It's printed in the limitations section of the release notes actually.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:37, OBrien, Will obri...@missouri.edu wrote:
We ran into an interesting case where we can't terminate tunnel interfaces
on virtual routers on a SRX - only the primary. Has anyone else run into
Hello Truman,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Finally i found that classification is correctly done but the interface is
unable to show ingress statistics (IQ PIC) unlike the IQ2 PICs.
show interfaces queue ingress ge-0/2/0
Ingress queue statistics are not applicable to this interface.
is
Hi,
Only the IQ2 PIC supports ingress queue stats.
Truman
On 19/02/2010, at 9:48 PM, meryem Z wrote:
Hello Truman,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Finally i found that classification is correctly done but the interface is
unable to show ingress statistics (IQ PIC) unlike the IQ2 PICs.
Hello Community,
Is it possible on juniper router to verify/monior the loss-priority of ingress
or egress realtime traffic ?
Thank you.
_
Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec une
Loss priority is a internal setting for COS so its not carried in the IP
packet so AFAIK its not possible
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, meryem Z merye...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Community,
Is it possible on juniper router to verify/monior the loss-priority of
ingress or egress realtime
.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4880 (20100219) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
On Friday 19 February 2010 04:52:30 pm Ioan Branet wrote:
I used a 6500 instead of 7600 as PE1 and connect this
6500 to Juniper MX (PE1-CE1 link) and it works,it seems
that the problem is with this Cisco 7600,maybe a bug or
something like this.
You probably mentioned this in an earlier
Hello,
I use 7609 with the following IOS:
#sh ver | i IOS
Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software
(c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB4, RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc3)
There is no problem with IOS because on another 7609 with same IOS the
EOMPLS circuit works the only difference
On Friday 19 February 2010 10:52:22 pm Dan Farrell wrote:
TBH, I have no clue about the licensing ramifications,
only that for the price I paid, I was given the ability
to do OSPF, IBGP/EBGP. And it works, with a few kinks
(full tables incoming seems to be an issue).
As you've probably
to do OSPF, IBGP/EBGP. And
it works, with a few kinks (full tables incoming seems to be an
issue).
As you've probably realized, the platform won't support a full v4 table.
Cheers,
Mark.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4881 (20100219
On Saturday 20 February 2010 12:45:17 am Ioan Branet wrote:
There is no problem with IOS because on another 7609 with
same IOS the EOMPLS circuit works the only difference
is that on the 7609 on which the EOMPLS won't works is
that i have redundant processors and the following
module:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:10:12PM -0700, Tommy Perniciaro wrote:
Yes - that's correct.
Junos will complain about not having the license but BGP will still
work, same deal on the J series not having the route reflector
license, still works just complains :)
EX's BGP license is (last I
Hi
I have an ERX1400 series, the license ERX-EM-LTU appears on the system
price list as an event mirroring licence, but there is no information
in the documentation about how I activate it and if it is really
needed for packet mirroring or any other feature, please let me know
if anyone have more
13 matches
Mail list logo
