
Hello everyone, I'll be reporting on OpenJUMP and derivates at the FOSSGIS 2007 Conference next month in Berlin: http://www.fossgis.de/wiki/index.php/Main_Page (German, only sorry :-( I'm taking the freedom to speak in name of this group and I'll be happy to include and mention any JUMP/OpenJU

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread erwan bocher
Hi Ugo, How are u ? The french connection is come back. We started a document to list some openjump improvements. I don't if I have already informed you. The doc is available on google doc. Do u have a gmail account ? R1. On 2/27/07, Ugo Taddei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello everyone,

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread Larry Becker
Hi Ugo, You didn't mention Kosmo. I have just started looking at Kosmo's code and it is incredible. There are 1437 Java files in Kosmo compared to 948 in OpenJump, 897 in SkyJUMP, and 775 in JUMP. Besides the new data sources, the most exciting potential seems to be in their renderer (which I

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei guys, > Besides > the new data sources, the most exciting potential seems to be in their > renderer (which I have not tested yet.) i actually wondered what is the advance of heaving separate renderers for points, lines and polygons??? can somebody explain this? btw: if we would have a tea

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread Larry Becker
I can't explain it, but I can benchmark it. For the burlulc.shp redraw render speed benchmark (not counting time to load shape file): No color theming. uDig: 3 seconds. Kosmo: 5 seconds. gvSIG: 9 seconds. OpenJump, SkyJUMP: 13 seconds. with color theming on LUCODE uDig: 6 seconds. Kosm

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Larry, You make some interesting comments about Kosmo. We definitely need to see what we can do to work more closely with their team of developers. I haven't forgotten what I said previously about encouraging more collaborative development, and I hope to be doing some work in this area of the co

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread David Zwiers
:18 PM To: List for discussion of JPP development and use. Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin I can't explain it, but I can benchmark it. For the burlulc.shp redraw render speed benchmark (not counting time to load shape file): No color theming. uDig: 3 seconds. Kos

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-27 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Sent: February 27, 2007 4:18 PM To: List for discussion of JPP development and use. Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin I can't explain it, but I can benchmark it. For the burlulc.shp redraw render speed benchmark (not counting time to load shape file): No color theming

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-28 Thread Ugo Taddei
Hi Larry, I got a mesg from someone from their team and will include them in the list. Larry Becker wrote: > Hi Ugo, > > You didn't mention Kosmo. I have just started looking at Kosmo's > code and it is incredible. There are 1437 Java files in Kosmo > compared to 948 in OpenJump, 897 in SkyJ