[j-nsp] 'JUNOS' under VM Ware

Hi all, does some one have the complete procedure to install 'JUNOS' under VM Ware : Requirements , prcedure ,packages , . If Anybody knows plzz Let me know BR/ khalid ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] 'JUNOS' under VM Ware

Hi, Let read this webpage http://www.packetmischief.ca/juniper/olive/index.html. At the end yo can see another link with more information Ivan 2007/12/4, Ibariouen Khalid [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, does some one have the complete procedure to install 'JUNOS' under VM Ware :

[j-nsp] An Olive Question

Hi everybody One quick question about Olive, does it support Cflow? Thanks in advance Ivan ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] OSPFv3 interoperability with another vendor

Hi, I'm testing OSPFv3 with another vendor and unable to get it UP, the session is stuck in ExStart. (no MTU mismatch) On another vendor router I see following error : %OSPF3-7-NBR: OSPF3-1: 192.168.1.4 EVENT: Sequence Mismatch STATE:* %OSPF3-7-PKT_ERRORS: OSPF3-1 STATE: Exchange NBR

Re: [j-nsp] An Olive Question

I believe that it is called as NetFlow in JUNOS, and if you are talking about NetFlow export, it doesn't require any AS-PIC or anything. But it only allow one export destination host. Hyun Hyunseog Ryu Senior Network Engineer Norlight , Inc. as a part of Q-Comm Company Applications

Re: [j-nsp] OSPFv3 interoperability with another vendor

H... it appears from the trace output that both routers are indicating that they are the master. Can you provide the config for the neighboring router? Stefan Fouant On 12/4/07, Jeff Tantsura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm testing OSPFv3 with another vendor and unable to get it UP,

Re: [j-nsp] An Olive Question

Jared, Thanks for the clarification. Since Olive has no PFE, I'm assuming this means he would be unable to perform this function? Stefan Fouant On 12/4/07, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:48:12AM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote: CFlowD requires the use of either

Re: [j-nsp] An Olive Question

The feature set is called J-Flow accounting in JUNOS, and the records they produce currently are dependant on the code version. I believe it is CFlowD records (prior to JUNOS 8.3), and Netflow v9 records in JUNOS 8.3 and above (since Netflow v9 has now been submitted to the IETF). Stefan Fouant

Re: [j-nsp] OSPFv3 interoperability with another vendor

Hi, As I mentioned before - second router is not a Juniper and also has a really basic ospf3 config. The funny thing is that both routers work just fine with cisco :-) We have tried restart routing/reload/diff junos - nothing worked Could you please provide more info? Thanks in

Re: [j-nsp] OSPFv3 interoperability with another vendor

Hi Paul, Thanks a lot, will give it a try. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: Paul Goyette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 4 december 2007 18:19 To: Stefan Fouant; Jeff Tantsura Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] OSPFv3 interoperability with another

Re: [j-nsp] Multicast over VPLS

Hi Ibrahim, Could you tell me if that solved the problem of using same link twice or more for same flow, when PE1 to PEy goes over same link than PE1 to PEx and both PEx and PEy has multicast users? tks, Alaerte On 12/2/07, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe it's

Re: [j-nsp] Multicast over VPLS

Alaerte, At the moment there's no telling whether the bandwidth savings are that significant compared to ingress replication method given our multicast application (IPTV) is currently only on limited deployment. Theoritically using the P2MP LSPs with BGP-VPLS P-Tunnel attribute, it should not

[j-nsp] OSPF Sham link question

I've read what docs I can find regarding Sham links for OSPF, but am still not seeing what I feel are the expected results. Here's my topology: cisco2651---T640---T640---M10 (GigE to M10 and Cisco, 10Gig btwn T640s) The network between the T640s uses RSVP-signalled LSPs for transport, and

Re: [j-nsp] An Olive Question

I never claimed they were different, I was only pointing out that the support is different depending on the code.. CFlowD is very much akin to Netflow v5 or Netflow v8 because CFlowD will not allow you to capture L7 information as Netflow v9 support would. On 12/4/07, Richard A Steenbergen

[j-nsp] Radius

Hello all i want to monitor on a E 320 the packets or bandwidth from subscribers and send it to radius. i think its something to do with radius interim or i maybe wrong or radius accounting, anyway if anyone have any ideas it would really help me.