[j-nsp] J-Series CF Upgrade

2007-09-20 Thread Jared Mauch
I wanted to make a note for those of you that may find this of value. The easiest way I've found to upgrade the CF in the J-Series is to use a USB -> CF adapter and snapshot to that then swap it out. This is much easier than trying to use a bootable USB drive, and one step fewer to do.

[j-nsp] Netscreen security Manager 2007.1r3 on Ubuntu 7.04

2007-09-20 Thread Jose Valdivia
I'm trying to run the NSM, it's run on Red Hat fine, but I want it on my Ubuntu 7.04. I copy the files from my vmware red hat instalation. NetScreen-Security Manager folder. If I try to run ./NSM, I got: nawk: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No su

[j-nsp] MSS in NS5200 Firewall

2007-09-20 Thread Mostafa Abdel Wahed
Hello We have in our network NS5200 firewall And I have a few important questions regarding the MSS (max.segment size) First of all: What is the default setting of the MSS in the Box??? & is the MTU is still as default 1518 or what??? 2: Is the following command "set flow tcp-mss" used in the VPN

Re: [j-nsp] Per packet load balancing

2007-09-20 Thread Leigh Porter
On a similar note, does anybody know if Junipers will be any good at load balancing multiple GRE tunnels between two devices? -- Leigh David Ball wrote: > The following URL may help to explain: > > http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Load_Balancing > > as would the official JUNOS doc on

Re: [j-nsp] Per packet load balancing

2007-09-20 Thread David Ball
The following URL may help to explain: http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Load_Balancing as would the official JUNOS doc on the matter: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos84/swconfig84-routing/id-10480125.html As for workarounds, sounds like getting the Internet Proces

Re: [j-nsp] Per packet load balancing

2007-09-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday 20 September 2007 17:18, Nick Kraal wrote: > Dear all, Hello. > As I understand it, Juniper routers do not support per > packet load balancing on multiple interfaces similar to > Cisco, and only in a per flow fashion. > > Is there is any workaround for this? AFAIK, load balancing on

Re: [j-nsp] ECMP on ERX

2007-09-20 Thread Guy Davies
Hi Sven, While the balance is generally good, it's important to realise two things. 1. The balance will not be equal, it will approximate to equal. 2. Tthere are always ways of create a particular traffic profile that can skew the hash and result in traffic that is significantly unbalanced. Thi

Re: [j-nsp] ECMP on ERX

2007-09-20 Thread Nitin Vig
Hi Sven, Yes that is correct. More info: http://www.juniper.net/kb/viewka.jsp?txtKANumber=18702 http://www.juniper.net/kb/viewka.jsp?txtKANumber=27531 - Nitin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sven Juergensen (KielNET) Sent: Thursday, Septe

[j-nsp] Per packet load balancing

2007-09-20 Thread Nick Kraal
Dear all, As I understand it, Juniper routers do not support per packet load balancing on multiple interfaces similar to Cisco, and only in a per flow fashion. Is there is any workaround for this? Regards, -nick/ ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper