Correct me if I'm wrong, but backup routing engines never have adjacencies
or peering relationships etc because they are not active, correct? When
they become master they have to reestablish those sessions. Thats how it
seems to be for our SRX routing engines, at least, but routes are shared
betwee
Hi everyone
We have an mx router that will be acting as BRAS router, with the following
config.:
dynamic-profiles {
pppoe_profile {
routing-instances {
"$junos-routing-instance" {
interface "$junos-interface-name";
}
}
Hi everyone
We have an MX960 with two routing engines, Re0: Backup, Re1: Master
When we try to switchover to the backup RE we see the following message:
XXX# run request chassis routing-engine master switch
error: Standby Routing Engine is not ready for graceful switchover
(replication_e
> I'm trying to work with an interface that has mixed subinterfaces. some of
> the subinterfaces are part of a bridge domain, some are family inet, and one
> interface is PPPOE for subscriber termination.
>
>
> unit 402 {
> description Wireless_PPPOE;
> encapsulation ppp-over-ether;
>
Hi,
Potentially odd question here but does anyone know, from 1st hand
experience, whether WAN-PHY mode is supported on 10g interfaces in
EX-series devices? Specifically EX4200 and/or EX4500?
I ask because we have a new carrier circuit being delivered in the
not-too-distant future and we need to p
Hi there..
I'm trying to work with an interface that has mixed subinterfaces. some of
the subinterfaces are part of a bridge domain, some are family inet, and one
interface is PPPOE for subscriber termination.
The family inet and bridge domain combination works fine but as soon as I
try to
Hi Ido,
Thanks to Harry Reynolds, I also figured out how to accomplish what you wanted
even for traffic entering from a remote PE.
The trick is to apply the filter-based forwarding policy to the vrf-a
forwarding table rather than to a specific interface.
This requires to firewall filters with
Hi Ido,
I have a setup that accomplishes most of what you were asking. Take a look at
my topology and configs.
Topology:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13293084/j-nsp_topology/Topology.png
pe1 config
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13293084/j-nsp_topology/pe1-config.txt
pe2 config
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13
I saw something similar on a T-series w/2 REs running 10.0, and it
was related to an NSR bug that was causing the backup RE to thrash and
push CPU through the roof on the primary. Also recall a mib2d bug
resulting in high CPU, though I'm sure you would have noticed in
either case.
David
On 14
Yes. That was the first thing we checked. I should've mentioned that.
Serge
From: "sth...@nethelp.no"
To: se...@nbnet.nb.ca; sergevaut...@yahoo.ca
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:41:02 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Random BGP pe
> It's been rare but we've seen random iBGP peer drops. The first was
> several months ago. We've now seen 2 in the last week.
Have you verified that you have a consistent MTU throughout your net?
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
___
Hello,
We have an MPLS network made up of many MX960s and MX80s. We run OSPF as our
IGP - all links in area 0. BGP is used for signaling of all L2VPN & VPLS. At
this time we only have 1 L3VPN for mgmt. LDP is used for for transport LSPs. We
have M10i as dedicated Route Reflectors. Most MX are o
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Doug Hanks wrote:
> It's as expected; you have to use vlan-tagging to add the 4 bytes to the
> MTU. It's a documentation error.
Thank you for your clarification.
Regards,
Dawid
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
13 matches
Mail list logo
