[j-nsp] Strange PIC Problem with 1xG/E, 1000 BASE-SX

Dear List, I have very odd problem with one 1000 BASE-SX PIC with an old m7i. Here is the Hardware inventory: Item Version Part number Serial number Description Chassis36390 M7i Midplane REV 04 710-008761

Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

* Patrik Olsson: You can turn off the netscreen flow style of forwarding and fall back to packet based forwarding in J series and SRX for that matter. But still, the perfomance number stays the same even if you keep the flow based forwarding instead och packet based. It seems that this is

Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

I saw the same thing in my testing. It's a memory issue. I upgraded to a fully loaded J4350 and everything is running great. Thanks, Joe -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Florian Weimer Sent:

[j-nsp] EX4200 vs. C4948

There is an interesting thread on the C list right now discussing the benefits of a l3 switch platform (OP started asking about 3550). I am budgeting to replace some 3560G and 3750G customer aggregation devices (OSPF, BGP) with devices that will scale better, have redundant power, can do

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 vs. C4948

If you're not in a rush, you might find the upcoming EX4300 interesting. It's supposed to be based on the MX hardware, which suggests that policers would be better supported. On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Bill Blackford wrote: There is an interesting thread on the C list right now discussing

[j-nsp] Controlling which IP on an Interface is used for PIM

I have two IP addresses on an Interface, which is connected to an upstream network which has a Multicast source on it. I am running PIM, but the PIM requests are being sent from the wrong IP, is there a way to specify which of the two IP's should be used for the PIM requests? Thanks, Shane

Re: [j-nsp] Controlling which IP on an Interface is used for PIM

-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:59 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Controlling which IP on an Interface is used for PIM I

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 vs. C4948

Don't forget dual power supply in the box.  Thats nice. 10.0r3 is coming and we will be moving all of our EXs to it when it arrives. As far as egress policing, it isn't there today.  However, you could configure a port-level or queue-level shaping-rate.  You could then change the default