[j-nsp] IP Demux interface

Hi - Does anyone know what exactly are those IP Demux interfaces in Junos? The documentation says that they are logical IP interfaces mapped into logical L2 interfaces. What does that exactly mean? If I have a logical interface 'Int1' unit 100 vlan 1 ip address 10.0.0.0/24and then a demux interfa

[j-nsp] AUTO: Don Alcantara is out of the office. (returning 11/04/2008)

I am out of the office until 11/04/2008. I will have limited access to my email. For urgent messages, you may contact our sales managers, Mr. Francis Baybay or Mr. Joel Gomicua. For technical services concern, you may email Ms. Carol Bernales at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Francis Baybay mobile: +6391

Re: [j-nsp] JUNIPER M120 IS NOT SYNC WITH CISCO ACS

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:13 PM, shariq qamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi , > > i trying to access my juniper router via Tacacs user id , but it is not > happening . > its is giving me error > LOGIN_PAM_AUTHENTICATION_ERROR: PAM authentication . > please sugest me the correct configuration way

[j-nsp] JUNIPER M120 IS NOT SYNC WITH CISCO ACS

Hi , i trying to access my juniper router via Tacacs user id , but it is not happening . its is giving me error LOGIN_PAM_AUTHENTICATION_ERROR: PAM authentication . please sugest me the correct configuration way out I m using Model: m120 with Junos : 9.2R2.15 -- Regards, Shariq Qamar, __

Re: [j-nsp] RE : Junos ISSU from 9.1 to 9.2

Hi Sofiane - after this: "ISSU: Preparing Backup RE Pushing bundle to re1" everything goes down for about 18min (BGP, OSPF and LDP). This does not happen between 9.0 and 9.1. Or between service releases on 9.2. Only between 9.1 and 9.2. Embarrassing. Thanks, Marlon On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:4

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 9.2 and few old PICs support

We recently tested a PE-4OC3-SON-SMIR on an M10i w/9.2 and it worked (although we did not put it though a lot of load). The SONET pics are all based on the same ASIC (D-Chip) so they should work. I don't know about the GE PIC. david David Waldman | Teliris | 55 Broadway New York, NY 100

Re: [j-nsp] flexible-ethernet-services on 1000 LH interfaces

Dan, flexible-ethernet-encap is only supported on SFP interfaces (except for the M7i builtin-ge which doesnt support it). If you have fixed optics interfaces this is not supported. Regards, Jonas On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 14:58, Dan Benson wrote: > All, > > I am trying to build l2circuits between a

Re: [j-nsp] flexible-ethernet-services on 1000 LH interfaces

Right you all are, thank you for confirming my fear. Take care. //db % more messages | grep Illegal Oct 10 10:08:43 NODE /kernel: ge-0/1/0: Illegal media change. Flexible-Ethernet-Services is invalid Oct 10 10:08:43 NODE /kernel: ge-0/2/0: Illegal media change. Flexible-Ethernet-Services i

Re: [j-nsp] flexible-ethernet-services on 1000 LH interfaces

> I am trying to build l2circuits between a few junipers in my network > without any luck. In my test case I have M20s with dual LH optic GIGe > interfaces facing a cisco cat 6500 using 802.3ad where I then have > vlans hanging off said switch to service downstream transit customers > and,

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 9.2 and few old PICs support

> I just want to know whether Junos 9.2 running in M10i/M7i support and > valid for following PICs: > > 1. PE-2OC3-SON-SMIR > 2. PE-2OC3-SON-MM > 3. PE-1GE-SX-B > > Which version is the valid and supported for above PICs? According to PSN-2007-12-037, PE-2OC3-SON-SMIR and PE-2OC3-SON-MM have a "

Re: [j-nsp] flexible-ethernet-services on 1000 LH interfaces

I know that with the PICs on my old m10s, flexible-ethernet-services wasn't supported, but it indicated such in /var/log/messages. You seeing anything there? David 2008/10/15 Dan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > All, > > I am trying to build l2circuits between a few junipers in my network withou

Re: [j-nsp] flow-routes "then routing-instance" action

Hi Felix, I loaded your setup and it works for me. First if you expect icmp (destination unreachable) replies you should change the the 10.10.5.7/32 host route to "reject" - otherwise although redirected to RI testFlow they are silently discarded. How you decided the traffic is not passing VRF

[j-nsp] flexible-ethernet-services on 1000 LH interfaces

All, I am trying to build l2circuits between a few junipers in my network without any luck. In my test case I have M20s with dual LH optic GIGe interfaces facing a cisco cat 6500 using 802.3ad where I then have vlans hanging off said switch to service downstream transit customers and, I

[j-nsp] flow-routes "then routing-instance" action

I can't wrap my head around how the routing-instance config on Junos should look like for me to be able to use a flow route to put traffic into the routing instance, maybe one of you can help. I have a flow route like this: show configuration routing-options flow route flow-test { match {