On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:48:36AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about
> this kind of stuff ;)
>
> We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality -
> some are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues wit
Similar experience with a srx650 cluster on 10.4. ISP did not have their
Ethernet links set to auto/auto since that is all reths support in a cluster.
They would randomly stop forwarding traffic and could be fixed with failing the
cluster to the secondary node. It was impossible to trouble shoot
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:48:36AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this
> kind of stuff ;)
Someday he explained his setup here:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2010-February/015599.html
and, i think, running bgp [o
Yep, the FTP ALG has been a real dark and sinister sadist for a while.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Scott T. Cameron wrote:
> I have 2x chassis cluster with SRX3400s.
>
> ALGs will destroy your soul. Avoid at all costs.
> Chassis cluster upgrades are needlessly painful (imo).
> Session counts
I have 2x chassis cluster with SRX3400s.
ALGs will destroy your soul. Avoid at all costs.
Chassis cluster upgrades are needlessly painful (imo).
Session counts can become exhausted very easily and lead to a very quick and
dreadful DOS.
Most of my early adopter issues have disappeared with update
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed - do you remember
> what version of JunOS you were running by chance?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Nathan Sipes [mailto:nathan.si...@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-01-11 12:05 PM
> To: Pa
Mine here at home has been working well, with the internal ADSL2.
Only initial issue I had were the dumb MTU and MSS defaults.
Only time it gets rebooted is when I pull the wrong cord
Now I need to fix DDNS. Had it working on 10.1, but 10.4 and 11.x break it
again.
On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:0
That may be the difference I am running the SRX-MP-1VDSL2-A PIM.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Jerry Jones wrote:
> Mine here at home has been working well, with the internal ADSL2.
>
> Only initial issue I had were the dumb MTU and MSS defaults.
>
> Only time it gets rebooted is when I pul
Weird, I have a number of SRX210s running 10.4Rx and have had no notable issues
at all. Now 9.x code was a totally different story. I work out of my home
office, so my main 210 has to be working all the time, which it does just fine.
Currently Running:
ADSL2+ PIM for uplink, 10Mb
V4 + V6 (both
10.4R2 and 11.1R2 The local interzone traffic continued to forward and
traffic sourced from the outside interface continued to work.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed – do you remember
> what version of JunOS you were ru
We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed - do you remember
what version of JunOS you were running by chance?
Paul
From: Nathan Sipes [mailto:nathan.si...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-01-11 12:05 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS
I have had similar experiences to Richard's with the "Free SRX210H" I even
managed to get a DSL PIM in there as well. Had it up and working for about 2
months when the pim quit forwarding traffic randomly. Rebooting the SRX
seems to fix it well enough though... I will say that the free hardware has
Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this
kind of stuff ;)
We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - some
are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely it's
not perfect). We've been bitten by some surprises as
On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the
only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider
returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to
describe it, my condolences to anyone wh
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:59:26PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> 10.4R4.5 today on our EX3200's/4200's.
We were forced (kicking and screaming) into 11.1S2 on our EX8200s for
some feature support that just wasn't available any other way, but all
things considered the code has actually been pretty da
15 matches
Mail list logo
